Student review [#100176] for Accounting and Taxation
at Milpark Education

Application & Communication Issues
The enrolment process began with significant gaps in communication. The student advisor failed to adequately explain institutional procedures, particularly regarding the exemption application process for prior qualifications. This omission proved costly, as the acceptance letter presented modules without clearly indicating they represented only first-year requirements or that separate exemption applications were necessary for previous learning credits.
Curriculum Instability
Milpark demonstrated concerning flexibility in altering degree requirements. Midway through studies, notification arrived that subject requirements for the degree had changed, with additional modules added. Following a major switch to a more aligned degree program, a two-month delay in exemption processing only resolved after formal complaint escalation. Even then, notification indicated pending curriculum changes were blocking full exemption grants.
Administrative & Service Concerns
Communication channels proved consistently inadequate. Telephone inquiries routinely resulted in referrals rather than resolutions, with staff frequently unable to address queries directly. Additional costs for transcripts—including delivery fees with electronic distribution refused—compound the already premium pricing structure relative to other South African distance learning institutions.
Final Assessment
The overall experience suggests an institution prioritizing revenue through module accumulation over student progression efficiency. ICB diploma holders receive limited credit recognition, effectively requiring near-complete degree repetition despite prior three-year qualifications. Combined with poor communication responsiveness, administrative friction, and high costs, prospective students should carefully evaluate whether Milpark’s value proposition aligns with their educational investment expectations.