University of Warsaw - UW vs Warsaw University of Technology vs SGH Warsaw School of Economics - SGH vs Graduate School for Social Research - GSSR vs Collegium Humanum Warsaw Management University

Side-by-side comparison from 194 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Collegium Humanum Warsaw Management University (5.00)
University of Warsaw - UW: wins 0/7 categories
Warsaw University of Technology: wins 0/7 categories
SGH Warsaw School of Economics - SGH: wins 0/7 categories
Graduate School for Social Research - GSSR: wins 0/7 categories
Collegium Humanum Warsaw Management University: wins 7/7 categories
Collegium Civitas: wins 0/7 categories
Warsaw University of Business - WWSB: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: International Relations
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Law
Warsaw, Poland
4.30
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: International Relations
Best programme: IT Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.19
4.32
4.07
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
4.00
Location
4.37
4.70
4.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.71
4.30
Professors
4.46
4.35
4.30
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.21
4.10
Internationality
4.39
3.75
4.04
Not rated
4.50
Win
4.36
4.10
Student life
4.23
4.15
4.11
Not rated
4.50
Win
3.93
3.80
Value
4.46
4.35
4.15
Not rated
4.50
Win
4.00
4.30
Accommodation
4.23
3.85
3.58
Not rated
4.50
Win
3.36
3.30
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality education and knowledgeable, supportive professors
  • +Rich academic programs and engaging, career-focused curriculum
  • +Vibrant student life and attractive, affordable city location
  • +Expert and engaging faculty
  • +Relevant and practical programs
  • +Positive learning environment
  • +Inspiring academic environment and knowledgeable, supportive faculty
  • +Strong focus on practical skills and real-world application
  • +Prestigious reputation and pathway to a successful career
  • +High-quality teaching and respected professors
  • +Engaging academic content and insightful thinkers
  • +Well-organized courses and prepared materials
  • +High education level and experienced professors
  • +Valuable new skills acquisition
  • +Worthwhile academic decision
  • +International environment and diverse student body
  • +Supportive staff and dedicated professors
  • +Small class sizes and engaging learning opportunities
  • +International environment and practical learning
  • +Supportive faculty and experienced lecturers
  • +Personal growth and networking opportunities
Cons
  • -Underdeveloped curriculum with irrelevant and unhelpful courses.
  • -Limited course offerings and poor access to information.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Inflexible and irrelevant curriculum fails to engage students.
  • -Bureaucracy and administrative issues
  • -Lack of support and usability from online systems
  • -Overbearing control over student organizations
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently disliked.
  • -Lack of resources, including technology and learning materials, is a significant complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
  • -Communication breakdowns and unclear expectations lead to student dissatisfaction.
  • -Lack of communication and disregard for student concerns on crucial issues.
  • -Disappointing student experience and unfulfilled expectations.
  • -Administrative & management issues lead to poor responsiveness and disappearing support after tuition payment.
Rating summary
What students say

Academic and student experience metrics reveal a strong overall performance for the institution. Professors and value stand out as the highest-rated aspects, both scoring 4.46. Location and internationality also received very favorable scores. Facilities represent the area with the lowest rating, though still positive at 4.19. Student life and accommodation are rated similarly and comfortably above average.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its Location, receiving an excellent score of 4.7. Professors and Value also stand out with high ratings of 4.35. On the other hand, Accomodation and Internationality are areas that received lower scores, at 3.85 and 3.75 respectively, indicating potential for improvement in these aspects.

This university demonstrates a strong presence in key areas, with **Location** receiving the highest marks at 4.67. **Professors** and **Value** also perform well, scoring above 4.1. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, rated at 3.58. Other categories like Facilities, Student Life, and Internationality all fall within a comparable, solid range, generally above 4.0.

Across all surveyed categories, the university has received consistent ratings of zero. This indicates no discernible strengths or weaknesses in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value. The uniform scores suggest a lack of significant positive or negative attributes in any area evaluated.

This institution garners excellent marks across the board. Its strongest areas, with perfect scores, are its facilities, professors, and prime location. Student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value are also highly rated, all receiving a 4.5. Overall, it presents a very appealing profile with no significant weaknesses identified.

This university receives strong marks, particularly for its **location** (4.7) and **internationality** (4.3). Areas like **facilities** and **value** also score well at 4.0. The **student life** rating is solid at 3.9. The **accommodation** category presents the weakest performance with a 3.3 rating, suggesting room for improvement in student housing.

The university demonstrates notable strengths in key areas. Location and value receive particularly high scores, suggesting excellent external factors and return on investment. Internationality and professors are also well-regarded. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, indicating room for improvement. Student life and facilities also score moderately, suggesting these aspects could benefit from enhancement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University of Warsaw receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~99.1%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise strong academics, supportive professors, and vibrant campus life. A single review mentioned an underdeveloped course with irrelevant material.

With ~86% positive reviews and an average rating of 4.19/5, students highlight enjoyable experiences, strong programs, and dedicated faculty. No negative feedback was recorded.

Around 96% of reviews are positive, praising the inspiring community, academic rigor, and dedicated faculty. A small percentage of feedback (around 4%) mentions issues with bureaucracy and administrative processes.

With a 4.5/5 average rating, 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent professors and high-quality content, though some note outdated management and poor funding.

Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praised the high education level, great lectures, and experienced professors.

University reviews are largely positive (approximately 93%), with students appreciating the international environment and supportive staff. A small portion (~7%) expressed dissatisfaction regarding a canceled graduation ceremony.

With an average rating of 4/5, approximately 80% of reviews are highly positive, praising the international environment, supportive faculty, and practical learning. A small amount of negative feedback (~10%) mentions administrative responsiveness issues after payment.

Rating distribution
5★
45%
33%
41%
50%
100%
57%
40%
4★
44%
52%
52%
50%
0%
29%
40%
3★
10%
14%
4%
0%
0%
7%
10%
2★
1%
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
7%
10%
Most useful review
Most liked
Wonderful curriculum

Complex concepts are easier for students to understand when presented in a well-organized succession. The curriculum at the institution creates an ideal learning atmosphere by skillfully fusing theory and real-world application. Using a variety of teaching approaches guarantees student involvement and accommodates different learning preferences. Furthermore, the curriculum places a strong emphasis on connection to the actual world, giving students hands-on experience. All things considered, the programme has been carefully designed to make learning more seamless for students and improve their understanding and utilisation of the material.

Aerospace Engineering Bachelor's

Well defined and well-maintained classes with highly trained professors. They are very much timely and can happily assist you and your questions during consultation 1 to 1. You can learn a great deal of Aerospace Engineering tools and get inspired by student clubs flying rockets and gliders, and racing cars.

Quality Education and campus life

Attending the Warsaw School of Economics has been an enriching journey. The academic standard is impressive, offering a variety of programs that balance solid theoretical knowledge with practical skills. Professors are highly qualified and foster engaging discussions that stimulate intellectual growth. The curriculum is current, reflecting global trends and addressing real-world issues. Accommodation options are diverse, with university dorms offering affordable yet basic living conditions, though they can be competitive to secure. Private rentals are also available, though they tend to be pricier, particularly close to the center of Warsaw. As a Polish student, the tuition fees are quite reasonable in comparison to other European institutions, making SGH an excellent investment in my education. Campus life is dynamic, with numerous student clubs, events, and opportunities to connect with others. The university cultivates a strong community spirit, and there’s always something going on whether academic, social, or cultural. All in all, SGH provides a well-rounded and fulfilling university experience.

Very good

I have found great thinkers among both students and lecturers. I have enjoyed some courses more than I took pleasure in others, but that is solely due to my increased interest and the preference I hold for theory, especially social and cultural, whereby my greatest pleasure must have been meeting and partaking in classes held by professor Slawomir Kapralski whom I hold in highest respect. The classes are well-ordered and organized, the material is prepared and provided, the professors are attentive, kind and prompt in their correspondence - no less is the case when it comes to the correspondence one seeks in the support that the dean or the rest of the faculty staff will be willing to provide.

I am glad to study here

I would definitely recommend Collegium Humanum to other students. High education level, I was able to learn a lot of new skills, professors with huge experience in the professional sector - this is why I highly rate

Nothing to show

Review

Personally, I think wwsb is one of the best private universities in Poland. It’s not just a place to study but a place to gain personal growth, networking opportunities, and the chance to contribute to research and innovation. The staffs are very friendly, teaching method is very unique and students can grasp what they’re being taught within a short period of time. Although there are no on-campus accommodations, the university helps you search for off-campus accommodation/apartment which I think is very good. The school is also situated at a very good location which makes the studying atmosphere wonderful.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close