Federal University of Technology - UTFPR vs Universidad Nihon Gakko - UNG vs Universidad Técnica de Comercialización y Desarrollo - UTCD vs Institute of Ecology, Economics and Law vs Université du Québec à Montréal - UQAM

Side-by-side comparison from 30 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Federal University of Technology - UTFPR (5.00)
Federal University of Technology - UTFPR: wins 2/7 categories
Universidad Nihon Gakko - UNG: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Técnica de Comercialización y Desarrollo - UTCD: wins 0/7 categories
Institute of Ecology, Economics and Law: wins 0/7 categories
Université du Québec à Montréal - UQAM: wins 0/7 categories
Luxury Connect Business School - LCBS: wins 0/7 categories
University of the CommonWealth Caribbean - UCC: wins 5/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Fernando de La Mora, Paraguay
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Auditing
Best programme: Business Administration
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.94
Not rated
4.63
Win
Location
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.60
Not rated
4.25
Professors
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.28
Not rated
4.40
Win
Internationality
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.06
Not rated
4.50
Win
Student life
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.24
Not rated
4.13
Value
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.83
Not rated
4.50
Win
Accommodation
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.06
Not rated
4.29
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic programs and dedicated teachers
  • +Ample extracurricular opportunities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Approachable and qualified professors with effective teaching methods.
  • +Practical, career-focused learning and development of useful skills.
  • +Strong student support and integration for international students.

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and accessible faculty and staff
  • +Flexible learning options and quality academic programs
  • +Positive and immersive educational experience
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of engagement and relevance in course content disappoints students.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Lack of support and poor communication from the university.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are consistently described as outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content and teaching quality often fail to meet expectations.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **location** and **student life**, both receiving perfect scores. **Professors**, **internationality**, and **value** are also highly rated, indicating a positive overall experience in these areas. However, **facilities** and **accommodation** are areas for potential improvement, scoring lower than other aspects of the university.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Among surveyed categories, this institution excels in **Location** with a rating of 4.6, followed closely by **Professors** at 4.28 and **Student Life** at 4.24. The **Value** for money emerges as the comparatively weaker area, scoring 3.83. Ratings for Facilities, Accomodation, and Internationality are all solid, falling between 3.9 and 4.1.

Nothing to show

This institution receives excellent marks across the board, with its **Facilities** standing out as the highest-rated area. **Internationality** and **Value** also garnered strong scores. The **Location** and **Accomodation** are well-regarded, followed closely by **Professors**. **Student Life** received the lowest, though still positive, rating, indicating an area for potential enhancement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with a 5/5 average rating. The single review highlights strong academics and good teachers, noting that while challenging, it offers numerous extracurricular opportunities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 4.32 average rating, nearly all (~95%) of 19 reviews are positive. Students praise approachable, qualified professors and enjoyable, practical teaching methods. One review noted a lack of support.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.4/5, ~90% of 10 reviews are positive. Students highlight excellent customer service, responsive staff, and helpful faculty as recurring themes. No negative feedback was reported.

Rating distribution
5★
100%
0%
0%
0%
47%
0%
50%
4★
0%
0%
0%
0%
42%
0%
40%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
0%
10%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Université du Québec à Montréal

After considering UQAM for my studies, I ultimately decided against it due to the lack of support I experienced. While the university's programs seemed promising, the insufficient support infrastructure made me hesitant to commit. The limited communication channels and slow response times left me feeling uncertain about my ability to navigate challenges effectively. Ultimately, I chose to pursue my education elsewhere, where I felt confident in the support system provided.

Nothing to show

Great experience

This university is moderately okay I would recommend it. It offers a lot of opportunities other from jus going on campus to learn. You can network with others, get involved in various activities and also form Study groups to help each other.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close