Armenian State University of Economics - ASUE vs Russian-Armenian University vs National Polytechnic University of Armenia - NPUA vs International Scientific Educational Centre NAS RA - ISEC vs State Academy of Fine Arts of Armenia

Side-by-side comparison from 99 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Armenian State University of Economics - ASUE: wins 0/2 categories
Russian-Armenian University: wins 0/2 categories
National Polytechnic University of Armenia - NPUA: wins 0/2 categories
International Scientific Educational Centre NAS RA - ISEC: wins 0/2 categories
State Academy of Fine Arts of Armenia: wins 0/2 categories
Northwest International University - NWIU: wins 2/2 categories
European University of Armenia - EUA: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Finance and Financial Markets
Best programme: Economics and Business
Best programme: Agriculture
Best programme: Art History
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
3.00
4.50
5.00
3.00
5.00
4.11
Location
5.00
3.00
3.50
5.00
4.00
5.00
3.98
Professors
4.00
2.50
4.00
5.00
4.00
5.00
4.35
Internationality
4.00
3.00
4.50
4.00
3.00
5.00
Win
4.27
Student life
4.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
5.00
5.00
4.15
Value
4.00
2.50
3.50
5.00
5.00
5.00
4.31
Accommodation
1.00
3.00
3.00
4.00
3.00
5.00
Win
4.25
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Dedicated lecturers & practical, career-oriented courses
  • +Strong academic foundation in economic/financial theory
  • +Opportunities for research & university projects
  • +Excellent teaching staff and strong networking opportunities
  • +Affordable tuition and diverse program offerings
  • +Positive university environment and international cooperation
  • +Strong community and supportive professors
  • +Practical skills and advanced labs
  • +Positive city and career opportunities
  • +Research opportunities and advanced degrees
  • +Distance learning flexibility
  • +Wide range of specializations
  • +Diverse and proper educational programs across various fields
  • +Essential artistic knowledge provision
  • +Academic excellence and reputable institution
  • +International presence and global outlook
  • +Commitment to growth and development
  • +Supportive and communicative specialists/lecturers
  • +Interesting and diverse program content
  • +Professional and supportive academic environment
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as unengaging or ineffective.
  • -Unpleasant and unwelcoming staff attitude.
  • -Poor and unsafe school grounds accessibility.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and engagement.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unsupportive faculty are major drawbacks.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant concern.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt student experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and support from staff is frustrating.
  • -Strict and inflexible academic policies with a focus on punitive grading.
  • -Resistance to accommodating diverse linguistic backgrounds.
  • -Perceived unfairness and lack of student recourse in academic disputes.
Rating summary
What students say

A strong overall performance is evident, with the university excelling particularly in its **location (5)**. Ratings for facilities, professors, student life, internationality, and value are all a solid 4, indicating a generally positive experience in these areas. However, **accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, receiving a low rating of 1**. This suggests a considerable area for improvement.

Across several key aspects, this institution presents a fairly consistent picture. Its strongest areas include facilities, location, student life, accommodation, and internationality, all receiving a solid rating of 3. However, the university's professors and overall value appear to be its weakest points, with both rated at 2.5.

This institution garners significant praise for its excellent **Facilities** and impressive **Internationality**, both scoring a high 4.5. **Professors** and **Student Life** are also well-regarded at 4. The university's **Location** and **Value** are rated a respectable 3.5, while **Accommodation** is its lowest-scoring area at 3.

An overwhelmingly positive evaluation is presented, with the institution achieving perfect scores in Facilities, Professors, and Location. Student Life, Accomodation, and Internationality are also strong, each receiving a commendable rating of 4. Value for money is similarly rated as excellent. The institution's primary strengths lie in its exceptional facilities, faculty, and prime location, while areas like student engagement and housing are rated very well, indicating a consistently high standard across most aspects.

The university demonstrates a notably strong performance in **Student Life** and **Value**, both receiving perfect scores. Conversely, its **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are areas that could be improved, scoring a moderate 3. Other aspects, including **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, fall within a solid, positive range.

This institution garners perfect scores across every evaluated aspect. With a remarkable 5 out of 5 in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value, there are no discernible weak areas. The university demonstrates exceptional strength in all surveyed categories, indicating a consistently high-quality experience for its students.

Across various aspects, this institution demonstrates a solid performance. Its highest-rated categories include Value (4.29), Internationality (4.24), and Accomodation (4.24), suggesting a positive experience in these areas. Student Life also scores well at 4.12. Conversely, the weakest area identified is Location, receiving a rating of 3.98. Professors are rated highly at 4.34, followed closely by Facilities at 4.10.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4/5, reviews indicate a positive student experience, with ~67% of feedback being positive. No negative feedback was reported.

Four out of five reviews are positive, rating the university a 4/5 average. Positive feedback highlights helpful teachers and a good learning environment. One negative review criticizes the university's attitude.

With a 4.33/5 average rating from 3 reviews, students are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Recurring themes include a supportive community, impactful future creation, and good networking opportunities.

With one review and an average rating of 5/5, this university has overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students appreciate opportunities for research involvement and the flexibility of distance learning.

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, the university is praised for its wide range of study programs and thorough artistic education. No negative feedback was recorded.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, this university garners universally positive feedback. No negative comments were received, indicating ~100% satisfaction.

~98% of reviews are positive, praising supportive specialists, interesting programs, and quality teaching. A small minority (~2%) found it difficult to pass and faced language barriers.

Rating distribution
5★
33%
60%
33%
100%
0%
100%
62%
4★
33%
20%
33%
0%
100%
0%
32%
3★
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
1★
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Medium-to-high-level university in Armenia

Armenian State University of Economics has many departments like Management, Finance, Accounting and Audit, International Economic Relations, Marketing, Computer Science. I got my bachelor degree in Management in this university. By the time I studied there (2010-2014), the classes had mainly theoretical part, almost no practical, most of the professors had lack of abroad training and up-to-date knowledge. Besides, some of the courses were not relevant to the specialization at all and you had no right to refuse taking those courses. This was actually very disappointing, as I expected the classes to be more up-to-date, more career-oriented. But still, here you can get sound knowledge for all the best managerial theories and practices if you're eager to learn. In order to get your bachelor degree in this university, you need to study for 4 years, and 2 for masters. Mainly local people study here, there's almost no nationality diversity. The university has several buildings separated for different faculties. The library is not very diverse. The university has its own cafeteria and sport ground. For me, this is a medium-level university, which can give you some basic knowledge to start your evolution from :)

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Not bad

I would recommend it, but sometimes there can be moments, when classes are being cancelled or skiped. The courses are easy to understand, maybe that's subjective, but for me, it is quiet easy Pros: Friendly enviroment Skillfull professors Interesting Cons: A little bit non disciplined There can be times, when classes skips

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close