Vilnius University vs Mykolas Romeris University - MRU vs ISM University of Management and Economics vs SMK College of Applied Sciences - SMK vs Kazimieras Simonavicius University
Side-by-side comparison from 258 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent learning system and accessible study materials
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty and coordinators
- +Strong academic programs with practical training opportunities
- +Welcoming international environment and diverse student body
- +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
- +Practical, skill-focused learning opportunities
- +Passionate faculty with international, practical experience
- +Strong balance of theory and real-world application
- +Valuable opportunities and networking
- +Practical, real-world focused learning with supportive, knowledgeable lecturers
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth through projects and events
- +Modern facilities and a strong sense of community and friendship
- +Expert and recognized faculty
- +Relevant and modern curriculum
- +Practical business applications
- +Supportive faculty and practical, relevant curriculum
- +Smooth, organized admissions and international student support
- +Modern, English-taught programs focused on practical skills
- +Practical, engaging, and theory-based programs
- +Supportive and professional lecturers
- +Friendly and student-focused environment
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Lack of support and guidance from faculty is a recurring concern.
- -Lack of adequate support and guidance from professors
- -Unrealistic and overwhelming initial course expectations
- -Poor quality of facilities, particularly dormitories
- -Administrative and management issues are a constant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of communication and support from faculty and staff is prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Limited course offerings and a small campus environment are unappealing.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Students are unhappy with outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Students find the curriculum to be unengaging and irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are consistent complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities detract from the learning environment.
- -Lack of resources, from technology to academic support, is a major drawback.
This institution receives exceptional ratings in several key areas, particularly excelling in **Value** (4.60) and **Professors** (4.58). Student life, location, and internationality also score highly. However, **Accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, receiving a significantly lower rating. Overall, the university demonstrates a strong academic and social environment, with room for improvement in its housing provisions.
This institution excels in student life and internationality, both scoring a high 4.45. Location also received a strong rating of 4.42. Accommodation is the lowest-rated area at 4.07, though other aspects like facilities, professors, and value remain solidly above 4.0.
With exceptionally high marks in several key areas, this institution excels in its **Facilities** (4.83) and **Location** (4.85). **Student Life** (4.76) and **Value** (4.73) also received very positive feedback. **Professors** (4.57) and **Internationality** (4.41) are rated well, though not quite as strongly. The **Accomodation** score (3.31) stands out as the weakest area in the assessment.
This university garners high marks in several key areas, most notably its **Location**, which received the highest rating. **Facilities** and **Internationality** also scored very well. **Student Life** and **Value** received solid scores, while **Professors** were also rated favorably. The university's **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects.
This institution demonstrates a solid performance with notable strengths in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving a strong 4-star rating. The university offers a more average experience in **Facilities**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation**, each scoring 3 stars. The overall **Value** is rated at a respectable 3.5 stars, suggesting a good return for students.
This institution receives high marks for its academic offerings, with Professors earning a strong 4.33. Facilities are also well-regarded, scoring a 4. However, areas for potential improvement include Accomodation and Value, both receiving a 3.5 rating. Student Life presents a mixed picture, rated at 3.67, while Location and Internationality fall in the mid-range with 3.83.
This institution receives excellent marks in key areas, notably achieving a perfect score for Accommodation and near-perfect ratings for Professors and Student Life. Facilities also score very well. The weakest area identified is Location, with a rating significantly lower than other aspects. Internationality and Value are also strong points.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~93% of students rating it 4–5 stars. Praised aspects include learning systems, humble and helpful teachers, and an international environment. Minimal negative feedback exists.
With a 4.39 average rating from 28 reviews, ~96% are positive, highlighting a welcoming international environment, supportive professors, and practical learning. A small ~4% of feedback mentioned some programs needing improvement for challenging, research-focused study.
With an average rating of 4.73/5 from 37 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students praise the balance of theory and practice, passionate faculty with international experience, and the overall enriching educational experience.
Approximately 96.5% of reviews are positive, praising approachable lecturers, practical, real-world skills, and growth opportunities. One review expressed negative sentiment.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, university students report positive experiences, highlighting professional and knowledgeable lecturers. The curriculum is noted as modern, relevant, and offering practical business applications. No negative feedback was received.
With an average rating of 4/5, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight a good learning environment, quality of education with practical studies, and helpful international admission support.
All 5 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.8/5. Students praise the practical and interesting classes, supportive teachers, and friendly environment. No negative feedback was received.
This is one of the best universities in Lithuania right now. After taking admission here, I joined the classes and the learning system impressed me greatly. We have online learning moodle , where we can find everything that is taught in the class also we get all updates and study materials here. We can submit our lab works and assignments here that can helps us to track all the things. Apart from this, we have got humble teachers who are very cooperative and helpful to us. As a non EU student, I feel these things are adorable to me.
Mykolas Romeris University is unlike anything I've ever seen; the quality of education here is insanely high, but it's more than just academics; it's about preparing you for practical problems! Our lecturers don't just teach us from textbooks; they use their personal experiences and industry connections to paint a vivid picture of what awaits us outside the confines of a notebook or classroom. When we graduate, we are more than just theoretical specialists; we are problem solvers who are ready to leap headfirst.
Nothing to show
I am currently studying in the Tourism and Recreation programme and have completed four semesters. Overall, my experience at SMK College of Applied Sciences has been positive. The programme combines theoretical knowledge with practical activities, helping students understand how the tourism and recreation industry works in real-life situations. The lecturers are generally supportive and willing to help students when needed. Classes cover a variety of topics related to tourism, hospitality, recreation, and business, which provides a broad understanding of the field. I also appreciate the opportunity to work on projects and assignments that encourage teamwork and problem-solving skills. The college has an international environment, allowing students to meet people from different countries and cultures. This makes studying more interesting and helps improve communication skills. One area that could be improved is the organization of some administrative processes, which can occasionally take longer than expected. However, this has not significantly affected my studies. I would recommend SMK College of Applied Sciences to students who are interested in tourism and recreation and are looking for a practical, career-oriented study programme.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
