IÉSEG School of Management vs Rennes School of Business vs SKEMA Business School vs HEC Paris vs EDHEC Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 502 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Strong international community and global opportunities
- +Supportive professors and active student associations
- +Practical, real-world learning and experienced faculty
- +Diverse and international student and faculty community
- +Welcoming and supportive learning environment
- +International focus and diverse campus experiences
- +Practical, industry-relevant curriculum and career support
- +Strong community with great classmates and alumni network
- +Strong academics and practical application from expert faculty
- +Supportive community and engaging student body
- +Excellent career preparation and global opportunities
- +Rigorous academic and practical preparation for careers
- +Strong alumni network and career services support
- +International exposure and diverse student body
- +Practical teaching, real-life cases, and experiential learning
- +International environment and diverse programs with exchange opportunities
- +Supportive staff and high-quality teaching and content
- +Approachable and supportive professors
- +Practical learning and real-world experience
- +International environment and personal development
- -Last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
- -Perceived lack of effort to improve classroom experience.
- -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
- -Poor English communication from staff and professors is a major frustration.
- -Administrative and management issues create poor student experience.
- -Ineffective communication and guidance hinder career development.
- -Faculty and program organization are disappointing and overly focused on profit.
- -Administrative and management issues, including disorganization and perceived arrogance.
- -Poor teaching quality, with a lack of encouraging discussion and limited course selection.
- -Limited career prospects and lack of international recognition.
- -High tuition fees and perceived low return on investment.
- -Irrelevant courses and unqualified teachers lead to dissatisfaction.
- -High cost is not justified by the quality of education offered.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -A lack of communication and support from the institution is prevalent.
This university receives high marks across most categories, particularly excelling in **Internationality** (4.55). **Location** (4.29), **Student Life** (4.25), and **Value** (4.31) also demonstrate considerable strengths. Conversely, **Accomodation** (3.78) stands out as the weakest area among the assessed aspects, while **Facilities** (4.09) received a solid, yet comparatively lower, rating.
Assessing the university's performance reveals a generally positive reception from students. Student life stands out as the strongest area, alongside internationality and professors, all receiving high marks. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest point, scoring notably lower than other aspects. Other categories like facilities, location, and value also garnered solid, above-average ratings.
Across a range of metrics, this institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **professors** (4.41) and **internationality** (4.36). Facilities and location also received favorable scores, both above 4.2. Student life and value are rated around 4.0, indicating a generally positive experience. The weakest area is **accommodation**, which stands at 3.56, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect.
This institution garners an exceptional rating for **Internationality** at 4.44. **Student Life** and **Value** also score highly, both around 4.34. Conversely, **Location** received the lowest score at 3.92, indicating it is the relative weakness among the surveyed aspects. Other areas like Facilities, Professors, and Accommodation fall within a strong range of 4.0 to 4.18.
Academic and student experience aspects generally receive positive marks, with **Internationality** standing out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.41. Professors and Facilities are also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area at 3.14, indicating room for improvement in this regard. Location and Student Life are moderately rated, suggesting a solid but not exceptional experience in those domains.
This institution performs best in Student Life, receiving a strong rating of 4.18. Professors, Location, and Internationality also received excellent marks around 4.09. The weakest area for the university is Accomodation, scoring 3.27. Facilities and Value are rated moderately well, with scores of 3.64 and 3.82 respectively.
Receiving perfect scores across the board, this institution excels in all evaluated aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated as outstanding. With a consistent five-star performance across every category, there are no discernible weak areas to highlight. The university demonstrates a uniformly strong offering.
With a 4.38/5 average, ~99% of reviews are positive, praising interesting classes, international experiences, and practical preparation for work. A minimal 0.8% of feedback is negative, citing some course content and last-minute changes.
With ~97% positive feedback, students praise teaching methods, practical learning, global faculty, and strong business ties. A small fraction of reviews noted challenges for international students regarding language and administrative support.
The vast majority (~97%) of reviews are positive, praising international opportunities, practical curriculum, and strong alumni networks. A small percentage (~3%) express concerns about management, communication, and organization.
~74% of 31 reviews are positive, highlighting excellent professors, strong community, and a balance of academics with practical and global opportunities. A small percentage (~6.5%) expressed disappointment with program organization or teaching quality.
With a 4.24/5 average, ~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting intense courses, strong alumni networks, and excellent career services. A small percentage of feedback mentioned high tuition fees.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical teaching, international focus, and supportive staff. One review (around 9%) criticizes course relevance and instructor quality.
Both reviews are overwhelmingly positive, rating the university 5/5. Students praise the program's fulfillment of expectations, approachable professors, practical learning, and strong industry connections. The international environment and focus on personal development are also highlighted.
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
The school stands out as an exemplary institution with commendable features. The accommodation facilities are not only comfortable but also designed to foster a conducive learning environment. The faculty comprises diverse, highly qualified educators, ensuring a high standard of education. The emphasis on practical learning prepares students effectively for real-world scenarios. The institution offers a top-notch academic experience combined with excellent living standards, making it a highly recommended choice for those seeking quality education.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Very international and interesting place to be and opens a lot of opportunities, however the administration is very french and facilities are subpar (gym, classrooms) meaning the academic affairs is pretty much useless and lastly we are graded on a curve which can create a toxic environment because of the competition. With that being said the pros outweighs the cons by far.
I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.
ESSCA School of Management is known for its international approach and diverse programs. In my opinion, many students appreciate its emphasis on experiential learning and the opportunities for international exposure through exchange programs and internships. However, some may find the workload demanding and challenging but that's the way it operates. Whether I recommend it would depend on your specific academic and career goals, as well as your preferences for learning style and environment. Likes/ Dislikes: *Essca provides enormous opportunities to improve and enhance your skill. *Diversified culture *Provides webinars and seminars across all the campuses. *Workload Management could be seen as an disadvantage. As sometimes, you may find it very challenging.
Nothing to show
