University of Wroclaw - UWr vs Silesian University of Technology - SUT vs University of Lodz - UL vs Lublin University of Technology vs University of Economics and Innovation in Lublin - WSEI
Side-by-side comparison from 216 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality education and excellent professors
- +Valuable practical experience and research opportunities
- +Enjoyable student life in a beautiful city
- +Well-equipped labs and modern facilities for hands-on experience
- +Supportive and informed professors and excellent international student support
- +Engaging extracurricular activities and relevant, career-focused programs
- +High-quality education with excellent, approachable professors and a supportive atmosphere.
- +Diverse, international, and social environment with many opportunities.
- +Modern, well-equipped facilities and a positive urban setting.
- +Excellent, knowledgeable, and passionate professors.
- +High-quality academic programs and innovative courses.
- +Well-equipped facilities and supportive services.
- +Approachable and supportive lecturers and staff
- +Emphasis on practical skills and real-world application
- +Welcoming and friendly university environment
Nothing to show
- +Professors' approachability
- +Program relevance and substance
- -Outdated facilities and underfunding are a significant issue.
- -Course content is often irrelevant for students with a relevant BA.
- -Program lacks promised opportunities beyond specific career paths.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Ineffective instruction and lack of support hinder academic progress.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and lack of efficient management.
- -Outdated or poorly maintained facilities and resources.
- -Unengaging curriculum and ineffective teaching methods.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are prevalent complaints.
- -administrative & management issues
- -outdated facilities
- -lack of clear communication
Nothing to show
- -Lack of professor engagement and institutional support.
- -Uninspiring campus environment.
This university garners strong feedback across several key areas. The location stands out as the highest-rated aspect, achieving a score of 4.8. Professors also received excellent marks, with a rating of 4.45. Accommodation represents the lowest score among the surveyed categories at 4.01. Overall, student life, facilities, and internationality also received favorable ratings between 4.1 and 4.2.
Perceptions of this university show a generally positive academic environment. Location stands out as the strongest area, with student life also receiving high marks. Professors are well-regarded. Areas for potential improvement include internationality, which has the lowest rating, and accommodation. Facilities and value are rated solidly in the middle.
This institution garners strong ratings across several key areas. Location and value are particularly well-regarded, achieving scores over 4.2. Internationality and professors also score highly, exceeding 4.1. While student life and accommodation are rated positively, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories.
This institution receives commendable ratings across several key areas, with its **Location** standing out as the strongest aspect, followed closely by **Student Life** and **Accommodation**. **Facilities** and **Professors** also score well. Areas for potential improvement, where ratings are less robust, include **Internationality** and **Value**.
This university garners impressive scores in several key areas, with **Location** being its strongest asset at 4.67 and **Facilities** also highly rated at 4.57. **Student Life** and **Professors** also received positive marks. However, **Accomodation** presents a significant challenge, with a considerably lower rating of 2.83, indicating this is the weakest aspect according to the provided data. **Internationality** and **Value** fall within a solid middle range.
Nothing to show
The university's location is its most significant strength, receiving a high rating of 4.4. Internationality also scores well at 3.8. Conversely, facilities and professors present areas for improvement, both scoring 2.8. Student life, accommodation, and value are rated moderately at 3.0, indicating a generally average performance in these aspects.
With a 4.37/5 average, ~96% of reviews are positive, praising high-quality education, engaged professors, practical opportunities, and the city. A small percentage (~4%) mention disappointment with specific course content and limited opportunities in some programs.
With ~92% positive feedback from 24 reviews, students highlight excellent, well-equipped labs and helpful professors. The program effectively prepares students for technical careers and the energy industry, with strong international student support.
With a 4.13/5 average rating from 98 reviews, ~94% are positive, highlighting a high-quality education, supportive academic staff, and a social, dynamic city. No negative feedback was received.
Positive feedback (~83%) highlights knowledgeable and supportive professors, good academic programs, and well-equipped facilities. Some minor concerns exist regarding outdated equipment and syllabus improvements. No significant negative feedback was noted.
Students largely praise the university's welcoming environment and approachable, supportive lecturers, with a strong emphasis on practical application. Minor feedback suggests potential areas for improvement in sports facilities and clarification of explanations.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 3.2/5, feedback suggests a mixed student experience. While ~80% of reviews are positive, some students report professors lacking engagement and insufficient learning support, alongside easy exams.
As a current master's student in the Communication Management program at the University of Wroclaw, I can confidently say that this journey has been one of the most enriching experiences of my life, not only academically, but also personally and professionally. 1. Global opportunities through Erasmus+: During my time here, I’ve joined two short-term BIP exchange programs in Spain and Romania (with a generous grant), and have a one-year exchange in Germany. These experiences have allowed me to meet peers from across Europe, learn in diverse settings, and grow both culturally and intellectually. 2. Serious research, strong support: I’m currently representing our Institute in a Monography research project of UWr, a valuable opportunity to engage deeply with academic work and collaborate with professors in a meaningful way. The opportunity is open for all students who wanna pursue an academic path. 3. Supportive and passionate faculty: The professors are not only knowledgeable but also truly approachable. In the first semester, I approached my professor for guidance on career path, research opportunities, and expressed my interest. She shared insightful experiences, motivated and encouraged me a lot. And she nominated me for the Monography research project under her supervision, and I got the opportunity. I'm grateful, honestly. 4. Practice-oriented learning: Unlike many programs that are heavy on theory, this one focuses on real-world projects, case studies, and group work - ideal for master's-level students who want to build practical skills for the workplace. Actually, I don't face much study pressure, I enjoy the courses. 5. International Office that really cares: The International Office team is incredibly helpful. During the application process, I was surprised that they always responded to my email inquiries quickly and helped me resolve any issues. When I study here, from paperworks support to academic/exchange activities, they are always ready to assist and create a welcoming environment for students from all over the world. 6. Peaceful lifestyle & affordable living: Wroclaw is a charming, student-friendly city with a mix of history and modernity. The cost of living is reasonable, making it accessible for many international students without compromising on quality of life. I travelled to many cities in European countries, but Wroclaw is one of the most peaceful and affordable cities. Although the English skills of the city officers are limited, they always try to support by using Google Translate or finding support people. Studying at the University of Wroclaw has opened doors I never imagined: from international networks to research, from personal growth to professional clarity. If you're looking for an educational experience that truly takes you beyond the classroom, this could be your next big step. I appreciate this experience and believe that this is a worthy step to open up many opportunities to explore the world!
Studies, are at very good level, but the most important think is what university gives you apart from lectures. There are so many free courser, and student organisactions you can join. Ya'll never get bored here.
I was an international student at the University of Lodz in Poland. I am very happy that I choose this university for my masters studies. May be for some one its not but the overall discipline is appreciable.
Nothing to show
WSEI is a really friendly place to be, the staff are approachable and helpful. My unique experiences were learning about how to care for the sick in ways that I never knew existed such as making the patients feel comfortable and treating them like family since I am studying nursing. It made me feel more passionate and look forward to all my lectures.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
