EU Business School vs GBSB Global Business School vs IE University vs Universidad Europea - UE vs Mondragon University

Side-by-side comparison from 581 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Europea - UE (4.90)
EU Business School: wins 0/7 categories
GBSB Global Business School: wins 0/7 categories
IE University: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad Europea - UE: wins 0/7 categories
Mondragon University: wins 1/7 categories
C3S Business School in Barcelona - C3S: wins 0/7 categories
Advantere School of Management: wins 5/7 categories
Comparing
Barcelona, Spain
3.90
Read more reviews
251 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration and Digital Innovation
Madrid, Spain
4.40
Read more reviews
160 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Mondragon, Spain
4.80
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Advanced Control and Systems Engineering
Best programme: BA Hons in Business Management (Level 4
Best programme: Master’s in International Management (MIM)
Category ratings
Facilities
4.04
3.36
4.35
4.33
4.50
4.05
4.66
Win
Location
4.73
4.48
4.55
4.00
4.33
4.43
4.77
Win
Professors
4.04
4.13
4.36
4.29
4.25
4.63
4.79
Win
Internationality
4.72
4.64
4.76
Win
4.60
4.50
4.56
4.55
Student life
4.22
3.83
4.36
4.11
4.50
4.32
4.78
Win
Value
3.87
3.62
4.24
3.78
4.25
4.40
4.62
Win
Accommodation
3.42
2.79
3.77
3.87
4.50
Win
3.69
4.37
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Helpful professors and career support
  • +Valuable practical and theoretical business knowledge
  • +Enriching overall student experience
  • +Balanced academic theory with practical, real-world application
  • +Knowledgeable, passionate, and engaged lecturers
  • +Strong community and international atmosphere
  • +Engaging professors with deep knowledge and professional backgrounds
  • +International and interdisciplinary environment fostering networking and diverse perspectives
  • +Practical learning and strong support for student success
  • +Modern teaching and attractive campus
  • +Strong business opportunities and practical learning
  • +Supportive faculty and international exchange programs
  • +Welcoming environment and ample opportunities for involvement.
  • +Diverse and inclusive community with strong support for student success.
  • +Forward-thinking, practical education aligned with global and social needs.
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Practical and well-structured courses
  • +Welcoming and diverse international environment
  • +Practical, real-world projects and industry focus
  • +Strong professional network and career preparation
  • +Supportive and personalized learning environment
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
  • -Outdated facilities and a focus on attendance over quality education are criticized.
  • -The educational program is perceived as basic and unaccredited in some regions.
  • -Poor academic quality and lack of practical value in degrees.
  • -Administrative and organizational issues with limited student support.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and outdated or inadequate facilities.
  • -Academic standards and course quality are frequently criticized.
  • -Marketing promises, particularly regarding technology and flexibility, do not align with reality.
  • -The campus environment lacks traditional college experience and diversity.
  • -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative staff.
  • -Teachers are indifferent and unsupportive of student learning.
  • -High costs for course materials.
  • -Ineffective communication and unresponsive administration create frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder learning.
  • -Unclear grading policies and inconsistent feedback cause confusion.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor internship support and disregard for student complaints.
  • -Inconsistent staff helpfulness and attitude.
  • -Excessive administrative burdens and management issues are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant concern.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution excels in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving the highest marks at 4.73. Student Life also scores well at 4.22. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.42, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Professors are rated consistently around 4.04, while Value sits at a respectable 3.87.

This institution shines brightest in its **internationality**, boasting a near-perfect score. **Location** is another significant strength, highly valued by students. Conversely, **accommodation** presents the most significant area for improvement, receiving the lowest rating. Other aspects like **professors** and **student life** are well-regarded, while **facilities** and **value** fall within the mid-range.

This institution garners significant praise for its exceptional internationality, achieving a rating of 4.76. Location is also a strong suit, rated at 4.55. Student life and professors are well-regarded, both scoring 4.36, closely followed by facilities at 4.35. Value for money is rated at 4.24. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.77.

Overall, the university receives strong marks, particularly in **Internationality (4.6)** and **Facilities (4.33)**. Student Life and Professors also score well, both above 4.2. The weakest areas identified are **Accomodation (3.87)** and **Value (3.78)**, though these still represent a moderately positive rating.

This university receives high marks, particularly excelling in Facilities, Student Life, Accommodation, and Internationality, all scoring a near-perfect 4.5. Its Location also garners strong appreciation at 4.33. The Professors and Value categories, while still positive, represent the comparatively lower scores at 4.25. Overall, the institution demonstrates broad strengths with only slight areas for potential improvement.

Academic and international aspects of the university are highly regarded, with Professors receiving an exceptional score of 4.63 and Internationality a strong 4.56. Location and Value also perform well, both exceeding 4.3. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.69. Facilities and Student Life are rated moderately well, around 4.05 and 4.32 respectively.

This institution receives a well-rounded set of ratings. **Professors** are the highest-rated area, closely followed by **Student Life** and **Location**. **Accommodations** emerge as the weakest point among the evaluated aspects. The university also scores well in **Facilities**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, indicating a generally positive student experience.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising professors, career services, and valuable skills gained. The remaining ~7.6% of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and the quality of education.

Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising the community, practical curriculum, and knowledgeable lecturers. Some negative feedback, ~13%, points to administrative issues and inconsistent academic quality.

Around 74% of reviews highlight positive learning experiences, strong business and networking skills, and an international environment. A small percentage (3.1%) of reviews express concerns about academic deception and the educational experience.

Nearly 74% of 54 reviews are positive, highlighting modern teaching methods, spacious campuses, and good career opportunities. A small amount of negative feedback (~3.7%) notes administrative issues and unengaged instructors.

All five reviews are positive, averaging 4.8/5. Students highlight strong inclusivity, diversity, and ample opportunities for involvement and personal growth, with approximately 0% negative feedback.

With an average rating of 4.58/5 from 43 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting supportive, knowledgeable lecturers, practical courses, and a welcoming, multicultural environment. A small ~4.7% of feedback expressed dissatisfaction with staff consistency and internship support.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% giving high ratings. Students highlight an enriching, practical learning experience, international environment, and strong professional preparation. There is no negative feedback.

Rating distribution
5★
27%
23%
55%
36%
80%
72%
73%
4★
45%
45%
29%
62%
20%
21%
23%
3★
21%
19%
13%
18%
0%
2%
3%
2★
4%
6%
3%
2%
0%
2%
0%
1★
4%
6%
1%
2%
0%
2%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Student-Staff relationship

As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.

Its ok

The overall experience was ok. Yet I dont feel that it was worth 10k€ a year for what I received. Starting from repetitive classes in each year but with a different name until not having bathrooms for almost 6 months. The quality of the majority of classes was 2/5. The content of the classes was not deep enough to teach you about tools, appliances, ways of solving, what should be taken into consideration. On my 2 last years. I took the exact same class of public relations but named differently. Not even the professor knew what to say any more. I didn’t saw not event one tool that is used in public relations. We analyzed just one case of public relations in the whole semester. And it was a mention not event a full analysis. I do not recommend GBSB. The internships they say the help you with on their webpage its a lie. They do not help you in any way to connect you with no company. They are not event informed in how to help you with the visa.

The review

ie university is the best university in the world, they education system is the best and infrastructure. It's the best university to put your child to I'm very happy with it i dont wanna lie l. Please go for it

University Review

Excellent university, with experienced professors, professionals in the areas they teach and with an incomparable teacher-student proximity.It is a very good university for International students since thet offer Portuguese classes and some subjects are in English. In terms of infrastructure, despite being small and not having all the conditions and equipment, it brings together a pleasant environment for studying - in addition to very good cleaning conditions and modern rooms. At the administrative level, it is organized. As for the students, many are very interested in being there, excellent students and enormous dedication.

Nothing to show

Supportive Environment, Faculty and Academics

C3S is a very good Institution for International Students. The lecturers here are so enthusiastic and truly passionate about their subjects; their knowledge and encouragement make me feel ready for my future career. At C3S, I really felt like I belonged; the diversity is incredible, and everyone is genuinely kind. Plus, the support systems are really strong. The courses are top-notch, and the learning experience really sets you up for great career opportunities.

Masters international Management

I enjoyed this programe, academically is it similar to other programs in other cities but it offers so much more. The personal connection with professors, strong guidance for future career and the international network is what separates it from other options!

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close