Saint Petersburg State University - SPSU vs National Research University Higher School of Economics - HSE vs Northern (Arctic) Federal University - NARFU vs Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University - SPbPU vs Moscow International Higher Business School - MIRBIS
Side-by-side comparison from 71 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical skills and real-world experience
- +Supportive environment and positive social life
- +Quality teaching and engaging subjects
- +High academic quality & skilled faculty
- +Global outlook & diverse programs
- +Career opportunities & strong network
- +Practical skills & career focus
- +Quality education & experienced instructors
- +Access to modern equipment & international exchange opportunities
- +Advanced labs and modern equipment
- +Highly qualified and involved teaching staff
- +Diverse academic and extracurricular development opportunities
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Student-centered support and inclusivity
- +Welcoming and understanding community
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of support and clear communication from staff is prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues hinder student support.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and subjective academic processes are problematic.
- -Unrealistic exam difficulty and demanding workloads cause frustration.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues plague the institution.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Unsupportive faculty and a curriculum that feels disconnected from real-world application are significant drawbacks.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Ineffective teaching methods and curriculum design are problematic.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or poorly maintained.
- -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date.
Examining the university's performance reveals exceptional strengths, particularly in **Student Life** (4.75) and **Internationality** (4.5). Facilities and value also received positive scores. Conversely, **Location** (3.95) and **Accomodation** (3.925) represent areas with room for improvement, though professors garnered a respectable 4.1 rating.
This institution demonstrates a particularly strong showing in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. Value and Professors are also highly regarded. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest score among the evaluated aspects. The university also scores well in Internationality, Facilities, and Student Life, indicating a generally positive overall perception with a few areas for potential improvement.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength across multiple key areas, receiving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, location, student life, and overall value. The only area not achieving a top rating is accommodation, which still scores a solid 4 out of 5. Internationality also garners a strong 4, indicating a good global presence.
Overall, this university garners strong scores across most categories. Student life stands out as a particular strength, boasting the highest rating. Location also scores very well. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest marks, indicating an area for potential improvement. The university demonstrates a solid reputation for its professors, facilities, internationality, and value.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores awarded for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Value. These areas represent the university's most outstanding attributes. The accommodation rating of 3 indicates a moderate but not exceptional aspect of the student experience. Internationality also scores well at 4, suggesting a generally welcoming environment for global students.
With an average rating of 4.25/5, ~88% of reviews are positive, highlighting theoretical and soft skill development, good faculty, and enjoyable extracurriculars. There are no negative reviews.
Around 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting high-quality education, excellent faculty, and valuable connections. A small portion of feedback mentions issues with some professors and the grading system.
All 3 reviews are positive, averaging 4/5 stars. Students highlight practical skills, quality education, and access to advanced equipment and research opportunities.
~92% of reviews are positive, praising skill development, modern labs, and qualified, involved teaching staff. Students also highlight extracurricular activities and university prestige. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With one review, the university is highly rated at 5/5. This positive feedback highlights excellent student care and a welcoming environment. No negative reviews were received.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
'-': some equipment and manuals, that we study, are outdated. All buildings, except the main one, need to be repaired. Some teachers are incompetent in their subjects. ' ': Opportunities. A lot of opportunities. Large number of events are held at the university and if you will participate in them, you will develop yourself very much.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
