University of Twente vs Universidad Anáhuac vs Universidad Panamericana vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School vs Ironhack

Side-by-side comparison from 95 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences - MATE (5.00)
University of Twente: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Panamericana: wins 0/7 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Ironhack: wins 3/7 categories
Keep Coding: wins 0/7 categories
Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences - MATE: wins 4/7 categories
Comparing
Enschede, The Netherlands
4.30
Read more reviews
45 reviews
×
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Best programme: Communication
Aguascalientes, Mexico
4.10
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Madrid, Spain
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Agricultural Science
Category ratings
Facilities
4.33
4.50
4.33
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.67
Location
4.11
4.50
4.25
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.67
Professors
3.83
4.41
4.50
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.11
4.59
3.33
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
4.67
Win
Student life
3.93
4.63
3.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.67
Value
4.17
4.63
4.33
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.65
4.66
3.75
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.67
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +International and multicultural environment
  • +High-quality, progressive, and interdisciplinary education with good support
  • +Hands-on research, project-based learning, and manageable workload
  • +Leadership and values development
  • +Academic excellence and practical application
  • +Supportive community and modern facilities
  • +Highly qualified professors and academic excellence
  • +Strong business programs and professional connections
  • +Personalized attention and strong sense of community

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format

Nothing to show

  • +Expert, helpful, and approachable faculty.
  • +Strong academic programs and curriculum.
  • +Cooperative university administration and management.
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and poor infrastructure are a recurring concern.
  • -Students frequently express frustration with administrative and management issues.
  • -A lack of relevant curriculum and teaching quality is a significant point of dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.
  • -Intellectualism is perceived as cultish.
  • -Institutions are seen as unreliable sources of truth.
  • -There's a critique of seeking purpose through complex language and power.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources are a common complaint.
  • -Inconsistent and unclear communication from staff and administration is frustrating.
  • -A lack of practical application and outdated curriculum are frequently mentioned.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a compelling picture, with its facilities receiving the highest marks at 4.33. Notably strong are location and internationality, both scoring 4.11, closely followed by value at 4.17. The weakest area identified in the ratings is accommodation, which stands at 3.65. Professors also received a solid, though comparatively lower, rating of 3.83.

This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.

The university is highly rated for its professors, achieving a strong 4.5. Facilities and value also score well, both at 4.33. Student life, while respectable at 3.67, and accommodation at 3.75 represent areas where ratings are somewhat lower. Internationality is rated the lowest among all categories at 3.33.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Nothing to show

Overall, this institution garners excellent feedback. Professors and value for money received perfect scores, representing its strongest areas. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are all highly rated, achieving a consistent 4.67. Internationality also scores favorably at 4.67, indicating a strong global presence. There are no notably weak areas identified in these ratings.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Overwhelmingly positive feedback (~91% of reviews), with students praising the multicultural environment, progressive curriculum, and hands-on research. Some mention outdated tools, while others note manageable workloads and good career prospects.

With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.

University students praise academic excellence, professor quality, and modern facilities. ~92% of feedback is positive, with one reviewer expressing concerns about intellectualism.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

Nothing to show

All 3 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5 stars. Recurring themes highlight well-qualified, helpful professors and a positive university atmosphere.

Rating distribution
5★
38%
67%
33%
0%
50%
0%
100%
4★
51%
39%
58%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
11%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
8%
0%
50%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Interactive courses

A good program to get to know different aspects of your study. Courses share an interaction with one main project in each quartile. Most teachers love their job and are interesting to listen to. The campus is set up really nicely, good to enjoy during breaks.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close