Universidad Anáhuac vs University of Toronto - UofT vs Universidad Panamericana vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School vs Ironhack

Side-by-side comparison from 352 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Anáhuac (4.60)
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 3/7 categories
University of Toronto - UofT: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Panamericana: wins 1/7 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Ironhack: wins 3/7 categories
Cestar College of Business, Health & Technology: wins 0/7 categories
Autonomous University of Chiapas - UNACH: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Cancun, Mexico
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
33 reviews
×
Best programme: Communication
Best programme: Psychology
Aguascalientes, Mexico
4.10
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Best programme: Architecture
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
4.19
4.33
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
2.50
Location
4.50
4.38
4.25
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
Professors
4.41
4.15
4.50
Win
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
3.50
Internationality
4.59
Win
4.42
3.33
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
3.00
Student life
4.63
3.80
3.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.50
Value
4.63
Win
4.24
4.33
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
4.66
Win
3.83
3.75
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
3.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Leadership and values development
  • +Academic excellence and practical application
  • +Supportive community and modern facilities
  • +Strong academic programs and career-focused opportunities
  • +Welcoming campus community and extensive networking
  • +Prestigious reputation and global perspective
  • +Highly qualified professors and academic excellence
  • +Strong business programs and professional connections
  • +Personalized attention and strong sense of community

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format

Nothing to show

  • +Nature-surrounded campus and qualified professors
  • +Modern facilities and technological resources
  • +Encouragement of social and community impact projects
Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.
  • -Administrative and management issues lead to understaffed services and long wait times.
  • -Outdated facilities and overpriced amenities detract from the student experience.
  • -An overemphasis on research, coupled with a lack of practical learning and career support, is disappointing.
  • -Intellectualism is perceived as cultish.
  • -Institutions are seen as unreliable sources of truth.
  • -There's a critique of seeking purpose through complex language and power.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from faculty and staff are common complaints.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.

This university garners high marks, particularly excelling in Internationality (4.42) and Location (4.38). Value (4.24) and Facilities (4.19) also received strong scores. The areas with the lowest ratings, though still respectable, are Student Life (3.79) and Accomodation (3.83). Professors (4.15) are rated favorably, contributing to an overall positive assessment.

The university is highly rated for its professors, achieving a strong 4.5. Facilities and value also score well, both at 4.33. Student life, while respectable at 3.67, and accommodation at 3.75 represent areas where ratings are somewhat lower. Internationality is rated the lowest among all categories at 3.33.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in several areas, notably its **Value** at 4, alongside solid scores for **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation**, all rated at 3.5. Areas for improvement are evident in its **Facilities**, which received the lowest rating of 2.5. The university also scores moderately in **Location** and **Internationality**, both at 3.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.

With an average rating of 4.2/5, ~98.3% of reviews are positive, praising academic programs, networking, and campus life. A small percentage of negative feedback notes concerns with student services and teaching quality.

University students praise academic excellence, professor quality, and modern facilities. ~92% of feedback is positive, with one reviewer expressing concerns about intellectualism.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

Nothing to show

With a 3.5/5 average rating, ~50% of feedback is positive, praising the university's natural campus setting, qualified professors, and modern facilities. No negative reviews were provided.

Rating distribution
5★
67%
37%
33%
0%
50%
0%
0%
4★
39%
48%
58%
0%
0%
0%
50%
3★
3%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
2★
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
8%
0%
50%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

PhD Psyc

The program itself is great and really prepares you for an academic career, but the quality of the supervisors varies a lot. Some people in the department are excellent and enjoy empowering their students, but the majority of profs make you feel like they're doing you a favour by giving you their time of day/guidance. Might be an issue exclusively with this department, but still. And the campus is cool! Great cheap eats around. Shout out to El Rey for when you want to splurge a bit and get some awesome tacos!

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close