Cracow University of Economics - CUE vs University of Wroclaw - UWr vs Gdansk University of Technology vs University of Lodz - UL vs Medical University of Lodz - UMED
Side-by-side comparison from 246 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and engaging academic culture
- +Knowledgeable and accessible instructors
- +Opportunities for socializing and meeting others
- +Helpful and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Enriching academic and personal development opportunities
- +Great student city atmosphere and global opportunities
- +Strong academic programs and practical learning opportunities.
- +Positive campus environment and excellent location.
- +High university reputation and career prospects.
- +High-quality education and excellent, approachable professors.
- +Friendly, multicultural atmosphere and enjoyable student life.
- +Modern, well-equipped facilities and conducive study environment.
- +Strong theoretical foundations and well-prepared medical courses
- +Good communication and supportive teachers with small group learning
- +Opportunities for extracurricular activities and an English-language program
- +Passionate and supportive professors
- +Diverse student activities and communities
- +Relevant and practical programs
- +Helpful, knowledgeable professors and opportunities for professional development.
- +Creative, flexible courses and space for self-expression.
- +Modern campus with collaborative study spaces.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content and teaching methods are considered uninspiring or irrelevant.
- -Outdated facilities and underfunding are evident.
- -Course content and program structure are not suitable for all students.
- -Limited career opportunities beyond specific fields are a concern.
- -Outdated courses and poor teaching quality from unprepared or arrogant instructors.
- -Administrative and management issues create a frustrating experience for students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of engaging or up-to-date curriculum is a recurring concern.
- -Outdated study programs and irrelevant content.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate equipment are a concern.
- -Lack of effective teaching and support for student tasks is frustrating.
- -Poor communication and late information dissemination.
- -Unsatisfactory program quality and perceived lack of learning.
This institution demonstrates a commendable overall performance, with student life and facilities emerging as its strongest areas, both scoring above 4.4. Internationality and professors also receive solid marks. Accommodations, however, present a relative weakness with a rating of 3.83, suggesting this is an area for potential improvement. The university also fares well in location and value.
This university performs exceptionally well in **Location**, earning a top rating. **Professors** and **Value** also stand out with strong scores. Conversely, **Accomodation** is the lowest-rated aspect, though still a respectable score. Other areas like Facilities, Student Life, and Internationality fall within a generally positive range.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **location**, which received the highest rating. Student life and accommodation also scored well, reflecting positive campus experiences. While facilities and professors earned solid marks, these areas represent the relatively weaker aspects of the university's performance, though still within a generally favorable range. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded profile with notable advantages.
Overall, the university garners strong ratings, with its **location** and **value** being particularly well-regarded. The **professors** and **internationality** also received high marks. The **student life** achieved a solid rating, while **facilities** and **accommodation** were the areas with the lowest, though still respectable, scores.
This institution garners strong reviews, particularly excelling in **Internationality** with a score of 4.67, and **Student Life** at 4.5. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value are consistently high, all around 4.33. The lowest rated aspect, though still solid, is **Location** at 4.0. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded and positively regarded experience for its students.
Performance at this institution is strongest in Location and Student Life, both receiving a high rating of 4.625. Facilities and Internationality are also well-regarded, scoring 4.25 and 4.125 respectively, with Value also at 4.125. The areas with the lowest scores are Accomodation (3.75) and Professors (3.875), indicating potential for improvement in these aspects.
This institution demonstrates particular strengths in its internationality, scoring a high 4.17. Location also received a solid 4. Areas for improvement are accommodation, with the lowest rating of 2.6, and facilities and value, both scoring 3.33. Professors and student life are rated moderately well, at 3.83 and 3.5 respectively.
With a 4.29/5 average rating from 49 reviews, ~98% are positive, highlighting supportive staff and engaging academic environments. A small amount of negative feedback exists.
With ~83% of 67 reviews being positive, students praise helpful lecturers, great atmosphere, and academic/personal growth opportunities. A small ~4.5% of negative feedback mentions disappointing course relevance and limited opportunities.
Most (over 70%) reviews are positive, praising the program design, campus environment, and career prospects. A small percentage of feedback (under 8%) mentions outdated courses and some teaching quality issues.
With ~97% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.13/5, reviews highlight a high-quality education, excellent professors, and a supportive, friendly atmosphere. Students also appreciate the modern, well-equipped facilities and the vibrant city life.
With ~83% positive sentiment (4-5 stars), reviewers highlight good teaching, communication, and opportunities for learning and student life. A small portion (~17%) found the study program outdated and some material unhelpful.
With an average rating of 4.25/5, ~74% of reviews are positive, praising qualified and passionate professors, ample student activities, and a supportive environment. A small portion (~12.5%) of feedback mentions issues with classroom equipment and teaching quality.
Most reviews (~74%) are positive, highlighting helpful professors and professional development opportunities. Some feedback (~17%) notes difficulties with communication and administrative processes.
Nothing to show
As a current master's student in the Communication Management program at the University of Wroclaw, I can confidently say that this journey has been one of the most enriching experiences of my life, not only academically, but also personally and professionally. 1. Global opportunities through Erasmus+: During my time here, I’ve joined two short-term BIP exchange programs in Spain and Romania (with a generous grant), and have a one-year exchange in Germany. These experiences have allowed me to meet peers from across Europe, learn in diverse settings, and grow both culturally and intellectually. 2. Serious research, strong support: I’m currently representing our Institute in a Monography research project of UWr, a valuable opportunity to engage deeply with academic work and collaborate with professors in a meaningful way. The opportunity is open for all students who wanna pursue an academic path. 3. Supportive and passionate faculty: The professors are not only knowledgeable but also truly approachable. In the first semester, I approached my professor for guidance on career path, research opportunities, and expressed my interest. She shared insightful experiences, motivated and encouraged me a lot. And she nominated me for the Monography research project under her supervision, and I got the opportunity. I'm grateful, honestly. 4. Practice-oriented learning: Unlike many programs that are heavy on theory, this one focuses on real-world projects, case studies, and group work - ideal for master's-level students who want to build practical skills for the workplace. Actually, I don't face much study pressure, I enjoy the courses. 5. International Office that really cares: The International Office team is incredibly helpful. During the application process, I was surprised that they always responded to my email inquiries quickly and helped me resolve any issues. When I study here, from paperworks support to academic/exchange activities, they are always ready to assist and create a welcoming environment for students from all over the world. 6. Peaceful lifestyle & affordable living: Wroclaw is a charming, student-friendly city with a mix of history and modernity. The cost of living is reasonable, making it accessible for many international students without compromising on quality of life. I travelled to many cities in European countries, but Wroclaw is one of the most peaceful and affordable cities. Although the English skills of the city officers are limited, they always try to support by using Google Translate or finding support people. Studying at the University of Wroclaw has opened doors I never imagined: from international networks to research, from personal growth to professional clarity. If you're looking for an educational experience that truly takes you beyond the classroom, this could be your next big step. I appreciate this experience and believe that this is a worthy step to open up many opportunities to explore the world!
After 2 academic years at GUT, I can say with confidence that I have really enjoyed my time in here! Starting from classes/lectures and integration events to the location of the University, I have been satisfied mostly about everything. I could see that GUT had a very high reputation in terms of labor market for businesses, where representatives of companies and big corporations come to look for new candidates for their organizations by organising job fairs, lectures etc. For example, I had a chance to take part in such a lecture arranged by State Street Bank representatives and passed tests organised later on. As a result, several students and I were granted a summer internship, after which most of us including me continued working there. So, in terms of finding a job while still being a student GUT is highly recommended as most of the professors are flexible when it comes to attendance. Additionally, you can easily integrate by joining Erasmus ;) they always have something planned like party, meetings, games, trips etc. I have met many interesting people/brains/personalities/characters and made many friends. So, I have no regrets at all choosing GUT as a university for my Master's degree! I would make the same choice if I had to choose again ;)
I was an international student at the University of Lodz in Poland. I am very happy that I choose this university for my masters studies. May be for some one its not but the overall discipline is appreciable.
Nothing to show
What I like about my university and faculty is that I have a lot of possibilities to work on my development. I will meet here a lot of people from different countries and develop my social and soft skills, which are very important, for example in our future job. I cannot say a lot about my faculty yet, because I am here only for a few weeks, but I have very high hopes that it will be a well-spent time!
Nothing to show
