New York University - NYU vs International School of Management vs St. John's University vs Columbia University vs Fordham University
Side-by-side comparison from 244 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic programs and accomplished faculty
- +Excellent career prospects and networking opportunities
- +Supportive and inclusive community environment
- +Expert professors and quality cohorts
- +Flexible learning and personalized support
- +Global exposure and networking opportunities
- +Supportive supervisors and accessible postgraduate programs
- +Abundant student organizations and walkable campus
- +Helpful staff and faculty for student issues
- +Supportive and passionate faculty
- +Diverse and thoughtful food options
- +Affordable and accessible accommodation
- +prime NYC location with diverse cultural and career opportunities
- +strong support for academic and career success, including financial aid
- +caring and dedicated professors and staff
- +Supportive, knowledgeable staff and comprehensive curriculum
- +Strong job placement and career support
- +Experiential learning and practical application of business concepts
- +High-quality instruction and direct industry leader engagement
- +International exposure and strong peer networking opportunities
- -Lack of learning and value for money
- -Significant student debt
- -Poor communication and administrative issues are common complaints.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or in disrepair.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and equipment
- -Lack of resources and support
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major drawbacks.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a recurring problem.
- -Inadequate career and networking support for science students.
- -High price point not justified by academic programs.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a persistent problem.
- -Communication is frequently unclear and inadequate.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor resources detract from learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
This institution demonstrates a strong overall performance with particularly high marks for its professors. Facilities also received a very favorable rating. Conversely, student life and accommodation represent the areas with slightly lower, though still positive, scores. Internationality and value for money are also rated highly, indicating a well-rounded university experience.
This institution garners exceptional praise, particularly for its professors and international student experience, both scoring a near-perfect 4.82. Facilities, location, and accommodation also received strong marks around 4.64. Student life earned a solid 4.5, while value was rated a commendable 4.73. The university's weakest area, though still strong, is student life.
The university demonstrates a consistently strong performance across multiple aspects. Its location and internationality are particularly well-regarded, achieving the highest ratings. Professors and value also receive excellent scores. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, which, while still good, is rated lower than other categories. Student life and facilities are also solid, indicating a well-rounded experience.
An analysis of the provided ratings reveals a university that excels in several key areas. Facilities stand out with a score of 4.49, closely followed by Internationality and Value, both receiving 4.44. Professors and Location also score highly at 4.37. Student Life is rated well at 4.35. The lowest rated aspect is Accomodation, with a score of 4.22, suggesting this is an area for potential improvement.
Considerably high ratings across surveyed aspects indicate a well-rounded university experience. The location stands out as the strongest attribute, receiving the highest score. Conversely, value for money, while still positive, is the lowest-rated category. Other areas such as professors, facilities, student life, accommodation, and internationality all fall within a similar, positive range.
Overall, this institution garners consistently strong reviews across key aspects. Its strongest area is undoubtedly accommodation, receiving a perfect score, while facilities, professors, location, student life, internationality, and perceived value all achieve a solid 4 out of 5. This indicates a well-rounded university experience with a particular advantage in housing.
This institution garners exceptionally high marks, particularly excelling in Student Life with a perfect score. Facilities, Location, and Accomodation are also strong, all receiving 4.5 ratings. Professors and Value are rated highly at 4.67. The lowest score, though still solid, is for Internationality at 4.33.
With an average rating of 4.29/5 from 123 reviews, nearly all feedback is positive (~99%). Students praise academic rigor, accessible faculty, and diverse community. One negative review expressed regret over student debt.
All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students praise the high quality of professors, impressive and diverse student cohorts, and flexible learning options. The curriculum is described as relevant and contemporary, fostering significant personal and career growth.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with a 4.25 average rating. Students highlight competitive programs, helpful supervisors, affordable postgraduate options, and engaging campus life with many organizations. A small amount of feedback noted recent tuition increases and changes post-pandemic.
University feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~99%), with students praising the engaging academics and passionate professors. Some mention food variety and accommodation limitations.
Most (around 96%) of reviews are positive, praising the New York City location, diverse opportunities, and academic instruction. One review noted a lack of support for science careers.
With a 4/5 average rating from one review, the student experience is highly positive (~100%). The reviewer highlights knowledgeable and supportive staff, a well-structured curriculum, and strong job placement resources.
With an average rating of 4.75/5 from four reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight hands-on learning, business idea development, and valuable connections with industry leaders and peers as significant benefits. Minimal negative feedback was present.
Nothing to show
I am just starting my PhD journey and I could not be happier with my choice in ISM. Amazing experience with quality professors AND impressive cohorts. Working full-time, this educational focus would not be feasible if I was not able to be flexible as to when and where I take my classes. It is a tough, long, and robust path that requires focus, but the team at ISM is truly the best. They help navigate the way that will work best for you and not put you in a 'one way fits all' situation to accomplish this massive step. I wanted a global education that was through a recognized, accredited, and respected school and ISM has not just been that, but so much more.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
