Yerevan State University - YSU vs American University of Armenia - AUA vs Armenian State University of Economics - ASUE vs Yerevan Brusov State University of Languages and Social Sciences - YSLU vs French University in Armenia - UFAR
Side-by-side comparison from 33 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Quality education and knowledgeable professors
- +Excellent opportunities and resources
- +Focus on personal development and positive experiences
- +Supportive learning environment with inspiring, diverse peers and helpful faculty.
- +High-quality, practical curriculum offering valuable real-world experience.
- +Positive campus atmosphere and central location in Yerevan.
- +Dedicated lecturers & practical, career-oriented courses
- +Strong academic foundation in economic/financial theory
- +Opportunities for research & university projects
- +High quality language education
- +Emphasis on practical application and speaking skills
- +International diploma opportunities and career preparation
- +High-quality lecturers and relevant course materials
- +Access to international study and language options
- +Research opportunities and advanced degrees
- +Distance learning flexibility
- +Wide range of specializations
- +Academic excellence and reputable institution
- +International presence and global outlook
- +Commitment to growth and development
- -Outdated teaching methods and resources are a recurring problem.
- -The examination system focuses on passing rather than actual learning.
- -The university offers little beyond what a basic course would provide.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of resources and support impacts student success.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as unengaging or ineffective.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -A lack of effective communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Outdated curriculum and teaching methods
- -Lack of practical application and real-world relevance
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant concern.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of communication and support from staff is frustrating.
This university garners excellent scores for its **Location** (5) and **Student Life** (4.5), alongside a strong showing for **Professors** (4.67) and **Value** (4.5). However, **Accomodation** (2.67) stands out as a considerably weaker area. **Facilities** (3.67) and **Internationality** (3.5) also received moderate ratings.
This university garners strong praise across multiple aspects, with its location particularly standing out at a 4.5 rating. Professors, student life, and value also received solid scores of 4.25. Facilities and accommodation were rated a respectable 4, while internationality also achieved a 4. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded offering, with its prime location being its most significant asset.
A strong overall performance is evident, with the university excelling particularly in its **location (5)**. Ratings for facilities, professors, student life, internationality, and value are all a solid 4, indicating a generally positive experience in these areas. However, **accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, receiving a low rating of 1**. This suggests a considerable area for improvement.
This institution receives its highest marks for **Location**, scoring a perfect 5. Conversely, **Accommodations** present a significant challenge, with a rating of just 1.5. Other areas like Professors and Student Life received solid scores, while Facilities, Internationality, and Value fall in the mid-range.
Presenting a consistent performance across all metrics, this university received a neutral rating of zero in every surveyed category. Notably, there are no areas of particular strength or weakness identified, suggesting an even distribution of perceived quality. This uniformity across facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value indicates a consistent, albeit unremarkable, experience for students.
An overwhelmingly positive evaluation is presented, with the institution achieving perfect scores in Facilities, Professors, and Location. Student Life, Accomodation, and Internationality are also strong, each receiving a commendable rating of 4. Value for money is similarly rated as excellent. The institution's primary strengths lie in its exceptional facilities, faculty, and prime location, while areas like student engagement and housing are rated very well, indicating a consistently high standard across most aspects.
This institution garners perfect scores across every evaluated aspect. With a remarkable 5 out of 5 in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value, there are no discernible weak areas. The university demonstrates exceptional strength in all surveyed categories, indicating a consistently high-quality experience for its students.
Most reviews are positive (~79%), highlighting good education and professors. Some suggestions include more practical internships and international exchange programs. A small portion (~14%) found teaching outdated or lacking.
With a 4.3/5 average rating from 10 reviews, ~90% are positive. Students praise the supportive environment, knowledgeable professors, and international atmosphere. Little negative feedback was noted.
With an average rating of 4/5, reviews indicate a positive student experience, with ~67% of feedback being positive. No negative feedback was reported.
With an average rating of 3.5/5, approximately 50% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent learning experiences and a potential for leading the field. No negative reviews were recorded, suggesting minimal negative feedback.
The vast majority of reviews are positive (~89%), praising the academic programs, international opportunities, and faculty. A small percentage (~11%) mention some academic limitations.
With one review and an average rating of 5/5, this university has overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students appreciate opportunities for research involvement and the flexibility of distance learning.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, this university garners universally positive feedback. No negative comments were received, indicating ~100% satisfaction.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Armenian State University of Economics has many departments like Management, Finance, Accounting and Audit, International Economic Relations, Marketing, Computer Science. I got my bachelor degree in Management in this university. By the time I studied there (2010-2014), the classes had mainly theoretical part, almost no practical, most of the professors had lack of abroad training and up-to-date knowledge. Besides, some of the courses were not relevant to the specialization at all and you had no right to refuse taking those courses. This was actually very disappointing, as I expected the classes to be more up-to-date, more career-oriented. But still, here you can get sound knowledge for all the best managerial theories and practices if you're eager to learn. In order to get your bachelor degree in this university, you need to study for 4 years, and 2 for masters. Mainly local people study here, there's almost no nationality diversity. The university has several buildings separated for different faculties. The library is not very diverse. The university has its own cafeteria and sport ground. For me, this is a medium-level university, which can give you some basic knowledge to start your evolution from :)
Like every institution Brusov State University also has its good and bad sides. My experience in the university was really memorable thanks to some of the lecturers and staff members, as well as the friends I have made there. BSU offers different fields of study, such as linguistics, public relations, journalism, tourism, international relations, European studies, political science, but its main focus is the fields of foreign languages. Wherever profession you chose for your study be sure that you will also be learning many languages, as the university teaches 28 languages, such as English, Russian, Spanish, French, German, Italian, Chinese, Korean and more. Another positive thing about the BSU that it closely works with many international university and organizations. Hence students are given many opportunities to become exchange students in other European universities or take part in training courses. As for the things that need to be changes in the university is the approach of many lectures that are mostly focused on the theories and somehow manage to make their lectures boring. Another thing that I did not like is that the classrooms are not comfortable and the equipment (notebooks, computer, projectors, etc) are old and need to be changes.
I'm a student of marketing faculty, and honestly, I am disappointed with my choice. As an advantage, I can say that you can learn additional 2-3 new languages fluently. Also, after graduating you have 2 degrees. However, I'm a sophomore and during these two years I haven't learned anything but simple principles of marketing with Kotler's book. For you to know, today all the greatest marketing specialists say that Kotler's book is too old for today's market, even Kotler himself says that the market has changed and it needs a total new strategy. What I'm trying to say is that this university does not give you proper knowledge in the marketing field. We study economics, accounting, management etc. Maybe it is a good business school, but personally, I regret entering. I read tones of books, I do different internships and go to all kind of seminars and training to have the knowledge, to get to know to skills and simply to learn what my profession is. On the other hand, in this university, you are always mentally abused. Those security guys who ALWAYS YELL at you simply because you talked to your friend during the break or because you were late for 5 minutes,some lecturers who kill the creativity and motivation in you, the Head which makes changes whenever and however they want and you can't contribute to stopping those changes, because you don't have a voice. I do think that education has a vital importance, but also I think that your health, inner peace and harmony are more important. Internet is full of books, mentors and information. My advice is, choose a university where you'll be MENTALLY STABLE and just learn to learn on your own. P.s. maybe this review is harsh, these are things which are real but unfortunately, no one talks about them. P.s.s. we don't have cafeteria, proper lecture halls, the building sucks, oh and yes, you can't celebrate the new year for 4 years as you have a bunch of exams during that time. Good luck!
Nothing to show
Nothing to show