Indian Institute of Management Calcutta - IIMC vs St Xavier's College vs University of Calcutta vs Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology vs Ecole Intuit Lab

Side-by-side comparison from 43 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Vidyasagar University (5.00)
Indian Institute of Management Calcutta - IIMC: wins 0/6 categories
St Xavier's College: wins 1/6 categories
University of Calcutta: wins 0/6 categories
Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology: wins 0/6 categories
Ecole Intuit Lab: wins 0/6 categories
Vidyasagar University: wins 5/6 categories
IEM Kolkata - IEM Kolkata: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration Management and Marketing
Best programme: Economics and Statistics
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Marseille, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Botany
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.29
4.09
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Location
4.00
5.00
4.87
3.57
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Professors
4.00
4.57
4.39
4.29
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
2.50
3.43
3.30
3.14
Not rated
4.50
Win
Not rated
Student life
3.00
4.00
4.22
4.14
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Value
3.50
5.00
Win
4.39
3.86
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
Accommodation
3.50
3.43
3.70
3.43
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Exceptional education and practical learning experiences
  • +Strong industry connections and placement opportunities
  • +Prestigious reputation and high-quality faculty
  • +Top-notch faculty and academic excellence
  • +Conducive environment for holistic development
  • +Strong placement assistance
  • +Experienced and supportive faculty
  • +Rich academic legacy and learning environment
  • +Vibrant campus life and extracurricular activities
  • +Excellent and supportive faculty
  • +Vibrant campus life and activities
  • +Strong technical education and infrastructure

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive learning environment and friendly professors
  • +Scenic campus and nature-focused programs
  • +Contributions to regional development

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a common source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
  • -Limited career support and unclear future prospects are a significant concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a common complaint.
  • -Ineffective teaching and unsupportive faculty are frequently mentioned.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including lack of campus and attendance policies.
  • -Poor university affiliation leading to a negative overall experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Inconsistent or unclear communication from instructors and staff.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, achieving solid ratings of 4 across facilities, professors, and location. Student life and accommodation are also viewed positively, with scores of 3 and 3.5 respectively. The university's weakest areas appear to be its internationality, receiving a 2.5 rating, and its value proposition, which also scored 3.5.

With exceptional scores, this institution excels in both **Location** and **Value**, both receiving perfect marks. **Professors** also garnered a very high rating. Conversely, the university's **Accomodation** and **Internationality** present areas for improvement, with the lowest scores in these categories. Facilities and student life received solid, above-average ratings.

Across several key metrics, this university demonstrates a strong performance. Its highest-rated aspects include Location, scoring an impressive 4.87, closely followed by Professors and Value, both at 4.39. Student Life also receives a commendable rating of 4.22. The weakest area appears to be Internationality, with a score of 3.30, and Accomodation, rated at 3.70.

This institution receives positive marks across multiple facets. Its strongest areas are its Professors and Student Life, both scoring above 4. The University also fares well in Facilities and Value. Areas requiring further attention include Internationality and Accomodation, which are rated the lowest. Location also shows room for improvement.

Nothing to show

Consistently high marks across the board indicate a well-rounded institution. The university excels in core aspects like facilities, professors, location, student life, and accommodation, all receiving a perfect score. Internationality and value for money are also strong, noted at 4.5. This suggests a particularly positive experience for students in terms of campus resources, academic quality, and campus community.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.5/5 and 3 out of 4 reviews being positive, students praise the prestigious education, exceptional practical learning, and strong placement opportunities. No negative feedback was recorded.

With a 4.86/5 average, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students praise top-notch professors, strong academic competition, dedicated placement cells, and an environment conducive to overall development.

Most students praise the strong academic environment, supportive faculty, and good learning atmosphere, reflected in a 4.17/5 average rating. A small percentage express dissatisfaction with infrastructure and student politics.

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~86% of reviews rating it 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.14/5. Students highlight good faculty and infrastructure, though one review mentioned weak placements.

Nothing to show

Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight a supportive learning environment, friendly professors, and a suitable campus for nature and environmental studies.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
75%
86%
48%
29%
0%
100%
0%
4★
0%
14%
26%
57%
0%
0%
0%
3★
25%
0%
22%
14%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close