ESCP Business School vs Warsaw University of Technology vs University of Euroregional Economy - WSGE vs Vistula University vs Zabielski Foundation

Side-by-side comparison from 253 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: ESCP Business School (4.40)
ESCP Business School: wins 2/7 categories
Warsaw University of Technology: wins 2/7 categories
University of Euroregional Economy - WSGE: wins 3/7 categories
Vistula University: wins 0/7 categories
Zabielski Foundation: wins 0/7 categories
VIZJA University: wins 0/7 categories
Warsaw University of Business - WWSB: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
4.40
Top
Read more reviews
42 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor in Management
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Warsaw, Poland
4.00
Read more reviews
128 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Warsaw, Poland
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Warsaw, Poland
4.20
Read more reviews
43 reviews
×
Best programme: Psychology
Best programme: IT Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.07
4.27
Win
4.25
3.88
Not rated
4.16
4.00
Location
4.33
4.74
Win
3.67
4.32
Not rated
4.33
4.30
Professors
4.10
4.35
4.50
Win
4.02
Not rated
4.19
4.10
Internationality
4.80
Win
3.74
4.25
4.59
Not rated
4.23
4.10
Student life
4.17
4.22
4.50
Win
3.90
Not rated
3.92
3.80
Value
4.39
Win
4.35
4.25
3.86
Not rated
3.93
4.30
Accommodation
3.26
3.78
4.00
Win
3.16
Not rated
3.60
3.30
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +European campuses and multicultural environment
  • +Strong career preparation and top company recruitment
  • +Development of interpersonal and managerial skills
  • +Excellent faculty expertise and teaching quality
  • +Interesting and practical programs with industry relevance
  • +Engaging learning environment and student experience
  • +Affordable tuition and helpful staff
  • +Supportive professors and direct student contact
  • +Accessible location near Warsaw
  • +Diverse and inclusive international environment
  • +Supportive and practical learning experience
  • +Welcoming atmosphere and good facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Strong academic programs and accreditations
  • +Commitment to student development and success
  • +Practical learning through internships and workshops
  • +International environment and practical learning
  • +Supportive faculty and experienced lecturers
  • +Personal growth and networking opportunities
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor campus infrastructure are a recurring problem.
  • -The curriculum often lacks practical application and relevance.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are perceived as ineffective or irrelevant.
  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt student experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and unclear communication cause frustration.
  • -Administrative inefficiencies and excessive wait times for simple tasks.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unclear curriculum focus.
  • -Lack of student support and unwelcoming faculty interaction.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and registration errors cause significant hassle and unexpected costs.
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of engaging learning environments are prevalent.
  • -Inadequate student support, including limited facilities and poor communication, detracts from the experience.
  • -Administrative & management issues lead to poor responsiveness and disappearing support after tuition payment.
Rating summary
What students say

Across various aspects, this institution shows considerable strengths, particularly in **Internationality**, earning a near-perfect score. **Location** and **Value** also received very high marks. Student life and professors are rated positively, as are facilities. However, the lowest-rated category is **Accomodation**, indicating an area for potential improvement.

This institution receives high marks in several key areas. Its strongest performance is in **Location**, followed closely by **Professors** and **Value**. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also rate well. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** emerge as the comparatively weaker aspects, receiving the lowest scores among the surveyed categories.

Overall, this university garners strong ratings, particularly excelling in its **Professors** and **Student Life**, both achieving a high score of 4.5. The **Facilities**, **Internationality**, and **Value** also stand out with solid marks of 4.25. While **Accomodation** receives a good rating of 4, the **Location** emerges as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower at 2.75.

With outstanding marks for its internationality, this university also excels in location. Areas for improvement include accommodation, which received the lowest score, and facilities, though still solid. Professors, student life, and value all garnered respectable ratings, indicating a generally positive student experience.

Nothing to show

An overall positive assessment emerges from these university ratings, with the institution excelling in **Location** (4.37) and **Internationality** (4.24). **Facilities** and **Professors** also receive high marks, both scoring approximately 4.17. The areas receiving the lowest scores are **Accomodation** (3.59), indicating room for improvement in this aspect, followed by **Student Life** and **Value**, both rated around 3.9.

The university demonstrates notable strengths in key areas. Location and value receive particularly high scores, suggesting excellent external factors and return on investment. Internationality and professors are also well-regarded. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, indicating room for improvement. Student life and facilities also score moderately, suggesting these aspects could benefit from enhancement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 97.6% of reviews are positive, highlighting rewarding experiences, multicultural environments, and personal/professional growth. A single negative review mentioned the EMIB program should be updated.

With an average rating of 4.21/5 from 24 reviews, ~91% are positive. Students praise excellent faculty, engaging teaching, and positive learning environments. No negative reviews were reported.

With an average rating of 4.17/5 from 6 reviews, about 83% of feedback is highly positive. Students praise affordable tuition, helpful staff, direct lecturer support, and the university's positive environment. No negative feedback was provided.

With an average rating of 3.98/5, ~74% of 128 reviews are positive, praising diversity and international student support. A small percentage (~8.6%) of reviews mention administrative delays and some professor communication issues.

Nothing to show

With a 4.19/5 rating from 42 reviews, approximately 86% highlight positive aspects like university development, program quality, and organized processes. A small ~5% of feedback points to issues with administrative errors and a perceived lack of student immersion.

With an average rating of 4/5, approximately 80% of reviews are highly positive, praising the international environment, supportive faculty, and practical learning. A small amount of negative feedback (~10%) mentions administrative responsiveness issues after payment.

Rating distribution
5★
55%
33%
33%
33%
0%
42%
40%
4★
38%
54%
50%
44%
0%
44%
40%
3★
5%
13%
17%
15%
0%
9%
10%
2★
0%
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
1★
2%
0%
0%
3%
0%
5%
10%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great international exposure

To me, studying at ESCP has been a really rewarding experience. The multicultural environment helped me grow both personally and professionally. Professors are very supportive and bring real-world insights into the classroom. I rlly liked the flexibility to study in different campuses across Europe. Although some admin processes can be slow, but overall I felt well-prepared for the job market.

Aerospace Engineering Bachelor's

Well defined and well-maintained classes with highly trained professors. They are very much timely and can happily assist you and your questions during consultation 1 to 1. You can learn a great deal of Aerospace Engineering tools and get inspired by student clubs flying rockets and gliders, and racing cars.

My vision

University is very good, coordination between students and professors is nice, work ethics is appreciable,subjects related to topic and clear whole concepts about subject and atmosphere of university is very nice.

Supportive Environment and Practical Learning

Vistula University offers a supportive academic environment with experienced faculty and diverse international students. I appreciated the practical approach to learning and access to industry-related projects. The administrative processes could be improved, but overall, I would definitely recommend it to students seeking a globally oriented education.

Nothing to show

Arts and Culture

The art studios are equipped with the necessary tools and materials for creative expression. The school auditorium hosts various cultural events and performances, providing a platform for students to showcase their talents.

Review

Personally, I think wwsb is one of the best private universities in Poland. It’s not just a place to study but a place to gain personal growth, networking opportunities, and the chance to contribute to research and innovation. The staffs are very friendly, teaching method is very unique and students can grasp what they’re being taught within a short period of time. Although there are no on-campus accommodations, the university helps you search for off-campus accommodation/apartment which I think is very good. The school is also situated at a very good location which makes the studying atmosphere wonderful.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close