The LNM Institute of Information Technology - LNMIIT vs Syracuse University vs Adichunchanagiri University - ACU vs Schellhammer Business School vs Fayetteville State University
Side-by-side comparison from 43 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Updated, industry-relevant academic curriculum and expert faculty
- +Strong coding culture and project work, fostering skill development
- +Excellent infrastructure and supportive student/senior community
- +Challenging yet rewarding academics with supportive and qualified professors.
- +Abundant extracurricular activities and diverse opportunities for personal growth.
- +Welcoming environment and strong sense of community with good student resources.
- +Engaging teaching and accessible instructors
- +Relevant and practical curriculum
- +Supportive learning environment and community
- +International environment and diverse professors
- +Attractive location and lifestyle
- +Engaging lectures and beneficial academic programs
- +Welcoming atmosphere & supportive professors
- +Strong academic programs
- +Conducive learning environment
- +Supportive staff & faculty investment
- +Engaging teaching & effective career support
- +Good campus life & modern facilities
- +Vibrant campus life and student involvement
- +Positive student experience and community atmosphere
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and lacks practical application.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a recurring problem.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and research.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff causes frustration.
- -Administrative and management issues lead to inconsistent practices and poor communication.
- -Lack of accreditation and recognition invalidates degrees and wastes money.
- -Unreliable course delivery and abrupt program changes disregard student efforts.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content and teaching methods are perceived as unengaging and irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
- -Limited career support and unclear future prospects are a major concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as ineffective.
This institution demonstrates a remarkably strong performance across multiple facets, with near-perfect scores for facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, all receiving a 4 out of 5. Its weakest area, though still respectable, is location, earning a 3.5. This suggests a well-rounded educational experience with particular strengths in academic and extracurricular offerings, as well as overall affordability and a global outlook.
This institution achieves outstanding scores in Facilities and Student Life, both receiving perfect marks. Accommodation and Internationality also stand out with impressive ratings. Professors are highly regarded, and the Value proposition is strong. Location, while still good, is the relatively weakest area compared to other aspects.
Offering a middle-ground experience, this institution shines in its facilities, professor quality, and perceived value, all receiving a solid 3. However, it faces significant challenges in location and internationality, both scoring a low 1. Student life and accommodation fall in the middle, with ratings of 2 and 3 respectively.
Analysis of university ratings reveals a varied picture. The institution excels in **Internationality**, receiving a strong 2.89. Conversely, **Value** is the weakest area, scoring a low 1.67. Other aspects, including Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accommodation, fall within a similar moderate range, generally around the 2.0 mark.
Across all assessed aspects, this institution demonstrates outstanding performance. It achieves a perfect score of 5 out of 5 in every category, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. This indicates a consistently excellent offering with no discernible weakest areas among the evaluated metrics.
This institution garners positive feedback across most areas, with its **strongest performances in Internationality and Value**, both scoring 3.625. Professors also receive a commendable rating of 3.8125. Conversely, **Facilities represent the weakest area**, averaging a score of 2.647. Student life, accommodation, and location fall within a moderate range, indicating generally satisfactory but not exceptional experiences in these aspects.
Overall, this institution demonstrates a strong academic and campus experience, with excellent ratings in Facilities, Professors, Location, and Student Life, all scoring a 4. Its strongest area is Value, achieving an impressive 4.5. The university's Accommodation and Internationality received solid, though slightly lower, scores of 3.5, representing areas for potential development.
With 100% positive sentiment and an average rating of 4.2/5, students highlight strong academics, good infrastructure, and a supportive environment. The university is praised for producing talented engineers and offering industry-level projects.
All nine reviews are positive, resulting in an average rating of 4.78/5. Students praise the beautiful campus, rewarding academics, and abundant opportunities. Professors are highlighted as excellent and supportive.
The sole review, rated 2/5, is negative. It highlights concerns about the university's recent establishment and suggests that while the affiliated medical college meets educational standards, practical aspects and clinical exposure could be improved.
Negative feedback dominates, with ~56% of reviews expressing significant dissatisfaction regarding academic recognition and inconsistent practices. Positive comments highlight location and international atmosphere.
The single review is overwhelmingly positive, rating the university 5/5. Students highlight an inviting atmosphere, understanding professors, strong programs, and a home-like environment. No negative feedback was received.
A high percentage of positive feedback (around 69%) highlights supportive staff, engaging teaching, and good campus life. Some note theoretical focus and stress as areas for improvement.
With an average rating of 4/5, feedback indicates a positive university experience, highlighted by enjoyable campus life and student involvement. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I have just done my Masters at SBS (MA in Organisational Psychology) and below I want to provide the full, unfortunately not so positive, picture. I have no clue where all the positive reviews are coming from – most likely they are paying for them as 99% of them do not reflect reality at all. As it doesn't fit in 1 review, I will split it, to offer the full picture. Contact me if you’d like to know more. Let's start positively – I have met several very knowledgeable and nice people among the teachers. Some are truly willing to teach you and help you grow. But do note that these people are not paid enough and outside of their actual teaching hours which means you will receive little to no support outside class unless the teacher is willing to go the extra mile with no compensation. This is where the „positives“ end. Organisationally – tuition fees are unclear, they will charge you whatever they can get away with based on your nationality (e.g. Mozambique 700eur to Netherlands 12000eur so quite the range) and you will find out randomly when you talk to your peers after enrolling. This will be labelled as „scholarship“ but it doesn’t have anything to do with your previous grades or performance. Everything is payable as opposed to standard practice in serious academic institutions - for example if you need thesis deadline extension, it is, of course, possible - for about 2K EUR. Everything and anything you pay them is non-refundable, of course. There is also insanely high staff turnover, as usually the better teachers leave the moment they find a better job in the area - often these teachers must teach there because the job market in Malaga/Cadiz province is ridiculously saturated and it is not easy to find another employment. Career days are a joke – people from hotels come to recruit cheap labour (600eur/month internship or unpaid at all) but no real professional opportunities are offered – if by some miracle you find anything suitable for you, the uni will charge you money as they have „provided“ you with this opportunity. Personally I was advised and referred several times by a staff member who went the extra mile with my CV and job applications but this is not the norm, as they definitely don't have the resources to do this for everyone. Academically – they should not have the right to call themselves a higher educational institution. There is no clear curriculum, they are changing subjects all the time – if you dared to apply it will certainly not be the same subjects as are listed on the website. For which they have a little legal note written there but that is just to cover their behinds obviously. Teachers are preparing their own syllabus with almost a free-hand, often far from what would be challenging on an actual Masters academical level. Unfortunately, AI use for cheating purposes is not strictly punished - oftentimes students will get away with it despite the instructors' full awareness of this practice, as the instructors do not have the resources to penalise everyone for it as would be the standard practice in any other reputable academic institution. It's very demotivating to be putting in organic, honest work while many just pass by using AI for every single thought they're supposed to produce scot-free. Language classes are a joke – they do not offer ANY of the languages listed online as they do not have the teachers for them. There is a Spanish class – divided between beginners and those who have already come across it, so if you’d think of improving your Spanish from B2 and higher level - don‘t even think about it as the „non-beginner“ class will not be challenging enough by far. There are English classes which are „mandatory“ for students with lack of English skills but again, no courses on e.g. Business English provided, which are a standard at other universities. Thesis writing is an absolute chaos. The guidelines are extremely vague and sometimes conflicting with what is said in class. Do not expect actual academic support – you will choose your topic and you’ll be asigned „Thesis Advisor“ which will be one of the underpaid teachers who will NOT be informed of this assignment and thus will NOT be compensated for it (as they are only paid for teaching hours and not full-time). This means that depending on your TA you will either receive some minor support out of the potential „goodness“ of the specific teacher but in reality, all is decided and „reviewed“ by the Dean - currently Prof. Sousa. „Reviewed“ is because he will only judge based on whether you have followed their template mainly regarding formatting but not content. Which means when you ask for feedback on your 60 page document you’ll often receive „Please follow the template“ which will get your thesis to „passing“ grade but if you want to actually better yourself in academic research and writing, don’t expect that here since their regular procedure doesn't strive to help every student get to their best. Grading is thus based not on content or someone actually thoroughly reading your thesis (nor there are clear grading guidelines as is more than common in other universities). Facilities – the building on campus is okay, but doesn‘t reflect the tuition amount at all. It is far from everything which means you either have to pay for school bus (expensive), figure out Spanish public transport (bus is about 7min walk) or have a car/motorcycle. There is a cafe on campus which is owned by the owners of SBS with a minor discount for SBS students but that means that there is not even a microwave or water kettle available for students - so that they would go spend money in that cafe if they want to have hot meal during their day. For people considering to apply: please be warned – if you can choose another institution for your development, do so. This university will not challenge you academically nor professionaly. It is a deceiving marketing practice at the very least – scam is the correct word unfortunately. Students that were seen sleeping/obviously using AI to answer absolutely basic (definitely not Masters level of knowledge required) questions asked by teachers IN CLASS then use AI to write on their LinkedIn how enriching and challenging this experience was after their graduation. Moreover, the university praises and advocates for the above mentioned fake social media behaviour even though they are well-aware of the scam they are running and the quality of students they enroll – no entrance exams required, of course. In fact, the university administration used AI to prepare their graduation speech for last year :) Make of that what you will. If you have applied and now cannot go back as you would loose all the tuition fees paid: challenge yourself during this time. Make sure to do all your courses diligently so that you can make the most out of this experience focusing on your academic growth. Ask an external thesis advisor to guide you if you want to actually improve your academic research and writing skills. Do the voluntary tasks during the courses, ask the teachers you deem knowledgeable and interesting for more info about their field of expertise, additional literature etc. You have to make it count yourself, as no one else will in this place – once you paid, your growth and development is irrelevant to the university with the exception of a few staff members that care. I have also submitted this review via Google, see how they don't reply as opposed to the positive ones, because they know all of the above is true :)
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show