University of Warsaw - UW vs Warsaw University of Technology vs SGH Warsaw School of Economics - SGH vs SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities vs Graduate School for Social Research - GSSR
Side-by-side comparison from 221 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality, engaging academic programs with career preparation
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors fostering personal and academic growth
- +Vibrant student life and attractive campus/location
- +Excellent faculty expertise and teaching quality
- +Interesting and practical programs with industry relevance
- +Engaging learning environment and student experience
- +Strong reputation and career opportunities
- +Inspiring community and passionate lecturers
- +Solid foundation in economics and useful resources
- +Dedicated and inspiring professors
- +Well-organized and relevant programs
- +Opportunities for growth and diverse experiences
- +High-quality teaching and respected professors
- +Engaging academic content and insightful thinkers
- +Well-organized courses and prepared materials
- +Affordable tuition and helpful staff
- +Supportive professors and direct student contact
- +Accessible location near Warsaw
Nothing to show
- -Useless and irrelevant coursework and lack of accessible information.
- -Underdeveloped course structure with insufficient classes.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are perceived as ineffective or irrelevant.
- -Bureaucracy and administrative issues cause significant difficulties.
- -Online administrative services are problematic and unhelpful.
- -Excessive control over student organizations is a major concern.
- -Administrative and management issues, including misleading information and poor course coordination.
- -Inconsistent and disorganized teaching, with repeated content and last-minute class cancellations.
- -Lack of proper avenues for feedback or complaint resolution.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently disliked.
- -Lack of resources, including technology and learning materials, is a significant complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and unclear communication cause frustration.
Nothing to show
This institution receives notably high marks across most aspects. Its strongest area is **Value**, closely followed by **Professors**, indicating excellent academic and financial returns. **Location** and **Internationality** also score very well. The weakest, though still respectable, category is **Facilities**. Overall, the university presents a strong offering with notable strengths in academic and financial aspects, with room for improvement primarily in its physical infrastructure.
This institution receives high marks in several key areas. Its strongest performance is in **Location**, followed closely by **Professors** and **Value**. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also rate well. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** emerge as the comparatively weaker aspects, receiving the lowest scores among the surveyed categories.
This university garners positive feedback across most areas, with **Location** being the standout strength at 4.67. **Professors** (4.23) and **Value** (4.17) also received high marks. The **Accomodation** rating, however, stands out as the weakest point at 3.64, suggesting room for improvement in this category. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Internationality are generally well-regarded.
This university garners excellent scores in several key areas. Professors and facilities are particularly well-regarded, alongside a strong showing for internationality. Student life and accommodation represent the lowest-rated aspects, although these still fall within a generally positive range. Location and value also receive solid marks, indicating a well-rounded educational experience.
Across all surveyed categories, the university has received consistent ratings of zero. This indicates no discernible strengths or weaknesses in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value. The uniform scores suggest a lack of significant positive or negative attributes in any area evaluated.
Overall, this university garners strong ratings, particularly excelling in its **Professors** and **Student Life**, both achieving a high score of 4.5. The **Facilities**, **Internationality**, and **Value** also stand out with solid marks of 4.25. While **Accomodation** receives a good rating of 4, the **Location** emerges as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower at 2.75.
Nothing to show
Nearly all ~99% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic programs, excellent professors, and a vibrant student life. A single negative review cited underdeveloped courses and difficulty accessing information.
With an average rating of 4.21/5 from 24 reviews, ~91% are positive. Students praise excellent faculty, engaging teaching, and positive learning environments. No negative reviews were reported.
~97% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong teaching, a good reputation, and career opportunities. A small ~3% of feedback mentions bureaucracy and less useful online resources.
Approximately 92.5% of reviews are positive, praising passionate lecturers, inspiring programs, and good organization. A small percentage (~7.5%) of negative feedback highlights issues with program structure and administrative concerns.
With a 4.5/5 average rating, 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent professors and high-quality content, though some note outdated management and poor funding.
With an average rating of 4.17/5 from 6 reviews, about 83% of feedback is highly positive. Students praise affordable tuition, helpful staff, direct lecturer support, and the university's positive environment. No negative feedback was provided.
Nothing to show
Complex concepts are easier for students to understand when presented in a well-organized succession. The curriculum at the institution creates an ideal learning atmosphere by skillfully fusing theory and real-world application. Using a variety of teaching approaches guarantees student involvement and accommodates different learning preferences. Furthermore, the curriculum places a strong emphasis on connection to the actual world, giving students hands-on experience. All things considered, the programme has been carefully designed to make learning more seamless for students and improve their understanding and utilisation of the material.
Well defined and well-maintained classes with highly trained professors. They are very much timely and can happily assist you and your questions during consultation 1 to 1. You can learn a great deal of Aerospace Engineering tools and get inspired by student clubs flying rockets and gliders, and racing cars.
Attending the Warsaw School of Economics has been an enriching journey. The academic standard is impressive, offering a variety of programs that balance solid theoretical knowledge with practical skills. Professors are highly qualified and foster engaging discussions that stimulate intellectual growth. The curriculum is current, reflecting global trends and addressing real-world issues. Accommodation options are diverse, with university dorms offering affordable yet basic living conditions, though they can be competitive to secure. Private rentals are also available, though they tend to be pricier, particularly close to the center of Warsaw. As a Polish student, the tuition fees are quite reasonable in comparison to other European institutions, making SGH an excellent investment in my education. Campus life is dynamic, with numerous student clubs, events, and opportunities to connect with others. The university cultivates a strong community spirit, and there’s always something going on whether academic, social, or cultural. All in all, SGH provides a well-rounded and fulfilling university experience.
Overall, i would rate programme at SWPS positively. What stands out the most is the practical approach to lerning. Many lectures have real professional expierience and often explain topics throhu examples from thier field, not only through theory or slides. The atmosphere is modern, open and quite relaxed, wich makes it easier to feel comfortable as a student. I also like that the university encourages independent thinking and discussion. However the organization could be better, especially considering the tuition fees. Some classes feel more useful and better prepared than others.
I have found great thinkers among both students and lecturers. I have enjoyed some courses more than I took pleasure in others, but that is solely due to my increased interest and the preference I hold for theory, especially social and cultural, whereby my greatest pleasure must have been meeting and partaking in classes held by professor Slawomir Kapralski whom I hold in highest respect. The classes are well-ordered and organized, the material is prepared and provided, the professors are attentive, kind and prompt in their correspondence - no less is the case when it comes to the correspondence one seeks in the support that the dean or the rest of the faculty staff will be willing to provide.
University is very good, coordination between students and professors is nice, work ethics is appreciable,subjects related to topic and clear whole concepts about subject and atmosphere of university is very nice.
Nothing to show
