Vilnius University vs Vytautas Magnus University - VDU vs Kaunas University of Technology - KTU vs Aleksandras Stulginskis University - ASU vs SMK College of Applied Sciences - SMK
Side-by-side comparison from 443 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent learning system and accessible study materials
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty and coordinators
- +Strong academic programs with practical training opportunities
- +Flexible study system and course choice
- +Supportive lecturers and international environment
- +Efficient problem-solving and administrative support
- +Practical learning and international opportunities
- +Supportive faculty and welcoming community
- +Development of academic and personal skills
Nothing to show
- +Practical, real-world focused learning with supportive, knowledgeable lecturers
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth through projects and events
- +Modern facilities and a strong sense of community and friendship
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Lack of support and guidance from faculty is a recurring concern.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and student support is frequently cited.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Limited course offerings and a small campus environment are unappealing.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution receives exceptional ratings in several key areas, particularly excelling in **Value** (4.60) and **Professors** (4.58). Student life, location, and internationality also score highly. However, **Accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, receiving a significantly lower rating. Overall, the university demonstrates a strong academic and social environment, with room for improvement in its housing provisions.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Internationality** (4.5) and **Professors** (4.4375), with high marks also for **Location** (4.4375) and **Value** (4.375). While **Facilities** (4.4348) and **Student Life** (4.3404) are also well-regarded, **Accomodation** (4.0417) emerges as the relatively weakest area in this assessment.
This institution demonstrates particularly strong performance in **Location**, receiving its highest rating. Conversely, **Accomodation** represents the lowest-rated aspect of the university experience, though it still garners a respectable score. Other key areas like Facilities, Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and Value all fall within a close, positive range, indicating a generally well-rounded university.
Nothing to show
This university garners high marks in several key areas, most notably its **Location**, which received the highest rating. **Facilities** and **Internationality** also scored very well. **Student Life** and **Value** received solid scores, while **Professors** were also rated favorably. The university's **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~93% of students rating it 4–5 stars. Praised aspects include learning systems, humble and helpful teachers, and an international environment. Minimal negative feedback exists.
With ~85% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.41/5, students highlight a flexible education system, international environment, and supportive lecturers. There is virtually no negative feedback.
With 193 positive reviews and 0 negative reviews, feedback overwhelmingly highlights quality education, supportive faculty, and international opportunities. Students appreciate practical learning and personal skill development, contributing to an average rating of 4.51/5.
Nothing to show
Approximately 96.5% of reviews are positive, praising approachable lecturers, practical, real-world skills, and growth opportunities. One review expressed negative sentiment.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This is one of the best universities in Lithuania right now. After taking admission here, I joined the classes and the learning system impressed me greatly. We have online learning moodle , where we can find everything that is taught in the class also we get all updates and study materials here. We can submit our lab works and assignments here that can helps us to track all the things. Apart from this, we have got humble teachers who are very cooperative and helpful to us. As a non EU student, I feel these things are adorable to me.
Nothing to show
Studying at Kaunas University of Technology has been a really good experience for me so far. I am studying Industrial Engineering Management, and I like how the program combines engineering knowledge with management and business skills. The subjects are practical and useful, especially for understanding how industries and companies work in real life. The teachers are friendly and supportive, and most of them are always ready to help students when needed. I also enjoy the international environment at KTU because I get to meet people from different countries and learn about different cultures. It makes university life more interesting and enjoyable. Another thing I appreciate is that the university focuses not only on theory but also on practical learning, teamwork, and projects. This helps students prepare for future jobs and gain confidence in their skills. Overall, I feel happy to study at Kaunas University of Technology. It is a good university for students who want quality education, personal growth, and better career opportunities in the future.
Nothing to show
I am currently studying in the Tourism and Recreation programme and have completed four semesters. Overall, my experience at SMK College of Applied Sciences has been positive. The programme combines theoretical knowledge with practical activities, helping students understand how the tourism and recreation industry works in real-life situations. The lecturers are generally supportive and willing to help students when needed. Classes cover a variety of topics related to tourism, hospitality, recreation, and business, which provides a broad understanding of the field. I also appreciate the opportunity to work on projects and assignments that encourage teamwork and problem-solving skills. The college has an international environment, allowing students to meet people from different countries and cultures. This makes studying more interesting and helps improve communication skills. One area that could be improved is the organization of some administrative processes, which can occasionally take longer than expected. However, this has not significantly affected my studies. I would recommend SMK College of Applied Sciences to students who are interested in tourism and recreation and are looking for a practical, career-oriented study programme.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
