University of Kent vs Canterbury Christ Church University - CCCU vs Canterbury College vs Cats College vs Kent Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 143 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Kent Business School (4.60)
University of Kent: wins 0/7 categories
Canterbury Christ Church University - CCCU: wins 1/7 categories
Canterbury College: wins 0/7 categories
Cats College: wins 0/7 categories
Kent Business School: wins 6/7 categories
INSEEC Business School: wins 0/7 categories
University for the Creative Arts - UCA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Canterbury, The United Kingdom
4.10
Read more reviews
86 reviews
×
Best for: Arts & Humanities, Life Sciences & Medicine, Natural Sciences & Mathematics
Canterbury, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best for: Arts & Humanities, Life Sciences & Medicine, Social Sciences
Canterbury, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best for: Engineering & Technology, Life Sciences & Medicine, Social Sciences
Cambridge, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best for: Life Sciences & Medicine, Natural Sciences & Mathematics, Social Sciences
Canterbury, The United Kingdom
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
9 reviews
×
Best for: Social Sciences, Business & Management
Best for: Engineering & Technology, Social Sciences, Business & Management
Best for: Arts & Humanities, Engineering & Technology, Business & Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.19
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.78
Win
3.43
4.24
Location
4.20
4.21
Not rated
Not rated
4.88
Win
4.64
3.33
Professors
4.01
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.22
3.86
4.05
Internationality
4.39
3.85
Not rated
Not rated
4.78
Win
4.50
3.90
Student life
3.95
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.38
Win
4.07
3.39
Value
3.85
3.89
Not rated
Not rated
4.33
Win
3.64
3.95
Accommodation
3.92
4.04
Not rated
Not rated
4.22
Win
2.50
3.65
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality teaching and professor guidance
  • +Excellent campus facilities and student life
  • +Strong support services, including careers guidance
  • +Welcoming campus environment and good facilities
  • +Helpful staff and diverse academic programs
  • +Strong student welfare and inclusive community

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of student development focus.
  • -Insufficient support outside of academics.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause significant disruption.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Internationality stands out as the strongest rated aspect of the university, achieving a score of 4.39. Conversely, Value received the lowest rating at 3.85. Facilities and Location also scored well, while Professors and Student Life were rated slightly lower. Accomodation and Value represent the areas with the most room for improvement according to these metrics.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its **Facilities** and **Professors**, both receiving high marks. **Student Life** and **Accomodation** are also rated positively. Areas that received less enthusiastic feedback include **Internationality** and **Value**. **Location** falls somewhere in the middle, reflecting a solid but not exceptional standing.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~99% of reviews being positive, students praise high teaching levels, strong support, engaging professors, and good resources. A single negative review cited poor teaching and lack of student development focus.

With a 4.21 average rating, ~93% of reviews are positive, praising campus, facilities, and inclusivity. A small percentage (~7%) noted minor issues with event attendance and parking.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
22%
43%
0%
0%
56%
21%
25%
4★
64%
50%
0%
0%
44%
50%
45%
3★
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
43%
25%
2★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
Most useful review
Featured
Covid ruined the vibe

I think Kent is a good university if you make use of the resources around you. The lecturers on my course were very enthusiastic and ready to help with assignments. My course being small I believe I got a lot of 1 to 1 support. Covid however did play a huge part during the duration of my course. It left a lot of students including me very confused with how to access learning material, marking etc. I do also believe there was a lack of support after graduating. I don’t think there was another focus on job applications, interviews and the ‘real world’. However, I do not regret coming to Kent, I had learnt a lot and made a lot of enjoyable memories.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Learning in a practical way

This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.

Highly Unprofessional University

I found this to be a highly unprofessional university with very little interest in its students and their education. I undertook an MSc here and found the level of teaching to be extremely poor and not on par with the degree level. During my year at the university, I experienced the following: - The majority of lessons started off with technical difficulties that resulted in lessons losing half an hour.  - Tutors scheduled classes and then did not show up for them. Tutors were significantly late to lectures and then laughed about it. Tutors took annual leave during term time.  - Students were out of control and extremely disruptive, tutors did very little to resolve this issue and on numerous occasions laughed at and therefore encouraging their disruptive behaviour.  - I had lessons that were scheduled to be 2 hours long with 45-minute breaks, reducing the lesson time significantly.  - I attended lessons where the lecture was pre-recorded and played to us on the screen. I had to go to the university to watch a pre-recorded lesson over zoom.  - Lectures were not present at their own classes and took them over zoom, again we had to attend a class to sit and watch a lesson over zoom. In some cases, it took a number of weeks before I saw the tutor physically present in the classroom.  - The blended learning ended halfway through the year, and all students were required to attend all lectures in person with no exception. Which would have been fine had it not been extremely contradictory to the fact that half of the lessons were online classes as it was "more convenient” due to classes having 300+ students in with rooms only able to hold around 100. - I witnessed a significant number of students (I would estimate at around 50) being turned away from a class that they were scheduled to attend as the room held fewer students than were enrolled in the class , and the room was already full. I heard them being told they had to go to another room where the lesson was being streamed on a zoom call. I expressed concerns over marking as I felt that some of the feedback given was not in line with the work that was submitted. I felt that none of my queries were taken seriously and as a result of this, I feel that I have come away with less than I worked for.  I found that this university often made mistakes regarding the publications of awards. My records were updated with a mark that was significantly lower than the one stated on the work and when receiving my final publication I was being given the wrong degree. I felt as though the requirement for an MSc from this university was extremely low and not on par with what I would expect from a post graduate degree. The national average for a MSc Dissertation is between 15,000 and 20,000 words. The maximum word count for my MSc dissertation was 4000 - this is less that I was required to write for my BA. When I raised my concerns to the university I felt that I was met with a very detached and defensive approach and I was made to feel as though I was at fault. After this interaction, I felt cast aside and treated very differently by staff members. I feel that I have spent in excess of £10,000 to learn absolutely nothing. I am very ashamed to say that I attended this university and plan to keep that fact as hidden as possible. If I could go back I would avoid UCA and attend a faculty that takes education seriously. 

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close