Roskilde University - RUC vs Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical University vs Evelyn Hone College of Applied Arts and Commerce - Ehc vs Midlands State University vs Supershine University

Side-by-side comparison from 28 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Roskilde University - RUC: wins 0/5 categories
Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical University: wins 2/5 categories
Evelyn Hone College of Applied Arts and Commerce - Ehc: wins 1/5 categories
Midlands State University: wins 0/5 categories
Supershine University: wins 0/5 categories
Texila American University: wins 2/5 categories
Dovecot College of Nursing: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Global Humanities
Best programme: Bachelor of Nursing
Best programme: Education
Best programme: Peace and Conflict Studies
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
East Bank Demerara, Guyana
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Medicine and Surgery
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
5.00
Win
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.38
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
5.00
4.00
5.00
4.29
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.50
5.00
5.00
3.82
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Student life
4.00
Not rated
4.00
4.31
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Value
4.50
4.00
5.00
Win
4.47
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Accommodation
3.00
5.00
Win
3.00
4.20
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Student-centered, problem-based learning and projects
  • +Supportive, friendly, and interactive learning environment
  • +Diverse student body and international opportunities
  • +Diverse range of medical programs
  • +Positive and well-equipped university environment
  • +Fosters growth and independence through challenging, self-reliant learning.
  • +Top-tier lecturers and strong academic programmes
  • +Diverse student body and international exposure
  • +Opportunities for growth and career preparation

Nothing to show

  • +Diverse student body and multicultural interactions
  • +Abundant resources and supportive lecturers

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Lack of clear communication and organization from staff.
  • -Inadequate resources and outdated facilities.
  • -Insufficient feedback and support from instructors.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a common complaint.
  • -Students express dissatisfaction with the curriculum and teaching quality.
  • -Administrative & management issues are a significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
  • -Lack of communication and unresponsiveness from staff are major complaints.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -The curriculum is frequently perceived as irrelevant or too theoretical.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners excellent marks, particularly for its outstanding Professors (5/5) and impressive Internationality and Value (both 4.5/5). Facilities, Location, and Student Life all received strong scores of 4/5. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, which scored a 3/5. Overall, the university presents a highly positive picture with significant strengths in teaching quality and international appeal.

Impressively, this institution excels in its **Facilities** and **Accomodation**, both receiving perfect scores. **Internationality** also stands out with a top rating. Conversely, **Location** and **Student Life** received no scores, indicating potential areas for development. **Professors** and **Value** were rated positively, suggesting a solid academic and financial offering.

This institution excels in several key areas, notably achieving perfect scores for its professors and internationality, alongside a top rating for value. Student life and accommodation are also strengths, both receiving a solid four. Conversely, the university's location received a zero, indicating a significant area for improvement. Facilities also received a moderate rating of three.

This institution demonstrates a strong overall performance, with its **Value** and **Location** standing out as particularly high-rated areas. **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, and **Professors** also received very positive scores, indicating a well-rounded experience. The **Facilities** are rated well, though slightly lower than these top-performing categories. The **Internationality** score represents the weakest area in this assessment.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its professors, location, student life, and internationality. However, its facilities received a zero rating, indicating a significant area for improvement. Accommodation and value for money are rated moderately, suggesting a balanced but not exceptional experience in these aspects.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~88%), highlighting friendly and supportive learning environments, interactive teaching, and emphasis on group work. No negative feedback was provided.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight the variety of medical programs and a good university environment with available facilities. There is no negative feedback.

The university receives positive feedback, with one review rating it 4 out of 5 stars. This positive sentiment represents 100% of the feedback, highlighting a good learning environment that fosters independence and hard work.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with a 4.65 average rating. ~94% of feedback highlights top-tier lecturers, a nurturing learning culture, and diverse student experiences. A small amount of feedback (~6%) notes challenges with accommodation security and booking policies.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, all feedback is positive. Students highlight a diversity of international students and available resources. Admin staff are noted for needing improvement.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
38%
100%
0%
71%
0%
100%
0%
4★
25%
0%
100%
24%
0%
0%
0%
3★
38%
0%
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close