Uludag University vs Global Humanistic University - GHU vs Catholic University of Salta - UCASAL vs Walter Sisulu University vs Jinnah University for Women - JUW

Side-by-side comparison from 82 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: New Anglia University (5.00)
Uludag University: wins 0/3 categories
Global Humanistic University - GHU: wins 0/3 categories
Catholic University of Salta - UCASAL: wins 0/3 categories
Walter Sisulu University: wins 0/3 categories
Jinnah University for Women - JUW: wins 0/3 categories
University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce iSM: wins 0/3 categories
New Anglia University: wins 3/3 categories
Comparing
Bursa, Turkey
3.60
Read more reviews
10 reviews
×
Best programme: BS Industrial Engineering
Best programme: PhD in Business Administration
Best programme: Bachelor of International Studies
East London, South Africa
4.20
Read more reviews
33 reviews
×
Best programme: Public Relations and Media
Anguilla, Anguilla
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
18 reviews
×
Best programme: Medicine
Category ratings
Facilities
3.40
4.33
5.00
3.97
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Location
4.10
4.50
5.00
3.30
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Professors
3.50
4.68
4.00
3.97
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
3.50
4.68
3.50
3.55
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Student life
3.70
4.33
4.00
4.20
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
3.40
4.84
5.00
4.21
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Accommodation
3.50
4.63
5.00
3.47
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High quality education and skilled faculty
  • +Numerous opportunities for skill development and experience
  • +Accessible campus with good facilities and affordable living
  • +Flexible online learning model
  • +Academic rigor and intellectual challenge
  • +Supportive faculty and administration
  • +Updated and relevant program content
  • +Supportive and accessible faculty
  • +Well-resourced library and effective virtual learning environment
  • +Personal growth and skill development
  • +Engaging and well-structured learning experiences
  • +Supportive and friendly campus environment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +strong pre-med foundation for medical school
  • +comprehensive science curriculum for medical careers
  • +supportive learning environment with practical resources
Cons
  • -Poor social life and negative professor interactions.
  • -Substandard educational quality and unclear graduation requirements.
  • -Inadequate facilities.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective teaching and curriculum lead to poor educational outcomes.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of communication and transparency frustrates students.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant delays and lack of student support.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Communication from the university is poor and dismissive of student concerns.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of support are recurring problems.
Rating summary
What students say

This university performs strongest in terms of Location, achieving a notable rating of 4.11. Student Life and Accommodation also received solid scores. Conversely, the weakest areas appear to be Internationality and Value, both falling below 3.5. Facilities and Professors' ratings are on par, indicating average performance across these aspects.

An analysis of the university's ratings reveals a stark contrast between its strengths and weaknesses. The institution excels in **Value** (4.84), **Professors** (4.68), and **Internationality** (4.68). Conversely, **Location** (1.89), **Accomodation** (1.95), and **Student Life** (2.05) received significantly lower scores, indicating areas that may require improvement. Facilities are rated moderately at 2.74.

This institution achieves excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, location, and accommodation all received perfect scores, indicating exceptional quality. Student life and professors are also highly rated. The weakest aspect appears to be internationality, with a score of 3.5. Overall, the university presents a strong offering, particularly in its physical resources and accessibility, with excellent perceived value.

This university's student feedback indicates a strong performance in **Student Life** and **Value**, both scoring 4.2 and above. **Facilities** and **Professors** also received high marks, close to 4.0. Conversely, **Location** and **Accomodation** are areas for improvement, with lower scores. **Internationality** sits in the mid-range. Overall, the university excels in student experience and perceived worth, with physical campus aspects and housing needing attention.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Across all surveyed categories, this institution garners perfect scores. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received the highest possible rating of 5. This indicates an exceptionally well-rounded university experience with no discernible weak areas based on this feedback.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 3.6/5 average rating, 50% of reviews are positive, highlighting a great campus, high educational quality, and good opportunities. Approximately 20% of feedback is negative, mentioning weak social life and professor issues.

Nearly all reviews are positive, with students praising academic rigor, challenging coursework, and flexible online learning. Supervisors and the platform are also frequently highlighted as supportive and effective.

With a 4.5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students highlight the updated program content focusing on new technologies and media. They praise excellent professor support and quick assignment feedback, alongside an extensive library.

~97% of reviews are positive, highlighting personal growth, valuable learning experiences, and enjoyable campus life. A very small percentage of feedback (~3%) expresses frustration with administrative responsiveness.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

All 18 reviews are positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students appreciate the pre-med program's structured approach and scientific subject mix, preparing them for medical school and a future career in medicine.

Rating distribution
5★
30%
84%
50%
42%
0%
0%
100%
4★
20%
11%
50%
42%
0%
0%
0%
3★
30%
5%
0%
12%
0%
0%
0%
2★
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Work-Life and Education Balance

I am a PhD student at Global Humanistic University. I chose GHU because of its flexible and balanced learning model of online education. With the busy schedules of my entrepreneurial journey, GHU has offered me an effective education model which aligns with my aspiration of right balance between professional work, education, and family. My supervisor and the administration team are effective in their communication which makes learning and coordination hustle free. I recommend GHU for professionals who desire to enhance their education.

Nothing to show

Studying at a rural university

Walter Sisulu University is a rural university that offers accessibility to students from mostly underprivileged backgrounds. Some of its facilities and processes showed this. However, it is well known for its excellent medical programmes. My experience was mostly positve albeit with a few glitches here and there. Overall, I would recommend it as I myself am planning to go back for my Master's degree.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close