New York University - NYU vs Hochschule Fresenius vs St. John's University vs Columbia University vs School16

Side-by-side comparison from 202 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Columbia University (4.40)
New York University - NYU: wins 1/7 categories
Hochschule Fresenius: wins 1/7 categories
St. John's University: wins 0/7 categories
Columbia University: wins 4/7 categories
School16: wins 0/7 categories
Flatiron School: wins 1/7 categories
Chegg Skills: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
New York City, United States
4.30
Read more reviews
121 reviews
×
Best programme: Biochemistry
Idstein, Germany
4.30
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Economics
New York City, United States
4.30
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Chemistry
New York City, United States
4.40
Top
Read more reviews
73 reviews
×
Best programme: Art and Design
New York City, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
New York City, United States
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Business
New York City, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.36
3.67
4.00
4.49
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.23
5.00
Win
4.50
4.36
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Professors
4.37
Win
4.00
4.25
4.37
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.33
3.67
4.25
4.44
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Student life
4.14
3.33
4.00
4.35
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Value
4.31
4.00
4.25
4.44
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.11
3.00
3.75
4.22
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Dedicated professors and academic rigor
  • +Supportive environment for integration and collaboration
  • +Vibrant student life and modern facilities
  • +Relevant and varied course content
  • +Helpful and educated faculty
  • +Supportive university staff
  • +Supportive supervisors and accessible postgraduate programs
  • +Abundant student organizations and walkable campus
  • +Helpful staff and faculty for student issues
  • +Supportive and passionate faculty
  • +Diverse and thoughtful food options
  • +Affordable and accessible accommodation

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive, knowledgeable staff and comprehensive curriculum
  • +Strong job placement and career support

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Poor educational outcomes and value for money.
  • -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment
  • -Lack of resources and support
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major drawbacks.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a persistent problem.
  • -Communication is frequently unclear and inadequate.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Generally speaking, this university garners solid ratings across multiple facets. Professors and Facilities stand out as the strongest areas, both scoring above 4.3. Student Life and Accommodations represent areas for potential improvement, with ratings around 4.1. Location, Internationality, and Value also receive favorable marks, generally within the 4.2-4.3 range.

With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.

The university demonstrates a consistently strong performance across multiple aspects. Its location and internationality are particularly well-regarded, achieving the highest ratings. Professors and value also receive excellent scores. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, which, while still good, is rated lower than other categories. Student life and facilities are also solid, indicating a well-rounded experience.

An analysis of the provided ratings reveals a university that excels in several key areas. Facilities stand out with a score of 4.49, closely followed by Internationality and Value, both receiving 4.44. Professors and Location also score highly at 4.37. Student Life is rated well at 4.35. The lowest rated aspect is Accomodation, with a score of 4.22, suggesting this is an area for potential improvement.

Nothing to show

Overall, this institution garners consistently strong reviews across key aspects. Its strongest area is undoubtedly accommodation, receiving a perfect score, while facilities, professors, location, student life, internationality, and perceived value all achieve a solid 4 out of 5. This indicates a well-rounded university experience with a particular advantage in housing.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.28/5 from 121 reviews, ~99% are positive. Students praise academic excellence, supportive professors, and a collaborative environment. Minimal negative feedback exists.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with a 4.25 average rating. Students highlight competitive programs, helpful supervisors, affordable postgraduate options, and engaging campus life with many organizations. A small amount of feedback noted recent tuition increases and changes post-pandemic.

University feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~99%), with students praising the engaging academics and passionate professors. Some mention food variety and accommodation limitations.

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, the student experience is highly positive (~100%). The reviewer highlights knowledgeable and supportive staff, a well-structured curriculum, and strong job placement resources.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
41%
33%
25%
42%
0%
0%
0%
4★
46%
67%
75%
52%
0%
100%
0%
3★
12%
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
2★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Well structured course

Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close