Central European University - CEU vs Budapest Business University - BBU vs Eötvös Loránd University - ELTE vs Corvinus Business School vs Budapest Metropolitan University
Side-by-side comparison from 79 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse student body and international perspective
- +High academic rigor and intellectual stimulation
- +Expert faculty and dedicated mentorship
- +Practical knowledge and real-world application
- +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
- +Strong student support and well-structured courses
- +Excellent professors and clear explanations
- +Rigorous and well-structured programs
- +Broad and interesting study options
- +Challenging and skill-enriching academic environment
- +Positive overall experience despite external factors
- +Supportive scholarship opportunities
- +Unique, broad, and exploratory learning approach
- +Modern, open-minded environment
- +Friendly, international learning environment
- +Supportive professors, practical business concepts
- +Organized classes, useful study materials
Nothing to show
- -Rigid academic structure and lack of intellectual engagement.
- -Insufficient financial aid and rising tuition fees.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues.
- -Unprofessional teaching staff and language barriers.
- -Disorganized structure and struggles with course registration.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations create confusion.
- -Administrative and management issues are a constant source of frustration.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content and teaching methods are frequently seen as unengaging and irrelevant.
- -Lack of practical skills and real-world application in the curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a common complaint.
Nothing to show
Internationality stands out as the strongest area, achieving an impressive rating. Conversely, facilities present the weakest aspect, with a score of 3.56. Other areas like professors and student life received strong marks, while location, accommodation, and value also scored positively, indicating a generally well-regarded institution with distinct strengths and some room for improvement in its physical infrastructure.
This university garners a strong overall rating, with Location emerging as its most celebrated aspect. Professors and Value are also highly regarded. Conversely, Accomodation received the lowest score. Student Life and Facilities are mid-range, while Internationality is also a notable strength. The university presents a generally positive picture, with distinct areas of excellence and areas for potential improvement.
Regarding university ratings, the strongest area is undeniably Location, scoring a remarkable 4.62. Internationality and Value also received high marks, both exceeding 4.1. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the weakest point, with a rating of 3.23. Facilities and Student Life received moderate scores around 3.7, while Professors were rated positively at approximately 4.1.
This institution garners exceptional marks for its **location, student life, internationality, and overall value**, all receiving perfect scores. The quality of its **professors** is also highly praised. However, areas for improvement are evident in **facilities and accommodation**, which received lower, albeit still adequate, ratings.
This university presents a generally positive but mixed picture. Its strongest areas include Internationality, scoring a solid 4. Professors also received a commendable rating of 3.67. Conversely, Student Life and Accommodation are its weakest points, both averaging a 3. Facilities, Location, and Value are all rated moderately at 3.33.
Overall, this institution demonstrates a solid performance across multiple facets of student experience. Its location receives the highest mark, a testament to its desirable setting. Conversely, accommodation stands out as the weakest area, suggesting potential room for improvement in this regard. Other aspects like facilities, professors, student life, internationality, and value are all rated positively, indicating a well-rounded educational environment.
Nothing to show
~70% of reviews are positive, highlighting diversity, teaching methods, and faculty expertise. ~20% of feedback is negative, citing rigid academic structure and a lack of critical engagement.
~57% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical knowledge and professional, up-to-date teachers. ~9.5% of feedback indicates issues with communication and organization.
With an average rating of 4.09/5 from 43 reviews, ~74% are positive. Students praise rigorous and well-structured programs with knowledgeable professors and a broad curriculum. Some mention administrative disorganization and language barriers with certain staff.
This university receives very positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being 4-5 stars. Students highlight the nourishing of skills and a competitive yet positive environment. Accommodation costs are noted as high.
With an average rating of 3/5, student feedback is mixed. Approximately 33% of reviews are negative, citing a lack of technical skills and real-world experience. Positive comments highlight the university's unique, modern, and open-minded approach.
With one review available, the university has a 4/5 average rating. The feedback highlights a friendly, international environment and supportive professors. No negative feedback was received.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
In general, I would say this school has a lack of communication with its employees. Both with student consultants and teachers so they have a lack of information in several important questions. In that case, if we have information and we know everything we need to then the bürocratic system of the school makes it harder to get what we desire within the foreseeable future. If we need to hand in any type of request we have to pay big enough amounts and this doesn't even ensure we get the answer we would like. There is no refund. Another important negative is that teachers' English knowledge is quite weak, the grammar and vocabulary as well, honourable expections. Project tasks are often not life-like, most students don't like these and try to get them from friends in higher grades. Lectures and seminars are mostly very boring because a bigger part of the teachers is just talking without asking students to give feedback. Of course, not all teachers are like this because there are angels as well who do their best. Most positives are given by hard-working, clever and experienced students who try to give as much help and information as possible. I would say they are the heart of this school and they are the people who organize nice events and make the student life good. The English program is very international there are Asian, African and middle-eastern students as well. I would not recommend this university at all. If this time I spent and will spend here will help me build my career it will be only because of the friends I make here however it is easier to find a job with a degree. So all together the school should improve its communication and should provide more language training for its teachers.
There is a big variety of departments to choose from, including ones that are the only available ones within the country. Unfortunately on the other hand, the organization and communication of the institution was not on the level of quality that one would expect from one of the top universities in the country. Regarding the quality of education, I had very mixed experiences as there are big differences within the departments and among the professors.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
