Sofia university ST. Kliment Ohridski vs EIGSI la Rochelle Engineering School vs Faculty of Economics, University of Tirana - FEUT vs Royal Conservatoire of Scotland - RCS vs Federal Polytechnic Nekede - FPNO

Side-by-side comparison from 77 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Federal Polytechnic Nekede - FPNO (4.30)
Sofia university ST. Kliment Ohridski: wins 1/7 categories
EIGSI la Rochelle Engineering School: wins 0/7 categories
Faculty of Economics, University of Tirana - FEUT: wins 0/7 categories
Royal Conservatoire of Scotland - RCS: wins 0/7 categories
Federal Polytechnic Nekede - FPNO: wins 6/7 categories
The Eugeniusz Geppert Academy of Art and Design in Wroclaw - ASP WRO: wins 0/7 categories
King George's Medical University - AVA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: European Studies
Best programme: Business Administration
Glasgow, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Banking and Finance
Category ratings
Facilities
2.96
Not rated
2.28
Not rated
3.90
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.17
Win
Not rated
3.76
Not rated
3.95
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.83
Not rated
3.36
Not rated
3.95
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
2.88
Not rated
2.32
Not rated
3.55
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.58
Not rated
2.36
Not rated
4.18
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.58
Not rated
3.08
Not rated
4.36
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
2.63
Not rated
2.20
Not rated
3.62
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Quality education and academic programs
  • +Supportive professors and staff
  • +Active student life and professional development opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent academic programs and preparation for future careers.
  • +Qualified and approachable faculty.
  • +Good campus facilities and international opportunities.

Nothing to show

  • +Passionate, knowledgeable, and helpful lecturers
  • +Conducive learning environment and practical-based courses
  • +Effective teaching methods and dedicated faculty

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and workload management.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern educational tools.
  • -Inconsistent professor quality and experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor infrastructure.
  • -Lack of practical application and career support.
  • -Administrative and communication issues.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep detract from the learning environment.
  • -Lack of support for student well-being and mental health is a major concern.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution performs notably well in Location, receiving its highest score. Student Life and Value are also areas of strength, both rated at 3.58. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area with a score of 2.63. Facilities and Internationality also received lower ratings, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects.

Nothing to show

When examining the university's performance across various categories, location stands out as the strongest area, receiving a high rating. Conversely, accommodation emerges as the weakest point, with the lowest score among the surveyed aspects. Other notable areas include professors and value, which received moderate ratings, while facilities, student life, and internationality scored lower.

Nothing to show

This university garners a strong score in Student Life, reaching 4.18, and an even higher mark for Value at 4.36, indicating excellent perceived return on investment. Conversely, Accomodation, rated at 3.62, and Internationality, at 3.55, represent the areas with the lowest scores among the surveyed categories. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, and Location fall within a similar, moderately positive range.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting quality education and student life. A small portion (~10%) of negative feedback mentions issues with pandemic handling and outdated facilities.

Nothing to show

Roughly 32% of reviews are negative. Positive feedback highlights prepared professors and good programs, while negative comments cite poor facilities, outdated materials, and lack of practical application.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.32/5, ~95% of reviews are positive. Students highly recommend the university for its passionate and knowledgeable lecturers, conducive learning environment, and practical-based courses. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
33%
0%
4%
0%
36%
0%
0%
4★
30%
0%
32%
0%
59%
0%
0%
3★
27%
0%
32%
0%
5%
0%
0%
2★
3%
0%
16%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
7%
0%
16%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
It can be good and bad, but you can learn a lot from everything

The experience you can get as a student in Sofia University mainly depends on the major and Faculty that you are in. Also, on your motivation and how much do you want to invest in time and efforts to learn something. You can have the positive experience of being taught by very good and quality professors and assistant professors, or some that are not quite good at all, but this is something you can see and experience in any university what so ever. The bureaucracy is annoying for sure.

Nothing to show

Concerning FEUT

It has a lot of place for improvement in every aspect. It needs to work on it's facilities and schedules. It desperately needs to fix the heat system and all the classrooms. It lacks a lot when it comes to putting in practise what you been studying and should help it's students when it comes to finding an internship.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close