National Research University Higher School of Economics - HSE vs Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University - SPbPU vs Moscow International Higher Business School - MIRBIS vs Eurasian Management and Administration School vs Center for Creative Leadership
Side-by-side comparison from 110 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High academic quality & skilled faculty
- +Global outlook & diverse programs
- +Career opportunities & strong network
- +Advanced labs and modern equipment
- +Highly qualified and involved teaching staff
- +Diverse academic and extracurricular development opportunities
Nothing to show
- +Practical, results-driven business education
- +Actionable assignments and real-world application
- +Experienced professors and industry insights
- +Student-centered support and inclusivity
- +Welcoming and understanding community
Nothing to show
- +Engaging subjects and knowledgeable professors
- +Solid theoretical background
- +Lack of practical experience
- -Administrative and management issues hinder student support.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and subjective academic processes are problematic.
- -Unrealistic exam difficulty and demanding workloads cause frustration.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Ineffective teaching methods and curriculum design are problematic.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or poorly maintained.
- -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and resources
- -Lack of clear communication and organization
This institution demonstrates a particularly strong showing in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. Value and Professors are also highly regarded. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest score among the evaluated aspects. The university also scores well in Internationality, Facilities, and Student Life, indicating a generally positive overall perception with a few areas for potential improvement.
Overall, this university garners strong scores across most categories. Student life stands out as a particular strength, boasting the highest rating. Location also scores very well. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest marks, indicating an area for potential improvement. The university demonstrates a solid reputation for its professors, facilities, internationality, and value.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in **Value** and **Internationality**, both scoring very high. **Professors** also receive a strong rating, indicating high academic quality. **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation** are all rated solidly, suggesting a good overall student experience. The lowest-rated area, though still positive, is **Location**.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores awarded for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Value. These areas represent the university's most outstanding attributes. The accommodation rating of 3 indicates a moderate but not exceptional aspect of the student experience. Internationality also scores well at 4, suggesting a generally welcoming environment for global students.
Nothing to show
With a stellar rating of 5, student life stands out as the university's strongest asset. Conversely, facilities, professors, and accommodation all received a moderate rating of 3, indicating areas for potential improvement. Location, internationality, and value are rated positively at 4, suggesting a good overall experience for students.
Around 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting high-quality education, excellent faculty, and valuable connections. A small portion of feedback mentions issues with some professors and the grading system.
~92% of reviews are positive, praising skill development, modern labs, and qualified, involved teaching staff. Students also highlight extracurricular activities and university prestige. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.82/5 from 49 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highly praise the school's practical, results-driven business education and real-world application. Modules and assignments are frequently highlighted for their immediate applicability.
With one review, the university is highly rated at 5/5. This positive feedback highlights excellent student care and a welcoming environment. No negative reviews were received.
Nothing to show
With a 4/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with approximately 100% of reviews being favorable. Students highlight engaging programs and knowledgeable professors.
Nothing to show
'-': some equipment and manuals, that we study, are outdated. All buildings, except the main one, need to be repaired. Some teachers are incompetent in their subjects. ' ': Opportunities. A lot of opportunities. Large number of events are held at the university and if you will participate in them, you will develop yourself very much.
Nothing to show
If you’re looking for a practical, results-driven business education that makes a real impact, the Eurasian Management & Administration School (EMAS) is an excellent choice. EMAS stands out as one of the strongest business schools in Central and Eastern Europe, offering MBA, Executive MBA, DBA, and business coaching programs that focus on real-world implementation and strategic thinking. DBA at EMAS transformed my leadership and boosted my Business vision, it’s a Strategic DBA, that gives real business impact. The DBA sharpened my executive edge. In all it’s a Practical DBA, great support, real impact.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
