The Chinese University of Hong Kong - CUHK vs School of Professional and Continuing Education - HKU Space vs City University of Hong Kong - CityU vs Lingnan University - LU vs Hong Kong Shue Yan University - SYU
Side-by-side comparison from 42 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse student body and global perspectives.
- +Strong academic programs and practical skill development.
- +Supportive professors and excellent campus facilities.
- +Practical, experienced lecturers with industry networks
- +Valuable networking opportunities through facilitators and peers
- +Abundant free events and resources
- +Strong program depth and regional focus
- +Experienced and helpful faculty mentorship
- +Practical skills and real-world experience opportunities
- +Small university size, fostering close student-teacher relationships and a friendly learning environment.
- +Abundant opportunities for personal growth through experiential learning programs like service-learning and internships.
- +Supportive faculty and relevant coursework, particularly for understanding Hong Kong issues.
- +Supportive and guiding teachers.
- +Strong professor support and global opportunities
- +Pathway for aspiring teachers in Asian regions
Nothing to show
- -Poorly maintained and insufficient facilities.
- -Ineffective administrative and management decisions.
- -Lack of student representation in key decision-making processes.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of support are significant problems.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and feedback is a consistent problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are consistently described as outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content and teaching methods lack relevance and engagement.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is prevalent.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and unclear communication.
- -Lack of support and resources for students.
Nothing to show
An analysis of university ratings reveals strengths in academics and international appeal, with Professors and Value both scoring a high 4.3, and Internationality at 4. The university also received a solid 4 for Location. Student Life and Facilities are rated well, though slightly lower at 3.8 and 3.9 respectively. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, with a rating of 3.56.
Across all surveyed categories, this institution received a uniform rating of zero. This indicates no areas of particular strength or weakness were identified in the assessment of its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or overall value. The consistent score suggests a uniform lack of positive attributes or a complete absence of data in each evaluated aspect.
With outstanding marks in **Professors, Location, and Value (all 5/5)**, this institution excels in key areas. Student life and accommodation also receive very high scores (4.8/5). Facilities are rated well at 4/5, while Internationality stands out as the relatively weakest area, though still strong at 4.2/5.
An examination of the university's ratings reveals a consistent lack of scoring across all evaluated aspects. There are no standout strengths or notable weaknesses as every category, including Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value, has received a score of zero. This indicates a uniform absence of positive evaluation in all surveyed areas.
This institution garners exceptional scores in key areas like facilities, professors, student life, and internationality, all receiving a perfect 5. Location and accommodation are solid with a rating of 4, suggesting good but not outstanding offerings. Value for money is also rated at 4. The university's weakest area, relative to its strengths, is its location and accommodation, though still strong overall.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Facilities, Professors, Location, and Value**, all receiving a solid 4 out of 5. These areas suggest a well-equipped campus, quality instruction, a desirable setting, and good return on investment. Conversely, **Student Life, Accommodation, and Internationality** are rated slightly lower at 3, indicating there may be room for improvement in these aspects of the university experience.
Nothing to show
About ~74% of reviews are positive, praising strong academics, interdisciplinary learning, and extensive campus facilities. A small ~8.3% of feedback mentions issues with WiFi, limited laundry facilities, and student representation in university appointments.
The single review is positive (100%), with an average rating of 4/5 stars. This feedback highlights an experienced lecturer with practical knowledge and networking opportunities, as well as helpful volunteer facilitators.
All ten reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise the university's strong programs, experienced faculty, and practical learning opportunities like internships and exchange programs.
All feedback is positive, averaging 4.4/5 stars. Students praise the small campus size, supportive faculty, and numerous personal growth opportunities like service-learning programs.
With a single review, this university has a perfect 5/5 rating. The student expressed strong excitement and appreciation for their favorite teachers and the university. No negative feedback was received.
This university has a 4/5 average rating, with 100% of feedback being positive. Reviews highlight responsible and knowledgeable professors, as well as good global connections offering exchange and internship opportunities.
Nothing to show
I don't know if it's because I major in Computer Science, but most of the professors who are in charge of the major courses teach very well. They have detailed explanations with step-by-step examples that are easy to learn. The student body is mostly locals and mainlanders but you can definitely find your own niche with international students as well and make friends from India, Indonesia, and Korea. I lived in CWChu College. They had three washing machines and four driers with a balcony where you could dry your clothes below the sun. The machines are usually free if its not near the weekends. The college is quite isolated but I'd say its facilities is one of the best. The food around university is mediocre, but you could eat out once a week and you should be fine. The food won't fit you if you have high standards. The campus is also the best in Hong Kong and the most university-like in terms of scale. The campus is closely intertwined with nature and you can definitely see and feel the greenness well. The buildings are quite old but they serve their purpose. In my opinion, CUHK is a decent university with great professors and students.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I've completed a Bachelor and a Master degree there. The uni is small (the smallest in HK), and to me it was just perfect, e.g. low student-to-faculty ratio, 100% on-campus housing, good food from the Chinese restaurant on campus. All academic building are within short walking distance, and you can reach a supermarket, post office and convenient store within a 10-minute walk. International students may find dorm life a bit challenging because only induction cooktops and microwaves are available and no cooking with fire is allowed in all student dorms.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
