National Research University Higher School of Economics - HSE vs Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University - SPbPU vs Moscow School of Management SKOLKOVO vs Kazan National Research Technical University named after A.N Tupolev vs Elbrus Coding Bootcamp

Side-by-side comparison from 63 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
National Research University Higher School of Economics - HSE: wins 0/2 categories
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University - SPbPU: wins 0/2 categories
Moscow School of Management SKOLKOVO: wins 2/2 categories
Kazan National Research Technical University named after A.N Tupolev: wins 0/2 categories
Elbrus Coding Bootcamp: wins 0/2 categories
Center for Creative Leadership: wins 0/2 categories
Kazan State Medical University - KGMY: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Accounting and Management
Best programme: Aerospace Engineering
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Psychology of Human Resources Development
Best programme: General Medicine
Category ratings
Facilities
4.14
4.14
5.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
4.00
Location
4.67
4.64
5.00
5.00
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Professors
4.33
4.18
5.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Internationality
4.18
4.39
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Student life
4.10
4.85
5.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
3.00
Value
4.48
4.33
5.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Accommodation
3.99
3.66
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High academic quality & skilled faculty
  • +Global outlook & diverse programs
  • +Career opportunities & strong network
  • +Advanced labs and modern equipment
  • +Highly qualified and involved teaching staff
  • +Diverse academic and extracurricular development opportunities
  • +Engaging, relevant instruction from passionate, supportive faculty.
  • +Emphasis on analytical thinking and practical application of concepts.
  • +High-quality education and professional teachers
  • +Vibrant student life with diverse activities

Nothing to show

  • +Student-centered support and inclusivity
  • +Welcoming and understanding community
  • +Expert faculty & practical experience
  • +Abundant learning resources
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues hinder student support.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and subjective academic processes are problematic.
  • -Unrealistic exam difficulty and demanding workloads cause frustration.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective teaching methods and curriculum design are problematic.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content can be irrelevant or not up-to-date.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of engagement and relevance in course material is a common complaint.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are often described as outdated or poorly maintained.
  • -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a problem.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates a particularly strong showing in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. Value and Professors are also highly regarded. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest score among the evaluated aspects. The university also scores well in Internationality, Facilities, and Student Life, indicating a generally positive overall perception with a few areas for potential improvement.

Overall, this university garners strong scores across most categories. Student life stands out as a particular strength, boasting the highest rating. Location also scores very well. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest marks, indicating an area for potential improvement. The university demonstrates a solid reputation for its professors, facilities, internationality, and value.

This institution achieves perfect scores across all assessed areas. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a stellar 5 out of 5. This indicates an exceptionally strong and well-rounded university experience with no discernible weak points based on this rating system.

A well-rounded institution, this university achieves a perfect score in location, offering a significant advantage. While most aspects, including facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, all garnered a solid 4 out of 5, no other areas reached the same peak rating. This indicates a consistently good experience with a particular highlight on its advantageous geographic positioning.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores awarded for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Value. These areas represent the university's most outstanding attributes. The accommodation rating of 3 indicates a moderate but not exceptional aspect of the student experience. Internationality also scores well at 4, suggesting a generally welcoming environment for global students.

This institution earns top marks in key areas. Professors and location receive perfect scores, alongside excellent value. Facilities and accommodation are also strong, with internationality also rated positively. The main area for improvement, according to these ratings, is student life, which received a moderate score.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Around 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting high-quality education, excellent faculty, and valuable connections. A small portion of feedback mentions issues with some professors and the grading system.

~92% of reviews are positive, praising skill development, modern labs, and qualified, involved teaching staff. Students also highlight extracurricular activities and university prestige. No negative feedback was recorded.

With one review, the average rating is 5/5. The feedback is overwhelmingly positive, highlighting engaging coursework, interactive instructors, and supportive guidance. No negative feedback was received.

With a 4/5 average rating, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight good education quality and professional teachers, alongside enjoyable student life with many challenging activities, particularly in sports.

Nothing to show

With one review, the university is highly rated at 5/5. This positive feedback highlights excellent student care and a welcoming environment. No negative reviews were received.

With one review, the university receives a 5/5 rating. The positive feedback highlights excellent professors and valuable hospital connections. No negative reviews were submitted.

Rating distribution
5★
65%
44%
100%
0%
0%
100%
100%
4★
22%
44%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
3★
9%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Polytechnic

'-': some equipment and manuals, that we study, are outdated. All buildings, except the main one, need to be repaired. Some teachers are incompetent in their subjects. ' ': Opportunities. A lot of opportunities. Large number of events are held at the university and if you will participate in them, you will develop yourself very much.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close