Universidad Autónoma de Durango - UAD vs Universidad La Salle - ULSA vs Instituto Tecnológico de Durango - ITDURANGO vs Universidad José Vasconcelos - UJV vs Instituto Tecnológico Valle del Guadiana - ITVG

Side-by-side comparison from 37 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad Autónoma de Durango - UAD: wins 0/0 categories
Universidad La Salle - ULSA: wins 0/0 categories
Instituto Tecnológico de Durango - ITDURANGO: wins 0/0 categories
Universidad José Vasconcelos - UJV: wins 0/0 categories
Instituto Tecnológico Valle del Guadiana - ITVG: wins 0/0 categories
Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango - UJED: wins 0/0 categories
Universidad España de Durango - UNES: wins 0/0 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Fashion Design
Best programme: Applied Psychology
Best programme: Communication Sciences
Best programme: Political Science
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.67
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Location
5.00
4.33
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Professors
5.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Internationality
3.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Student life
5.00
4.33
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Value
5.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
5.00
3.67
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent teachers and well-trained staff
  • +Good and comfortable facilities
  • +Positive learning atmosphere and student-teacher respect
  • +High academic quality and recognition
  • +Friendly environment and humanistic values
  • +Helpful professors and staff

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent educational quality and practical preparation
  • +Strong ethical and committed graduates
  • +High career readiness and employment opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +Openness to student ideas and initiatives
  • +Professional and personal growth opportunities
  • +Knowledgeable and approachable professors
  • +Strong education with values and interesting projects
  • +Easy creation procedures
  • +Good school reputation
Cons
  • -Poor administrative support and unclear communication.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources.
  • -Ineffective teaching and curriculum delivery.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication breakdowns and lack of support are recurring problems.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are a significant concern.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often described as poor or irrelevant.

Nothing to show

  • -Inadequate administrative and management support leads to frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations create uncertainty.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as ineffective or unengaging.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners exceptional scores in several key areas, with professors, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value all receiving perfect marks. Facilities are rated highly at a commendable four out of five. The university's internationality is its weakest point, scoring three out of five. Overall, it presents a very strong offering with minor room for improvement in global engagement.

This institution garners exceptionally high marks for its **Facilities**, achieving a score of 4.67. Its **Location** and **Student Life** are also well-regarded, both receiving 4.33. While **Professors** and **Internationality** are rated a solid 4, and **Value** at 4, the **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area with a score of 3.67.

Nothing to show

This institution garners exceptional marks in every assessed domain. The university excels uniformly, with perfect scores in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. No single area stands out as a weakness, as all aspects of the university experience are rated at the highest possible level.

Nothing to show

This institution garners exceptional praise across multiple facets, achieving a perfect score in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, and Internationality. Its weakest area, while still strong, is Value, scoring a 4 out of 5. This suggests an outstanding overall experience where students perceive high quality across the board, with only minor reservations regarding financial return.

Across all surveyed categories, the university received a uniform score of zero. This indicates no specific strengths or weaknesses were identified in its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or overall value. The consistent rating suggests a need for comprehensive review and potential improvement in all aspects of the university's offerings.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The overwhelming majority (~100%) of reviews are highly positive, praising excellent facilities, well-trained teachers, and a positive student/teacher atmosphere. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4.27/5 from 15 reviews, ~87% of feedback is positive. Students highlight high academic quality, excellent learning environments, and helpful staff. Location is a minor point for improvement.

Nothing to show

All 8 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students report an amazing and rewarding experience, highlighting the university's high educational quality, practical skill development, and graduates' strong competitiveness.

Nothing to show

University reviews are predominantly positive (~67% 4-5 stars), with students appreciating open communication and opportunities for initiatives. A small amount of feedback exists with no negative reviews.

With a single review, this university receives a perfect 5/5 rating, indicating overwhelmingly positive sentiment. The student highlighted strong program quality and an easy creation procedure.

Rating distribution
5★
60%
40%
0%
100%
0%
33%
100%
4★
30%
47%
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
3★
10%
13%
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

University that creates useful people

It is a university of very good educational quality, the students not only graduate with knowledge, also with practice, which helps when you finish the degree. In particular I left the university with experience and work proposals compared to colleagues from other universities, companies and businesses will always look for people who like less preparation, that is the advantage I've seen for years of ujv students .

Nothing to show

It's not the same anymore

Proud to be when I did not belong to the government and maintained an exemplary academic level, I hope one day it will be as good as it was in those beautiful days, especially to recover that prestige at the national level

Good school program!

The program school is good but UNES. In fact, I recommend UNES, education with values and interesting final projects, the creation procedure in UNES is so good and easier that others universities. For to be better UNES needs teachers with more experience in work.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close