SKEMA Business School vs NEOMA Business School vs Audencia Business School vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs ESSCA School of Management

Side-by-side comparison from 202 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Schiller International University (4.50)
SKEMA Business School: wins 1/7 categories
NEOMA Business School: wins 3/7 categories
Audencia Business School: wins 0/7 categories
EM Normandie - EM Normandie: wins 0/7 categories
ESSCA School of Management: wins 0/7 categories
Schiller International University: wins 3/7 categories
Ecole des Ponts Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: MSc in International Management & Business
Best programme: MSc International Logistics and Port Management
Best programme: International Business
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.50
Top
Read more reviews
13 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Category ratings
Facilities
4.21
Win
3.95
3.85
4.00
3.58
3.92
Not rated
Location
4.25
3.84
4.00
3.57
4.08
4.92
Win
Not rated
Professors
4.42
4.20
4.03
4.00
4.00
4.62
Win
Not rated
Internationality
4.37
4.15
4.29
4.14
4.00
4.92
Win
Not rated
Student life
4.10
4.42
Win
3.93
3.71
4.17
4.15
Not rated
Value
4.04
4.25
Win
4.16
4.00
3.67
4.23
Not rated
Accommodation
3.57
4.00
Win
3.47
3.50
3.25
3.62
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong international exposure and campus network
  • +Practical, up-to-date curriculum with business application
  • +Valuable career support and alumni network
  • +Professionalizing opportunities and strong alumni network
  • +Engaging courses with diverse international classmates and professional professors
  • +Vibrant student community and associations
  • +Excellent professors, classes, and facilities.
  • +Diverse international student community and cultural immersion.
  • +Well-structured programs and ample opportunities for professional development and city exploration.
  • +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
  • +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
  • +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
  • +Practical, experiential learning with real-world application.
  • +Strong international focus, diversity, and global opportunities.
  • +Supportive faculty and high-quality teaching.
  • +Culturally diverse environment and international campus access
  • +Supportive and organized academic environment with helpful instructors
  • +Opportunities for career advancement and independent learning

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt academic progress.
  • -Poor communication and guidance hinder student career goals.
  • -Concerns exist regarding faculty conduct and focus on profit over education.
  • -Administrative and management issues create constant problems.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and in disrepair.
  • -Course content is frequently irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Lack of practical training and outdated facilities.
  • -Unresponsive professors and poor management.
  • -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
  • -Expensive tuition for irrelevant courses and unqualified instructors.
  • -Lack of student motivation and engagement in academics.
  • -Lack of extracurriculars and limited opportunities for lower-year students.
  • -Poor campus environment and a perceived low academic standard.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution shows impressive strengths in its academic and international components, with Professors receiving a high rating of 4.42 and Internationality scoring 4.37. Location and Facilities are also well-regarded, both above 4.20. However, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a score of 3.57, significantly lower than other categories. Student Life and Value are rated moderately, around 4.10 and 4.04 respectively.

Overall, this university garners favorable reviews across multiple aspects. Student life emerges as the strongest area, achieving a notable 4.42. Professors and value are also highly rated at 4.2 and 4.25 respectively. Facilities represent the weakest point among the surveyed categories, scoring 3.95, though still indicating a generally positive experience.

Regarding its overall assessment, the institution performs best in **Internationality** (4.29) and **Value** (4.16). Professors also receive a high mark (4.03). The weakest area identified is **Accomodation** (3.47), though Facilities also scored relatively lower (3.85). Student Life and Location received solid ratings in the mid-range.

This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.

This institution garners particularly high marks for Student Life, averaging over 4.16, with Location also scoring well at 4.08. Professors and Internationality are also rated positively at a solid 4.0. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, receiving a 3.25 rating, while Facilities and Value are mid-range.

With a strong emphasis on location and internationality, this university also scores very well for its professors and student life. Value for money is also a positive aspect. The weakest areas, while still respectable, are its facilities and accommodation.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90%), highlighting great faculty, strong international opportunities, and practical curriculum beneficial for careers. A small percentage (~3%) reported issues with management, communication, and program organization.

With an average rating of 4.2/5 from 20 reviews, ~80% are positive. Students praise the program structure, interesting courses, professionalizing opportunities, and good student vibe. Some mention occasional teaching experience gaps.

With an average rating of 4.19/5, roughly 94% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent classes, professors, and facilities. One negative review expressed disappointment with a lack of practical training and professor engagement.

Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.

Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising practical and international teaching, supportive staff, and a great environment. One review (around 8%) expressed dissatisfaction with course relevance and teaching quality.

With a 4.54/5 average rating, nearly all students praise Schiller for its culturally rich environment and global opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~7.7%) suggests the university may be better suited for those seeking a less demanding academic path.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
49%
40%
31%
43%
25%
69%
0%
4★
43%
40%
63%
29%
42%
23%
0%
3★
7%
20%
0%
14%
25%
0%
0%
2★
1%
0%
6%
0%
8%
8%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Experience in School

My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.

Nothing to show

Focus on multicultural business management

I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.

Nothing to show

Engaging

ESSCA School of Management is known for its international approach and diverse programs. In my opinion, many students appreciate its emphasis on experiential learning and the opportunities for international exposure through exchange programs and internships. However, some may find the workload demanding and challenging but that's the way it operates. Whether I recommend it would depend on your specific academic and career goals, as well as your preferences for learning style and environment. Likes/ Dislikes: *Essca provides enormous opportunities to improve and enhance your skill. *Diversified culture *Provides webinars and seminars across all the campuses. *Workload Management could be seen as an disadvantage. As sometimes, you may find it very challenging.

For the love of Schiller

Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close