Moscow State University of Printing Arts - MGUP vs Evelyn Hone College of Applied Arts and Commerce - Ehc vs Midlands State University vs Supershine University vs Texila American University
Side-by-side comparison from 22 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging classes with practical application
- +Exceptional professors encouraging discussion and offering support
- +Rewarding academic challenges
- +Fosters growth and independence through challenging, self-reliant learning.
- +Top-tier lecturers and strong academic programmes
- +Diverse student body and international exposure
- +Opportunities for growth and career preparation
Nothing to show
- +Diverse student body and multicultural interactions
- +Abundant resources and supportive lecturers
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues create an unwelcoming atmosphere.
- -Insufficient space and outdated facilities detract from the learning environment.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a common complaint.
- -Students express dissatisfaction with the curriculum and teaching quality.
- -Administrative & management issues are a significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
- -Lack of communication and unresponsiveness from staff are major complaints.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -The curriculum is frequently perceived as irrelevant or too theoretical.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Receiving perfect scores across the board, this institution demonstrates outstanding strengths in every evaluated aspect. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated a perfect 5. With such uniformly excellent feedback, identifying a weakest area is not possible; the university excels across the entire spectrum of student experience.
This institution excels in several key areas, notably achieving perfect scores for its professors and internationality, alongside a top rating for value. Student life and accommodation are also strengths, both receiving a solid four. Conversely, the university's location received a zero, indicating a significant area for improvement. Facilities also received a moderate rating of three.
This institution demonstrates a strong overall performance, with its **Value** and **Location** standing out as particularly high-rated areas. **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, and **Professors** also received very positive scores, indicating a well-rounded experience. The **Facilities** are rated well, though slightly lower than these top-performing categories. The **Internationality** score represents the weakest area in this assessment.
Nothing to show
This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its professors, location, student life, and internationality. However, its facilities received a zero rating, indicating a significant area for improvement. Accommodation and value for money are rated moderately, suggesting a balanced but not exceptional experience in these aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a 3/5 average rating, reviews highlight engaging classes and helpful professors (~33% positive). However, some negative feedback points to issues with budget allocation and library facilities (~33% negative).
The university receives positive feedback, with one review rating it 4 out of 5 stars. This positive sentiment represents 100% of the feedback, highlighting a good learning environment that fosters independence and hard work.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with a 4.65 average rating. ~94% of feedback highlights top-tier lecturers, a nurturing learning culture, and diverse student experiences. A small amount of feedback (~6%) notes challenges with accommodation security and booking policies.
Nothing to show
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, all feedback is positive. Students highlight a diversity of international students and available resources. Admin staff are noted for needing improvement.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Entering this educational institution into the correspondence form of training with the use of distance educational technologies (DOT), I expected a lot of interesting lectures, seminars and skype conferences with teachers. However, the reality of me admitted a lot of surprise. Video-lectures turned out to be very small, Skype conferences were not in sight. Instead of exams and preparation for them, intermediate tests for 10-15-20-25 questions are used, which after the n-th passage begin to be repeated, the exam in total consists of 40-45 assignments.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show