Warsaw University of Technology vs University of Euroregional Economy - WSGE vs Lazarski University vs Kozminski University vs Collegium Humanum Warsaw Management University

Side-by-side comparison from 221 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Collegium Humanum Warsaw Management University (5.00)
Warsaw University of Technology: wins 0/6 categories
University of Euroregional Economy - WSGE: wins 0/6 categories
Lazarski University: wins 2/6 categories
Kozminski University: wins 0/6 categories
Collegium Humanum Warsaw Management University: wins 4/6 categories
Civitas University: wins 0/6 categories
Warsaw University of Business - WWSB: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Warsaw, Poland
4.50
Read more reviews
112 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management
Best programme: Management
Best programme: Law
Warsaw, Poland
4.30
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: International Relations
Best programme: IT Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.33
4.25
4.61
4.51
5.00
Win
4.00
4.00
Location
4.73
2.75
4.56
4.08
5.00
Win
4.71
4.30
Professors
4.36
4.50
4.57
4.57
5.00
Win
4.21
4.10
Internationality
3.77
4.25
4.63
Win
4.57
4.50
4.36
4.10
Student life
4.18
4.50
4.46
4.48
4.50
3.93
3.80
Value
4.36
4.25
4.62
Win
4.50
4.50
4.00
4.30
Accommodation
3.82
4.00
3.87
4.16
4.50
Win
3.36
3.30
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent faculty and professors
  • +Recognized and high-quality programs
  • +Engaging and practical learning experience
  • +Affordable tuition and helpful staff
  • +Supportive professors and direct student contact
  • +Accessible location near Warsaw
  • +Excellent teachers and practical, real-world learning
  • +Engaging and supportive learning environment
  • +Modern facilities and international community
  • +Expert and approachable faculty with practical industry experience.
  • +Modern, well-equipped facilities and a vibrant, diverse campus life.
  • +Strong academic programs focused on practical knowledge and professional development.
  • +High education level and experienced professors
  • +Valuable new skills acquisition
  • +Worthwhile academic decision
  • +International environment and diverse student body
  • +Supportive staff and dedicated professors
  • +Small class sizes and engaging learning opportunities
  • +International environment and practical learning
  • +Supportive faculty and experienced lecturers
  • +Personal growth and networking opportunities
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Communication and support from staff are often inadequate.
  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt student experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and unclear communication cause frustration.
  • -Poor organization and unqualified instructors are a major concern.
  • -A lack of English proficiency among the student body hinders integration.
  • -Inadequate student support systems are a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities and resources
  • -Lack of practical application and career support
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
  • -Communication breakdowns and unclear expectations lead to student dissatisfaction.
  • -Lack of communication and disregard for student concerns on crucial issues.
  • -Disappointing student experience and unfulfilled expectations.
  • -Administrative & management issues lead to poor responsiveness and disappearing support after tuition payment.
Rating summary
What students say

With an overall strong showing, this institution excels particularly in **Location**, receiving its highest rating. **Professors** and **Value** also garnered impressive scores, indicating student satisfaction in these key areas. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** present the weakest points, scoring notably lower than other surveyed aspects. **Facilities** and **Student Life** fall within the upper-middle range of ratings.

Overall, this university garners strong ratings, particularly excelling in its **Professors** and **Student Life**, both achieving a high score of 4.5. The **Facilities**, **Internationality**, and **Value** also stand out with solid marks of 4.25. While **Accomodation** receives a good rating of 4, the **Location** emerges as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower at 2.75.

An excellent performance is evident across several key areas for this university. Its strongest areas are Internationality (4.63), Facilities (4.61), and Value (4.62), indicating a highly positive student experience in these aspects. Professors and Location also receive very strong scores. The weakest area appears to be Accomodation, with a rating of 3.87, suggesting room for improvement in this particular category.

Overall, this institution garners impressive scores in multiple facets. Its strongest areas are Professors and Internationality, both receiving a near-perfect 4.57. Facilities are also highly regarded at 4.51. The weakest, though still solid, is Location, with a rating of 4.08.

This institution garners excellent marks across the board. Its strongest areas, with perfect scores, are its facilities, professors, and prime location. Student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value are also highly rated, all receiving a 4.5. Overall, it presents a very appealing profile with no significant weaknesses identified.

This university receives strong marks, particularly for its **location** (4.7) and **internationality** (4.3). Areas like **facilities** and **value** also score well at 4.0. The **student life** rating is solid at 3.9. The **accommodation** category presents the weakest performance with a 3.3 rating, suggesting room for improvement in student housing.

The university demonstrates notable strengths in key areas. Location and value receive particularly high scores, suggesting excellent external factors and return on investment. Internationality and professors are also well-regarded. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, indicating room for improvement. Student life and facilities also score moderately, suggesting these aspects could benefit from enhancement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.22/5 from 23 reviews, ~74% are highly positive. Students praise excellent lecturers and a recognized reputation, while no negative feedback was noted.

With an average rating of 4.17/5 from 6 reviews, about 83% of feedback is highly positive. Students praise affordable tuition, helpful staff, direct lecturer support, and the university's positive environment. No negative feedback was provided.

With ~92% of 112 reviews being positive, students praise facilities, experienced teachers, and practical learning. A single negative review noted disorganization and an unsupportive student body.

Nearly all students praise the university's excellent academics, highly qualified and approachable professors, and modern facilities. The strong focus on practical knowledge and professional development, along with a vibrant international environment, are key highlights. No negative feedback was reported.

Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praised the high education level, great lectures, and experienced professors.

University reviews are largely positive (approximately 93%), with students appreciating the international environment and supportive staff. A small portion (~7%) expressed dissatisfaction regarding a canceled graduation ceremony.

With an average rating of 4/5, approximately 80% of reviews are highly positive, praising the international environment, supportive faculty, and practical learning. A small amount of negative feedback (~10%) mentions administrative responsiveness issues after payment.

Rating distribution
5★
35%
33%
64%
65%
100%
57%
40%
4★
52%
50%
27%
31%
0%
29%
40%
3★
13%
17%
8%
4%
0%
7%
10%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
7%
10%
Most useful review
Most liked
Aerospace Engineering Bachelor's

Well defined and well-maintained classes with highly trained professors. They are very much timely and can happily assist you and your questions during consultation 1 to 1. You can learn a great deal of Aerospace Engineering tools and get inspired by student clubs flying rockets and gliders, and racing cars.

My vision

University is very good, coordination between students and professors is nice, work ethics is appreciable,subjects related to topic and clear whole concepts about subject and atmosphere of university is very nice.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

I am glad to study here

I would definitely recommend Collegium Humanum to other students. High education level, I was able to learn a lot of new skills, professors with huge experience in the professional sector - this is why I highly rate

Nothing to show

Review

Personally, I think wwsb is one of the best private universities in Poland. It’s not just a place to study but a place to gain personal growth, networking opportunities, and the chance to contribute to research and innovation. The staffs are very friendly, teaching method is very unique and students can grasp what they’re being taught within a short period of time. Although there are no on-campus accommodations, the university helps you search for off-campus accommodation/apartment which I think is very good. The school is also situated at a very good location which makes the studying atmosphere wonderful.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close