RISEBA University vs Turiba University vs EKA University of Applied Sciences vs Ventspils University of Applied Sciences - VUAS vs Baltic International academy - BIA

Side-by-side comparison from 21 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
RISEBA University: wins 0/1 categories
Turiba University: wins 1/1 categories
EKA University of Applied Sciences: wins 0/1 categories
Ventspils University of Applied Sciences - VUAS: wins 0/1 categories
Baltic International academy - BIA: wins 0/1 categories
Transport and Telecommunication Institute - TSI: wins 0/1 categories
Daugavpils University - DU: wins 0/1 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Communication Management
Best programme: International Communication
Best programme: Management Science
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Best programme: English Language and Philology
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
5.00
3.20
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.09
Location
5.00
5.00
3.40
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
4.09
Professors
5.00
5.00
3.80
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
3.73
Internationality
5.00
5.00
3.20
Not rated
Not rated
2.50
3.64
Student life
5.00
5.00
2.60
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
4.00
Value
5.00
5.00
2.60
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Accommodation
4.00
5.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.90
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Flexible study schedules and international opportunities
  • +Interactive learning with dedicated and supportive professors
  • +Good facilities and English-taught programs
  • +Quality of education and engaging courses
  • +Convenient and pleasant campus environment
  • +Well-organized educational process
  • +Recognised degree and career success
  • +Helpful, knowledgeable faculty and flexible schedule
  • +Affordable study and European exposure

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Strong IT, logistics, and engineering programs
  • +Practical knowledge and industry-experienced professors
  • +Up-to-date infrastructure and labs
  • +Supportive and approachable faculty
  • +Welcoming and friendly atmosphere
  • +Well-structured programs with practical relevance
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are major drawbacks.
  • -Poor teaching quality and unclear academic expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
  • -Lack of career support and unclear future prospects are disappointing.
  • -Exploitative financial practices and lack of genuine academic concern are major issues.
  • -The university treats students poorly and offers a subpar educational experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated and insufficient facilities are a major concern.
  • -The administrative and management team consistently fails to address student concerns effectively.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and disconnected from real-world applications.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are perceived as ineffective.
Rating summary
What students say

Across several key metrics, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and internationality all received a perfect score of five. The only area not reaching the highest mark was accommodation, rated at a still solid four. Overall, the university offers a highly positive experience with excellent value for its students.

Receiving top marks across the board, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength in every evaluated area. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated a perfect 5 out of 5. There are no discernible weak areas based on these ratings, indicating a consistently outstanding experience for students.

Considering the provided ratings, the university demonstrates its strongest performance in the area of **Professors**, achieving a score of 3.8. Conversely, **Student Life** and **Value** emerged as the weakest aspects, both receiving a score of 2.6. Other evaluated categories like Facilities, Location, Accommodation, and Internationality fell within a moderate range.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a mixed performance, this institution excels in its **Location**, earning a near-perfect score. **Facilities** and **Professors** also receive strong marks, indicating good resources and faculty. However, **Student Life** and **Internationality** show room for improvement. **Accomodation** is a significant weakness, receiving no rating, and **Value** is rated moderately.

This institution receives high marks in several key areas, with Facilities and Location both scoring an impressive 4.09. Student Life and Value are also well-regarded at 4.0 and 4.0 respectively. Accommodations are rated at 3.9. The weakest performing areas are Professors, at 3.73, and Internationality, at 3.64.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.5/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise the good teaching level, professor support, and international opportunities. Programs taught in English and interactive learning environments are also highlighted.

With a 5/5 average rating from one review, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. This feedback highlights a pleasant campus, organized education, and satisfying quality of knowledge.

Approximately 40% of reviews are positive, praising program recognition, helpful faculty, and flexible schedules. About 20% of feedback is negative, citing concerns about student treatment and perceived financial exploitation.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 rating from two reviews, students highly praise TSI, particularly for IT, logistics, and engineering programs. They highlight practical knowledge, experienced professors, and up-to-date facilities. No negative feedback was received.

Approximately 64% of reviews are positive, highlighting a welcoming atmosphere and knowledgeable, supportive lecturers. Some mention administrative processes can be slow, with limited career support.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
100%
20%
0%
0%
100%
45%
4★
50%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
18%
3★
0%
0%
40%
0%
0%
0%
36%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Fine

The easiest way to begin with Europe Pretty cheap to study and possible to know more about the European institutions I d strictly recomend it to all the EU newcomers Facilitators are really about to give some Impact to students

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close