Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs ESIC Business & Marketing School vs Escuela International de Gerencia - EIG vs Universidad CEU San Pablo - CEU USP vs UIC Barcelona
Side-by-side comparison from 287 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, industry-connected curriculum
- +Expert lecturers with real-world experience
- +Supportive professor-student relationships
- +Practical, real-world projects and learning
- +Experienced, professional professors with industry insights
- +Collaborative and supportive learning environment
- +Outstanding faculty support and engaging teaching.
- +Excellent facilities and resources for learning.
- +Guidance and opportunities for future career development.
- +Supportive, approachable professors and staff
- +Practical, real-world learning experiences
- +Flexible study options
- +Excellent academic quality and well-prepared graduates
- +Supportive and international student community
- +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
- +Solid academics and engaging professors
- +Vibrant city life and affordability
- +Positive student-teacher relationships and community
Nothing to show
- -Incompetent and unprofessional leadership and management.
- -Poor quality of instruction due to unqualified staff.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and lack of support.
- -Disrespectful and unhelpful staff, particularly regarding international student coordination.
- -Misleading information about teaching methods and the overall student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and administrative support cause frustration.
- -Lack of engagement and relevance in curriculum.
- -Poor English proficiency of professors and lack of organization.
- -Lack of support and care for Erasmus students.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Unhelpful and indifferent staff.
- -Deceptive financial practices.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Poor teaching quality and outdated curriculum
- -Disorganized and student-unfriendly academic processes
Nothing to show
Across various aspects, the university demonstrates strong performance, particularly in accommodation, which received the highest rating. Facilities, professors, and location also scored well, indicating solid foundational strengths. Student life and internationality received comparatively lower marks, suggesting areas where enhancements could be considered. Overall, the university presents a positive evaluation with a clear standout in its living arrangements.
This institution receives its highest marks for its Facilities and Location, both scoring 4.08. Student Life and Internationality are rated at a respectable 3.75. Areas receiving slightly lower scores include Accomodation and Value, both at 3.67, and Professors, at 3.92.
Academic strengths significantly outshine other aspects, with Professors receiving the highest rating. Conversely, Student Life and Internationality represent areas with lower scores. Facilities and Accommodation are rated moderately well, while Location and Value fall within a similar mid-range.
Overall, the university receives positive evaluations across various aspects. Professors are notably well-regarded, followed closely by excellent Facilities. In contrast, Accomodation and Internationality received the lowest scores, while Student Life and Value also fell in the mid-range. Location scored moderately.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.25, followed closely by **Facilities** at 4.17. **Student Life** is rated a respectable 3.75, while **Internationality** scores 3.83. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating of 3.33, and **Location** at 3.91. The university also scores well in **Value** at 3.92.
Student feedback indicates a university with exceptional strengths in **Student Life** (4.625) and **Location** (4.425). Areas for improvement, while still moderately rated, include **Facilities** (3.55) and **Professors** (3.575). The university also scores well in **Internationality** (4.25) and **Accomodation** (3.92), with a solid rating for **Value** (3.875).
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.29/5 from 17 reviews, ~76% of feedback is positive, highlighting practical learning, professional lecturers, and personal professor relationships. A small amount of negative feedback (~6%) points to poor management and unprofessionalism.
With a 4.14 average rating from 56 reviews, ~86% of students praise the practice-oriented approach and real-world projects. Professors are often industry professionals sharing practical experience. A single negative review questioned student support and hybrid system claims.
With a 4.07 average rating from 15 reviews, students praise the university's excellent facilities, engaging lecturers, and diverse program offerings. All feedback was positive, with no negative reviews received.
With a 4.06 average, ~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent infrastructure, approachable staff, and a practical learning approach. A small percentage (~4%) noted low professor English levels and disorganization.
With a 4.2/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong academics, supportive classmates, and good job preparation. ~7% of feedback is negative, citing issues with unhelpful administration.
About 53% of reviews are positive, praising solid academics, professors, and the enriching city experience. Around 15% are negative, citing disorganization, administrative issues, and poor staff empathy. The average rating is 3.44/5.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Worst university ever, I’m an İNTERNATİONAL student who came just for one semester for ERASMUS from another institution. It was the worst experience ever in my life, Esic university treated me so badly. The ERASMUS coordinator is really disrespectful and he didn’t even do a welcoming day for the new students. We didn’t get any training on how we can adapt to the university's system. First, they told us it is a hybrid system, which is not the case. This is the first lie from a higher education institution. They are really trying to push me to fail administration and also teachers I really feel it’s a religious problem about where I come from , plus I did all of my exams perfectly. Now I’m surprised that one teacher wants me to fail because I didn’t do one exercise ( just one in all semester lol) , my exam was perfect now she doesn’t want to show me my results and told me that she will make me fail because of one exercise. It is not fair and no one from the administration wants to help me as an Erasmus student, but I feel there is a difference between me and Spanish nationalities. Now I will take my legal right. They really discriminated against me in every way I’m really sad how I got used and treated this badly and also this issue has now become a personal issue, I really don’t recommend any İNTERNATİONAL students to join ESIC Valencia it’s the worst university on planet earth 😡
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
The academic content of the master has been very interesting to me and I think I have learned a lot. Coordination I think it can improve since in the subjects taught by more than one teacher I have identified a lack of coherence. In relation to the practices, several problems have arisen since, when working with the juvenile protection or penal system, on several occasions it has taken more than the appropriate period to accept the practices. Also the list of centers that were offered last year, at which point I had to choose, this year they were not offered. However, the content of the master seems very good to me.
Nothing to show
