Warsaw University of Technology vs SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities vs Graduate School for Social Research - GSSR vs University of Euroregional Economy - WSGE vs Collegium Humanum Warsaw Management University
Side-by-side comparison from 127 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent faculty expertise and teaching quality
- +Interesting and practical programs with industry relevance
- +Engaging learning environment and student experience
- +Dedicated and inspiring professors
- +Well-organized and relevant programs
- +Opportunities for growth and diverse experiences
- +High-quality teaching and respected professors
- +Engaging academic content and insightful thinkers
- +Well-organized courses and prepared materials
- +Affordable tuition and helpful staff
- +Supportive professors and direct student contact
- +Accessible location near Warsaw
- +High education level and experienced professors
- +Valuable new skills acquisition
- +Worthwhile academic decision
- +Strong academic programs and accreditations
- +Commitment to student development and success
- +Practical learning through internships and workshops
- +International environment and practical learning
- +Supportive faculty and experienced lecturers
- +Personal growth and networking opportunities
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are perceived as ineffective or irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues, including misleading information and poor course coordination.
- -Inconsistent and disorganized teaching, with repeated content and last-minute class cancellations.
- -Lack of proper avenues for feedback or complaint resolution.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently disliked.
- -Lack of resources, including technology and learning materials, is a significant complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and unclear communication cause frustration.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
- -Communication breakdowns and unclear expectations lead to student dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and registration errors cause significant hassle and unexpected costs.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of engaging learning environments are prevalent.
- -Inadequate student support, including limited facilities and poor communication, detracts from the experience.
- -Administrative & management issues lead to poor responsiveness and disappearing support after tuition payment.
This institution receives high marks in several key areas. Its strongest performance is in **Location**, followed closely by **Professors** and **Value**. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also rate well. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** emerge as the comparatively weaker aspects, receiving the lowest scores among the surveyed categories.
This university garners excellent scores in several key areas. Professors and facilities are particularly well-regarded, alongside a strong showing for internationality. Student life and accommodation represent the lowest-rated aspects, although these still fall within a generally positive range. Location and value also receive solid marks, indicating a well-rounded educational experience.
Across all surveyed categories, the university has received consistent ratings of zero. This indicates no discernible strengths or weaknesses in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value. The uniform scores suggest a lack of significant positive or negative attributes in any area evaluated.
Overall, this university garners strong ratings, particularly excelling in its **Professors** and **Student Life**, both achieving a high score of 4.5. The **Facilities**, **Internationality**, and **Value** also stand out with solid marks of 4.25. While **Accomodation** receives a good rating of 4, the **Location** emerges as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower at 2.75.
This institution garners excellent marks across the board. Its strongest areas, with perfect scores, are its facilities, professors, and prime location. Student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value are also highly rated, all receiving a 4.5. Overall, it presents a very appealing profile with no significant weaknesses identified.
An overall positive assessment emerges from these university ratings, with the institution excelling in **Location** (4.37) and **Internationality** (4.24). **Facilities** and **Professors** also receive high marks, both scoring approximately 4.17. The areas receiving the lowest scores are **Accomodation** (3.59), indicating room for improvement in this aspect, followed by **Student Life** and **Value**, both rated around 3.9.
The university demonstrates notable strengths in key areas. Location and value receive particularly high scores, suggesting excellent external factors and return on investment. Internationality and professors are also well-regarded. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, indicating room for improvement. Student life and facilities also score moderately, suggesting these aspects could benefit from enhancement.
With an average rating of 4.21/5 from 24 reviews, ~91% are positive. Students praise excellent faculty, engaging teaching, and positive learning environments. No negative reviews were reported.
Approximately 92.5% of reviews are positive, praising passionate lecturers, inspiring programs, and good organization. A small percentage (~7.5%) of negative feedback highlights issues with program structure and administrative concerns.
With a 4.5/5 average rating, 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent professors and high-quality content, though some note outdated management and poor funding.
With an average rating of 4.17/5 from 6 reviews, about 83% of feedback is highly positive. Students praise affordable tuition, helpful staff, direct lecturer support, and the university's positive environment. No negative feedback was provided.
Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praised the high education level, great lectures, and experienced professors.
With a 4.19/5 rating from 42 reviews, approximately 86% highlight positive aspects like university development, program quality, and organized processes. A small ~5% of feedback points to issues with administrative errors and a perceived lack of student immersion.
With an average rating of 4/5, approximately 80% of reviews are highly positive, praising the international environment, supportive faculty, and practical learning. A small amount of negative feedback (~10%) mentions administrative responsiveness issues after payment.
Well defined and well-maintained classes with highly trained professors. They are very much timely and can happily assist you and your questions during consultation 1 to 1. You can learn a great deal of Aerospace Engineering tools and get inspired by student clubs flying rockets and gliders, and racing cars.
Overall, i would rate programme at SWPS positively. What stands out the most is the practical approach to lerning. Many lectures have real professional expierience and often explain topics throhu examples from thier field, not only through theory or slides. The atmosphere is modern, open and quite relaxed, wich makes it easier to feel comfortable as a student. I also like that the university encourages independent thinking and discussion. However the organization could be better, especially considering the tuition fees. Some classes feel more useful and better prepared than others.
I have found great thinkers among both students and lecturers. I have enjoyed some courses more than I took pleasure in others, but that is solely due to my increased interest and the preference I hold for theory, especially social and cultural, whereby my greatest pleasure must have been meeting and partaking in classes held by professor Slawomir Kapralski whom I hold in highest respect. The classes are well-ordered and organized, the material is prepared and provided, the professors are attentive, kind and prompt in their correspondence - no less is the case when it comes to the correspondence one seeks in the support that the dean or the rest of the faculty staff will be willing to provide.
University is very good, coordination between students and professors is nice, work ethics is appreciable,subjects related to topic and clear whole concepts about subject and atmosphere of university is very nice.
I would definitely recommend Collegium Humanum to other students. High education level, I was able to learn a lot of new skills, professors with huge experience in the professional sector - this is why I highly rate
The art studios are equipped with the necessary tools and materials for creative expression. The school auditorium hosts various cultural events and performances, providing a platform for students to showcase their talents.
Personally, I think wwsb is one of the best private universities in Poland. It’s not just a place to study but a place to gain personal growth, networking opportunities, and the chance to contribute to research and innovation. The staffs are very friendly, teaching method is very unique and students can grasp what they’re being taught within a short period of time. Although there are no on-campus accommodations, the university helps you search for off-campus accommodation/apartment which I think is very good. The school is also situated at a very good location which makes the studying atmosphere wonderful.
