Mataram University - Unram vs The Alice Salomon University of Applied Sciences Berlin vs Tshwane University of Technology - TUT vs Università degli studi della Repubblica di San Marino vs European University of the Atlantic - UNEAT

Side-by-side comparison from 84 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: European University of the Atlantic - UNEAT (5.00)
Mataram University - Unram: wins 0/7 categories
The Alice Salomon University of Applied Sciences Berlin: wins 0/7 categories
Tshwane University of Technology - TUT: wins 1/7 categories
Università degli studi della Repubblica di San Marino: wins 0/7 categories
European University of the Atlantic - UNEAT: wins 6/7 categories
Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram: wins 0/7 categories
Politeknik Pertanian Negeri Kupang: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Information and Communication Technology
Best programme: Business and Enterprise Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
Not rated
4.32
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
Location
Not rated
Not rated
4.29
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Professors
4.50
Not rated
4.25
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
Internationality
4.00
Not rated
3.99
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
Student life
4.50
Not rated
4.38
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
Value
4.00
Not rated
4.47
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
4.50
Not rated
4.14
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse and complete study programs
  • +Improved facilities and infrastructure
  • +Strong graduate employability

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, career-focused, and hands-on learning
  • +Diverse and supportive campus life with experienced professors
  • +Accessible campus facilities and good staff support

Nothing to show

  • +Modern facilities and comfortable location
  • +Diverse international community
  • +High-quality teaching staff

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -The facilities are outdated and in need of renovation.
  • -The quality of teaching and curriculum is disappointing.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Course content is often irrelevant or poorly delivered.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources are a constant problem.
  • -Poor teaching quality and a disconnect with curriculum expectations are common complaints.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this institution receives excellent marks in several key areas, with Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accomodation all rated a strong 4.5. Internationality and Value are also highly regarded at 4 and 4 respectively. The most significant weakness identified is its Location, which received a score of 0.

Nothing to show

This institution achieves impressive scores in several key areas. Student life and value stand out as its strongest aspects, both exceeding 4.4. Facilities and accommodation also received favorable ratings. However, internationality represents the weakest area, scoring just under 4.0, indicating room for improvement in fostering a global campus environment.

Nothing to show

Exceptional scores define this university's offerings, with perfect marks awarded for its facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. The only area falling slightly below this perfect standard is its location, which still garners a strong rating of 4. This indicates a consistently outstanding experience with particularly notable strengths in academic and campus life quality.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 3.6/5, university reviews are predominantly positive (~60%). Students appreciate the diverse study programs and career prospects. A small amount of negative feedback (~20%) points to less than ideal facilities, though some improvements have been noted.

Nothing to show

With ~74% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.55/5, students highlight practical, career-focused learning and a diverse, supportive campus environment. Minimal negative feedback was noted.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, the single review highlights a pleasant atmosphere, excellent facilities, and a strong sense of community. The location and teaching staff were also positively noted.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
20%
0%
58%
0%
100%
0%
0%
4★
40%
0%
38%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
20%
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
100%
2★
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Marketing

I enjoyed every minute of going to campus, the environment is very conducive to learning and making friends at the same time. I would recommend this university. The University has over 9 campuses in three different Provinces/States.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close