Central European University - CEU vs Budapest Business University - BBU vs Eötvös Loránd University - ELTE vs ESSCA School of Management vs Budapest Metropolitan University
Side-by-side comparison from 125 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse student body and international perspective
- +High academic rigor and intellectual stimulation
- +Expert faculty and dedicated mentorship
- +Practical knowledge and real-world application
- +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
- +Strong student support and well-structured courses
- +Excellent professors and clear explanations
- +Rigorous and well-structured programs
- +Broad and interesting study options
- +High-quality, practical education with flexible pathways
- +Vibrant campus life with numerous activities and events
- +Supportive and international learning environment
- +Unique, broad, and exploratory learning approach
- +Modern, open-minded environment
- +Innovative learning environment and supportive community
- +Internationalization and cultural diversity
- +Accomplished faculty and top-notch facilities
- +Practical, up-to-date curriculum with real-world focus
- +Affordable, international study environment
- +Welcoming city with good social opportunities
- -Rigid academic structure and lack of intellectual engagement.
- -Insufficient financial aid and rising tuition fees.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues.
- -Unprofessional teaching staff and language barriers.
- -Disorganized structure and struggles with course registration.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations create confusion.
- -Poorly prepared and unhelpful professors.
- -Disorganized and irrelevant course content.
- -High cost for low value.
- -Lack of practical skills and real-world application in the curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of adequate support and communication leaves students feeling unsupported.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
Internationality stands out as the strongest area, achieving an impressive rating. Conversely, facilities present the weakest aspect, with a score of 3.56. Other areas like professors and student life received strong marks, while location, accommodation, and value also scored positively, indicating a generally well-regarded institution with distinct strengths and some room for improvement in its physical infrastructure.
This university garners a strong overall rating, with Location emerging as its most celebrated aspect. Professors and Value are also highly regarded. Conversely, Accomodation received the lowest score. Student Life and Facilities are mid-range, while Internationality is also a notable strength. The university presents a generally positive picture, with distinct areas of excellence and areas for potential improvement.
Regarding university ratings, the strongest area is undeniably Location, scoring a remarkable 4.62. Internationality and Value also received high marks, both exceeding 4.1. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the weakest point, with a rating of 3.23. Facilities and Student Life received moderate scores around 3.7, while Professors were rated positively at approximately 4.1.
Overall, the university demonstrates a solid performance across various aspects. Its strongest areas are **Location** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.18), suggesting these are significant advantages. **Accomodation** (3.48) received the lowest score, indicating potential room for improvement in this category. Other ratings for Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value are all above 3.8, indicating generally positive feedback.
This university presents a generally positive but mixed picture. Its strongest areas include Internationality, scoring a solid 4. Professors also received a commendable rating of 3.67. Conversely, Student Life and Accommodation are its weakest points, both averaging a 3. Facilities, Location, and Value are all rated moderately at 3.33.
This institution garners strong marks across several aspects. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, followed closely by accommodation. Professors and student life also received commendable scores. While facilities and internationality performed well, the value proposition emerged as the lowest-rated category. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded profile with a particular strength in its physical setting and living arrangements.
This university garners high marks in several key areas, with Internationality and Location being particularly strong at 4.64 and 4.57 respectively. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive excellent scores, all above 4.35. Accommodations are rated well at 4.21. Student Life, however, is the weakest area with a rating of 3.8.
~70% of reviews are positive, highlighting diversity, teaching methods, and faculty expertise. ~20% of feedback is negative, citing rigid academic structure and a lack of critical engagement.
~57% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical knowledge and professional, up-to-date teachers. ~9.5% of feedback indicates issues with communication and organization.
With an average rating of 4.09/5 from 43 reviews, ~74% are positive. Students praise rigorous and well-structured programs with knowledgeable professors and a broad curriculum. Some mention administrative disorganization and language barriers with certain staff.
With a 3.96 average rating from 23 reviews, ~82% highlight the school's high-quality education, diverse academic pathways, and vibrant campus life. A small portion (~9%) reported unprepared professors and organizational issues.
With an average rating of 3/5, student feedback is mixed. Approximately 33% of reviews are negative, citing a lack of technical skills and real-world experience. Positive comments highlight the university's unique, modern, and open-minded approach.
The University of Miskolc receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~91% of reviews being highly favorable. Students praise cutting-edge labs, approachable professors, a supportive community, and internationalization. No negative feedback was noted.
~93% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical, up-to-date curricula and hands-on learning. Negative feedback, representing ~0%, was not provided.
Nothing to show
The environment is good and it’s multicultural The compound is really nice but a bit far(depending on the faculty) They should have a sports team because of the facilities that they have They should really consider the sports career of the university
There is a big variety of departments to choose from, including ones that are the only available ones within the country. Unfortunately on the other hand, the organization and communication of the institution was not on the level of quality that one would expect from one of the top universities in the country. Regarding the quality of education, I had very mixed experiences as there are big differences within the departments and among the professors.
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My experience with the Business Development Master’s program has been really great overall. It offers high-quality education with practical knowledge. The courses are well-structured. The program has been renewed and designed to match current business trends, not just old-school textbook knowledge. We worked on a bunch of case studies, group projects, and presentations. We also experienced real business scenarios in every semester from subjects like Project Management, Tutorial: Startup Lab, Marketing Analysis and Planning, ESG, etc. Another important factor is affordability. Compared to many other master’s programs in Europe, this one gives really good value for money. You’re getting a strong education, experienced lecturers, and a modern curriculum, without the crazy tuition fees you’d expect elsewhere. The programme also feels fresh and up-to-date. Topics like innovation, strategy, and business development are approached in a way that reflects what’s actually happening in the business world today. The atmosphere is great. The community is diverse, and working with people from different backgrounds adds a lot to the experience. Plus you can meet different cultures and get new friends from all around the World. Also the study department is a huge help for every student. I used to be a Student Representative and working with the staff was easy, because they supported and informed us constantly. Overall, I’d say the Business Development Master’s at PTE KTK is a great choice if you’re looking for something modern, practical, and affordable, without sacrificing quality.
