University of East London - UEL vs Brunel University London vs University of Greenwich - UoG vs Kingston University - KU vs St George's University of London
Side-by-side comparison from 375 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and knowledgeable staff
- +Practical, industry-relevant learning
- +Friendly and diverse community
- +Practical, career-focused learning with industry relevance
- +Supportive and engaging teaching staff
- +Accessible campus and useful resources
- +Supportive and approachable faculty
- +Welcoming and vibrant campus atmosphere
- +Diverse and enriching academic programs
- +Knowledgeable and approachable lecturers, practical and relevant course content
- +Inclusive campus environment with many opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Strong support systems and useful resources for students
- +Strong healthcare focus and practical NHS experience
- +Excellent faculty support and expertise
- +Unique communication skills training and supportive community
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Poor teaching quality and irrelevant course content.
- -Lack of institutional support and inaccessible amenities.
- -Ineffective administration and patronizing senior management.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Outdated course content and confusing teaching methods are frustrating.
- -Poor communication and lack of professionalism are prevalent.
- -Poor teaching quality and insufficient lecturing staff.
- -Ineffective communication and administrative problems.
- -Disruption from strikes and feeling that tuition fees were not justified.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts studies.
- -Disorganized student union and indifferent faculty are recurring problems.
- -Administrative & management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Facilities are often outdated and in poor condition.
- -Lack of communication and unclear policies cause frustration.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates particular strengths in its Location, scoring 4.35, closely followed by Facilities at 4.30 and Internationality at 4.25. Professors also received a solid rating of 4.23. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.33, while Student Life, at 3.87, is also an area with room for improvement. Value is rated moderately well at 4.13.
This institution garners a strong overall rating, particularly excelling in **Internationality** with a score of 4.33. **Professors** and **Value** also receive high marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Location** present the weakest areas, scoring 3.61 and 3.72 respectively. Facilities, student life, and professors all fall within a commendable 3.8 to 4.0 range.
A review of university ratings indicates a strong performance in internationality, with a score of 4.56, and location, rated at 4.52. Professors also received a favorable assessment at 4.34. The facilities and student life categories scored similarly around 4.25, with value also within this range. The weakest area identified is accommodation, which received a score of 3.85.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with Internationality standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, Location, and Value also received favorable scores. Student Life and Accomodation are areas where improvements could be beneficial, as they received the lowest ratings in the survey.
Overall, the university receives positive feedback. Its strongest areas include professors and value, both scoring very high. Student life and internationality also received strong marks. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, which garnered the lowest score. Facilities and location fall in the mid-range, indicating room for improvement in these aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive tutors, practical learning, and personal growth. A small portion (~4%) of negative feedback mentions unhelpful staff or irrelevant course content.
Over 97% of reviews are positive, highlighting career-focused degrees, practical learning, and supportive lecturers. A small amount of negative feedback mentions visa issues and course content clarity.
Nearly all student feedback is positive (~98%), highlighting excellent faculty support, diverse student life, and top-notch facilities. A small portion (~2%) mentions organizational issues and lecturer inconsistency.
Kingston University receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~81% of 80 reviews being 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.19/5. Key strengths include knowledgeable lecturers, practical course content, and a supportive environment, though a small percentage (~2.5%) noted poor management and lack of resources.
With an average rating of 4.29/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students praise healthcare courses, practical experience, faculty support, and the university's location. Some minor concerns include slow administration.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The course and it's syllabus can be super interesting and fun but most of the lecturers are trash. They show no enthusiasm to teach and deliver lectures as if they were eulogies. Which is a shame, I feel the only thing holding back KU is the lack of enthusiasm.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
