London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs London Business School - LBS vs Istituto Marangoni vs Glasgow Caledonian University vs Ulster University

Side-by-side comparison from 547 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: London Business School - LBS (4.80)
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 0/7 categories
London Business School - LBS: wins 6/7 categories
Istituto Marangoni: wins 1/7 categories
Glasgow Caledonian University: wins 0/7 categories
Ulster University: wins 0/7 categories
Jolt.io: wins 0/7 categories
Management Forum: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
London, The United Kingdom
4.80
Top
Read more reviews
46 reviews
×
Best programme: Finance
London, The United Kingdom
3.70
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: International Fashion Business
London, The United Kingdom
4.40
Read more reviews
138 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management
Belfast, The United Kingdom
4.40
Read more reviews
38 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.04
4.76
Win
3.33
4.44
4.10
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.78
4.89
Win
4.67
4.75
4.12
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.26
4.65
Win
4.33
4.33
4.37
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.80
4.96
Win
4.67
4.52
4.12
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.63
4.83
Win
3.67
4.36
3.97
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.04
4.72
Win
4.33
4.49
4.26
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.78
3.87
4.00
Win
3.93
3.66
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Expert and experienced faculty
  • +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
  • +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
  • +Practical, career-focused learning and skill development
  • +Highly international community of bright and supportive peers
  • +Exceptional faculty and an inspiring, ambitious environment
  • +Global fashion hub and career opportunities
  • +Inspiring teachers and valuable learning experiences
  • +Strong employability focus and employer links
  • +Well-designed, modern campus facilities
  • +Supportive learning environment and accessible faculty
  • +Convenient location and modern facilities
  • +Supportive and engaging lecturers
  • +Industry-focused and practical learning

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
  • -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
  • -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
  • -Excessive workload and insufficient support contribute to student stress.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Poor communication and administrative inefficiencies create frustration.
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication breakdowns and lack of transparency are significant problems.
  • -Program content lacks practical business skills and focus on "hard facts."
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Facility issues, particularly with outdated labs, cause frustration.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Lack of responsiveness and support from staff is common.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.

Outstanding marks highlight the university's strengths, particularly in **Internationality (4.96)**, **Location (4.89)**, and **Student Life (4.83)**. Facilities and Value also received high scores. Conversely, **Accomodation (3.87)** emerges as the weakest area, suggesting room for improvement in this specific aspect of the student experience. Professors also scored well at 4.65.

This institution shines particularly brightly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving excellent scores. **Professors** and **Value** also stand out as strong points. Conversely, the **Facilities** represent the weakest area, scoring considerably lower than other aspects. **Student Life** and **Accomodation** fall in the mid-range, indicating areas for potential improvement but also solid performance.

An assessment of the university reveals exceptionally high ratings, particularly in **Location** (4.75) and **Internationality** (4.52). The university also scores well in **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Value**. The area receiving the lowest score is **Accomodation** (3.93), indicating this as the weakest point in the overall evaluation.

Reviewing university metrics reveals a generally positive assessment. The institution excels in **Professor quality**, boasting a 4.37 rating, and also scores highly for **Value** at 4.26. Areas like **Student Life** (3.97) and **Accommodations** (3.66) represent the lower end of the spectrum, though still within a respectable range. Other aspects such as Facilities, Location, and Internationality all fall around the 4.1 mark.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.

With a 4.8/5 average rating from 46 reviews, students highly praise the practical, hands-on learning and the supportive, international community. The ambitious environment and driven classmates are frequently highlighted positive themes.

With a 3.67 average rating, positive feedback (~33%) highlights fashion business opportunities and inspiring teachers. No negative reviews were provided.

With 138 reviews averaging 4.42 stars, ~93% praise strong employer links, career focus, and supportive learning environments. A small fraction (~0.7%) noted curriculum gaps.

~97% of reviews are positive, praising the great location, supportive lecturers, and industry-focused courses. Only ~3% of feedback mentioned issues with campus management.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
34%
80%
33%
51%
55%
0%
0%
4★
44%
20%
0%
40%
32%
0%
0%
3★
19%
0%
67%
8%
11%
0%
0%
2★
2%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

Amazing focus on networking and employment at the cost of theorical knowledge

I liked this programme for three main reasons. Firstly, the sense of community you get over the short (1-year) MIM programme is outstanding. The school provides students with daily opportunities to get together and you get really well integrated in a matter of days. Second, the school's utmost priority is your employement. LBS possesses a great career centre that constantly pushes you to look for job opportunities and provides you with great interview trainings. Finally, I believe that only 5% of the students come from the UK, meaning that the school is fully international. On the other hand, from a knowledge perspective, I would not expect to learn much from the main courses if you already have a Bachelor in Business or Economics. The secondary courses you can choose from are, however, really handy. Thanks to its broad focus, this programme excels at preparing you for careers in Consulting or Investment Banking. It is also well recognized worldwide. To sum up, I would recommend this programme for international outgoing individuals who would like to pursue a career in Consulting or Investment Banking.

Educational content

I like a lot of it but I feel like the subject teaches us the same every time. There should be more diversity in our contents and make us work more in groups and do more exercises in class, in order words the classes should be more dynamic

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close