Vilnius University vs Vytautas Magnus University - VDU vs Kaunas University of Technology - KTU vs Aleksandras Stulginskis University - ASU vs SMK College of Applied Sciences - SMK
Side-by-side comparison from 438 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic programs and learning systems
- +Supportive and cooperative faculty
- +Valuable practical training and real-world skills
- +Flexible studies and course choice
- +Supportive and professional lecturers
- +International environment and community
- +Practical, career-focused programs and supportive, knowledgeable professors.
- +Welcoming international environment and diverse community.
- +Modern facilities and flexible schedules for work-life balance.
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Modern study environment and facilities
- +Balance of theory and practical, real-world application
- +Engaging, practical learning with real-world application
- +Supportive and approachable professors
- +Well-structured curriculum and positive environment
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of career support and opportunities frustrates students.
- -Poor communication and unclear policies.
- -Inadequate resources and outdated facilities.
- -Lack of student support and engagement.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
- -Lack of resources and support for students is a significant concern.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and limited resources are a significant drawback.
- -The university suffers from administrative inefficiencies and poor management.
- -A lack of course variety and limited English-taught programs are disappointing.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of support and unclear communication from staff is a common complaint.
Nothing to show
Overall, the university receives positive feedback, with its strongest areas being **Value** (4.61) and **Professors** (4.60). **Location** (4.58) and **Internationality** (4.46) also score highly. The **Accomodation** (3.69) stands out as the weakest performing category, while **Facilities** (4.40) and **Student Life** (4.45) are rated moderately well.
This university demonstrates a robust performance across most surveyed aspects. **Internationality** and **Facilities** stand out as its strongest areas, both scoring very highly. **Professors**, **Location**, and **Value** also receive commendations. The primary area for potential improvement appears to be **Accomodation**, which, while still positive, is rated lower than other categories. **Student Life** is also a strong point, though slightly below the top performers.
Analyzing the provided ratings, the institution excels in its **Location**, achieving the highest score. It also demonstrates considerable strengths in **Facilities** and **Professors**. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest rating, indicating an area for potential improvement compared to other aspects of the university experience. The remaining categories like Student Life, Internationality, and Value fall within a generally positive range.
Nothing to show
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with location and student life receiving particularly high marks. Facilities and internationality are also rated strongly. Areas for improvement are accommodation, which is the weakest aspect, and value, which is moderately rated. Professors and facilities also show solid scores, contributing to a generally favorable university experience.
This institution demonstrates particular strengths in its **professors** and **student life**, both receiving very high marks. **Facilities** and **value** also score exceptionally well. Conversely, **location**, **accommodation**, and **internationality** are areas that received comparatively lower ratings, suggesting potential for improvement in these specific aspects.
Nothing to show
With 150 reviews, this university is highly praised, earning an average of 4.62/5. ~99% of feedback is positive, highlighting excellent learning systems, humble teachers, and a strong academic reputation. One negative review was received.
~97% of students provided positive feedback, highlighting a flexible study system, international environment, and supportive lecturers. No negative reviews were recorded.
With a 4.51/5 average, ~94% of reviews are positive, praising high-quality education, approachable professors, practical skills, and a friendly international environment. Zero negative reviews were recorded.
Nothing to show
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting approachable lecturers, practical skills focus, and modern facilities. A single negative review (~3.7%) mentioned the institution being small.
With a 4.8/5 average rating, reviews are ~100% positive. Students praise the mind-blowing environment, friendly professors, and practical curriculum. Some noted occasional teaching weaknesses in English for international students.
Nothing to show
For me, Vilnius University is well known & best University in whole Europe. Many international students are studying here.They are really making friendly rules for EU students though which is not applicable for Non EU students.There are lot of students from Asia & Africa continent's.As we know meximum things are different in these continent's, so they are facing huge problems after coming here for every case. In abroad, I think University's are like a family for us, so they should make some rules for us, which can release our academic & mental pressure, such as academic leave for a semester or a year.Now we can take the academic leave though I don’t think It’s the perfect way for non Eu students. So I am requesting that Universities should consider these matters for Non Eu students. Without these I love my University.
Nothing to show
Studying at Kaunas University of Technology has been a really good experience for me so far. I am studying Industrial Engineering Management, and I like how the program combines engineering knowledge with management and business skills. The subjects are practical and useful, especially for understanding how industries and companies work in real life. The teachers are friendly and supportive, and most of them are always ready to help students when needed. I also enjoy the international environment at KTU because I get to meet people from different countries and learn about different cultures. It makes university life more interesting and enjoyable. Another thing I appreciate is that the university focuses not only on theory but also on practical learning, teamwork, and projects. This helps students prepare for future jobs and gain confidence in their skills. Overall, I feel happy to study at Kaunas University of Technology. It is a good university for students who want quality education, personal growth, and better career opportunities in the future.
Nothing to show
I am currently studying in the Tourism and Recreation programme and have completed four semesters. Overall, my experience at SMK College of Applied Sciences has been positive. The programme combines theoretical knowledge with practical activities, helping students understand how the tourism and recreation industry works in real-life situations. The lecturers are generally supportive and willing to help students when needed. Classes cover a variety of topics related to tourism, hospitality, recreation, and business, which provides a broad understanding of the field. I also appreciate the opportunity to work on projects and assignments that encourage teamwork and problem-solving skills. The college has an international environment, allowing students to meet people from different countries and cultures. This makes studying more interesting and helps improve communication skills. One area that could be improved is the organization of some administrative processes, which can occasionally take longer than expected. However, this has not significantly affected my studies. I would recommend SMK College of Applied Sciences to students who are interested in tourism and recreation and are looking for a practical, career-oriented study programme.
My experience at the university has been generally positive, especially because of its practical approach to learning. The classes are more focused on real-world application rather than only theory, which helps me understand how things work in actual job situations. Some professors are very supportive and explain topics clearly, always willing to help when students have questions. However, there are also a few classes where the teaching could be more engaging and better organized. What stood out to me the most is the multicultural environment and the opportunity to meet students from different countries. This really helped me grow personally and improve my communication skills. Campus life is decent, but I think more student activities and events could make it even better and more enjoyable. Overall, I would recommend this university to future students who prefer practical learning and an international environment, but I also believe there is still room for improvement in teaching consistency and student engagement.
Nothing to show
