Warsaw University of Technology vs SGH Warsaw School of Economics - SGH vs SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities vs Graduate School for Social Research - GSSR vs Lazarski University
Side-by-side comparison from 259 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent faculty and professors
- +Recognized and high-quality programs
- +Engaging and practical learning experience
- +Inspiring academic environment and knowledgeable, supportive faculty
- +Strong focus on practical skills and real-world application
- +Prestigious reputation and pathway to a successful career
- +Passionate and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Well-organized and relevant programs
- +Positive learning environment and resources
- +High-quality teaching and respected professors
- +Engaging academic content and insightful thinkers
- +Well-organized courses and prepared materials
- +Excellent teachers and practical, real-world learning
- +Engaging and supportive learning environment
- +Modern facilities and international community
- +Expert and approachable faculty with practical industry experience.
- +Modern, well-equipped facilities and a vibrant, diverse campus life.
- +Strong academic programs focused on practical knowledge and professional development.
- +High education level and experienced professors
- +Valuable new skills acquisition
- +Worthwhile academic decision
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Communication and support from staff are often inadequate.
- -Bureaucracy and administrative issues
- -Lack of support and usability from online systems
- -Overbearing control over student organizations
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Poor organization and communication among staff lead to problems.
- -Lack of adequate academic structure and support is evident.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently disliked.
- -Lack of resources, including technology and learning materials, is a significant complaint.
- -Poor organization and unqualified instructors are a major concern.
- -A lack of English proficiency among the student body hinders integration.
- -Inadequate student support systems are a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and resources
- -Lack of practical application and career support
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
- -Communication breakdowns and unclear expectations lead to student dissatisfaction.
With an overall strong showing, this institution excels particularly in **Location**, receiving its highest rating. **Professors** and **Value** also garnered impressive scores, indicating student satisfaction in these key areas. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** present the weakest points, scoring notably lower than other surveyed aspects. **Facilities** and **Student Life** fall within the upper-middle range of ratings.
This university demonstrates a strong presence in key areas, with **Location** receiving the highest marks at 4.67. **Professors** and **Value** also perform well, scoring above 4.1. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, rated at 3.58. Other categories like Facilities, Student Life, and Internationality all fall within a comparable, solid range, generally above 4.0.
This institution presents a strong academic profile, with exceptional ratings for its professors and facilities. Location and internationality also score well. Student life and accommodation represent areas with lower, though still respectable, scores compared to other aspects. The overall value for money is perceived positively, aligning with the location rating.
Across all surveyed categories, the university has received consistent ratings of zero. This indicates no discernible strengths or weaknesses in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value. The uniform scores suggest a lack of significant positive or negative attributes in any area evaluated.
An excellent performance is evident across several key areas for this university. Its strongest areas are Internationality (4.63), Facilities (4.61), and Value (4.62), indicating a highly positive student experience in these aspects. Professors and Location also receive very strong scores. The weakest area appears to be Accomodation, with a rating of 3.87, suggesting room for improvement in this particular category.
Overall, this institution garners impressive scores in multiple facets. Its strongest areas are Professors and Internationality, both receiving a near-perfect 4.57. Facilities are also highly regarded at 4.51. The weakest, though still solid, is Location, with a rating of 4.08.
This institution garners excellent marks across the board. Its strongest areas, with perfect scores, are its facilities, professors, and prime location. Student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value are also highly rated, all receiving a 4.5. Overall, it presents a very appealing profile with no significant weaknesses identified.
With an average rating of 4.22/5 from 23 reviews, ~74% are highly positive. Students praise excellent lecturers and a recognized reputation, while no negative feedback was noted.
Around 96% of reviews are positive, praising the inspiring community, academic rigor, and dedicated faculty. A small percentage of feedback (around 4%) mentions issues with bureaucracy and administrative processes.
Nearly all reviews are positive, praising passionate lecturers and well-organized programs. A small percentage of feedback mentions concerns about program structure and course coordination.
With a 4.5/5 average rating, 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent professors and high-quality content, though some note outdated management and poor funding.
With ~92% of 112 reviews being positive, students praise facilities, experienced teachers, and practical learning. A single negative review noted disorganization and an unsupportive student body.
Nearly all students praise the university's excellent academics, highly qualified and approachable professors, and modern facilities. The strong focus on practical knowledge and professional development, along with a vibrant international environment, are key highlights. No negative feedback was reported.
Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praised the high education level, great lectures, and experienced professors.
Well defined and well-maintained classes with highly trained professors. They are very much timely and can happily assist you and your questions during consultation 1 to 1. You can learn a great deal of Aerospace Engineering tools and get inspired by student clubs flying rockets and gliders, and racing cars.
Attending the Warsaw School of Economics has been an enriching journey. The academic standard is impressive, offering a variety of programs that balance solid theoretical knowledge with practical skills. Professors are highly qualified and foster engaging discussions that stimulate intellectual growth. The curriculum is current, reflecting global trends and addressing real-world issues. Accommodation options are diverse, with university dorms offering affordable yet basic living conditions, though they can be competitive to secure. Private rentals are also available, though they tend to be pricier, particularly close to the center of Warsaw. As a Polish student, the tuition fees are quite reasonable in comparison to other European institutions, making SGH an excellent investment in my education. Campus life is dynamic, with numerous student clubs, events, and opportunities to connect with others. The university cultivates a strong community spirit, and there’s always something going on whether academic, social, or cultural. All in all, SGH provides a well-rounded and fulfilling university experience.
Overall, i would rate programme at SWPS positively. What stands out the most is the practical approach to lerning. Many lectures have real professional expierience and often explain topics throhu examples from thier field, not only through theory or slides. The atmosphere is modern, open and quite relaxed, wich makes it easier to feel comfortable as a student. I also like that the university encourages independent thinking and discussion. However the organization could be better, especially considering the tuition fees. Some classes feel more useful and better prepared than others.
I have found great thinkers among both students and lecturers. I have enjoyed some courses more than I took pleasure in others, but that is solely due to my increased interest and the preference I hold for theory, especially social and cultural, whereby my greatest pleasure must have been meeting and partaking in classes held by professor Slawomir Kapralski whom I hold in highest respect. The classes are well-ordered and organized, the material is prepared and provided, the professors are attentive, kind and prompt in their correspondence - no less is the case when it comes to the correspondence one seeks in the support that the dean or the rest of the faculty staff will be willing to provide.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I would definitely recommend Collegium Humanum to other students. High education level, I was able to learn a lot of new skills, professors with huge experience in the professional sector - this is why I highly rate
