University of Gothenburg vs Umea University - UMU vs Malmö University - MAU vs Stockholm Business School vs Dalarna University

Side-by-side comparison from 34 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Hyper Island (5.00)
University of Gothenburg: wins 0/4 categories
Umea University - UMU: wins 0/4 categories
Malmö University - MAU: wins 0/4 categories
Stockholm Business School: wins 1/4 categories
Dalarna University: wins 0/4 categories
Stockholm School of Economics - SSE: wins 0/4 categories
Hyper Island: wins 3/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: AI and Data Management
Best programme: Life Science
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Business Administration and Political Science
Stockholm, Sweden
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Digital Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.71
4.50
3.62
5.00
2.00
Not rated
5.00
Location
4.86
4.00
3.90
5.00
2.00
Not rated
5.00
Professors
4.57
4.50
4.00
5.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
4.71
5.00
3.95
5.00
2.00
Not rated
4.50
Student life
4.00
4.50
3.55
4.00
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
4.29
4.50
3.57
3.00
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
2.86
3.50
3.23
3.00
3.00
Not rated
4.50
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Well-equipped research environments and facilities
  • +Interesting and well-organized programs
  • +Welcoming atmosphere and nice campus environment
  • +Positive interactions with professors
  • +Strong international student community
  • +Supportive and approachable professors
  • +Relevant and forward-thinking curriculum
  • +Diverse and inclusive learning environment
  • +Excellent teaching quality and global student community
  • +Broadened horizons and expanded knowledge in business and political science
  • +Abundant working opportunities to offset living costs

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Hands-on, immersive, and creative learning with freedom to shape studies.
  • +Direct industry insights and practical application from experienced professionals.
  • +Strong focus on building relationships with driven, like-minded peers.
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a persistent problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and organizational issues from the administration frustrate students.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are often seen as inadequate or uninspiring.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
  • -Ineffective communication and administrative inefficiencies cause frustration.
  • -Lack of engaging teaching methods and unclear learning objectives are recurring complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities and resources
  • -Misaligned curriculum and teaching methods
  • -administrative & management issues
  • -outdated facilities
  • -lack of engagement

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a problem.
  • -Course content and teaching quality often fall short of expectations.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners exceptional marks for its location, boasting a rating of 4.86. Facilities and internationality are also highly regarded, both scoring 4.71. Professors receive a solid 4.57, and the overall value is rated at 4.29. Student life scores a respectable 4. The weakest area by a significant margin is accommodation, with a score of just 2.86.

This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths, particularly in its international student experience, receiving a perfect score. Facilities, professors, and student life also garnered excellent feedback. While the location is well-regarded, accommodation received the lowest score, indicating an area for potential improvement within an otherwise highly rated university.

Analyzing the university's performance reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The institution excels in its **Internationality** (3.95) and **Professors** (4), indicating strong global engagement and a well-regarded academic staff. Conversely, **Accomodation** (3.23) presents the lowest score, suggesting room for improvement in this area. Other aspects like Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Value fall within a moderate range.

This institution shines with perfect scores in Facilities, Professors, Location, and Internationality. Student Life also receives a strong endorsement. However, Accomodation and Value for money present areas for potential improvement, indicated by their lower ratings compared to other aspects of the university experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores in Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Value. Professors and Internationality also received high marks, rated at 4 and 4.5 respectively. Accomodation stands out as the comparatively weakest area, though still very good at 4.5, reflecting a generally positive and well-rounded university experience.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.71/5 average rating from 7 reviews, students report overwhelmingly positive experiences, highlighting exceptional faculty and enriching academic environments. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight a nice environment and good faculty, with only minor suggestions for improvement in specific departments.

Most students (~74%) praise Malmö University's forward-thinking environment, modern facilities, and supportive professors. A small percentage (~9.5%) report issues with resources like printers and overpriced course materials.

This university garners a 4/5 average rating, with 100% of feedback being positive. Students praise exceptional teaching quality and opportunities for personal and academic growth.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Both university reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight the immersive, hands-on approach, freedom to shape studies, and the opportunity to build relationships. Approximately 0% of feedback is negative.

Rating distribution
5★
71%
50%
10%
0%
0%
0%
100%
4★
29%
50%
71%
100%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
10%
0%
100%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close