Universidad de Zaragoza vs Tampere University of Applied Sciences - TAMK vs Le Mans Higher Institute of Business Engineering - ISIALM vs Jellyfish Training vs University of Marikina - PLMAR
Side-by-side comparison from 166 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality teaching and helpful professors
- +Strong career preparation and applied learning
- +Welcoming environment and diverse opportunities
- +Strong sense of community and support
- +Excellent teaching and learning atmosphere
- +Welcoming international environment and good facilities
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Supportive environment fostering self-confidence and personal growth
- +Diverse course offerings and accessible, free tuition
- +Engaging professors who nurture potential
- +Practical, engaging programs and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Vibrant campus life with diverse student body and activities
- +Modern facilities and opportunities for research
- +Supportive and communicative specialists/lecturers
- +Interesting and diverse program content
- +Professional and supportive academic environment
- -Administrative and management issues, including slow processes and poor handling of lost items.
- -Outdated facilities and uncomfortable seating.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality, with some teachers reading directly from notes.
- -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
- -Lack of resources and limited course offerings disappoint students.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent.
- -Poor lecturer attitudes and intimidating behavior.
- -Inconsistent and seemingly arbitrary rule enforcement.
- -Lack of acknowledgment for university oversights.
- -Strict and inflexible academic policies with a focus on punitive grading.
- -Resistance to accommodating diverse linguistic backgrounds.
- -Perceived unfairness and lack of student recourse in academic disputes.
This institution receives strong marks for student life, boasting an impressive 4.71. Facilities and accommodation also scored well, both at 4.26. Professors are rated favorably at 4.24, and location and value are solid at around 4.0. The weakest area identified is internationality, which received a score of 3.38.
The university scores well across multiple aspects, with **Location** and **Internationality** standing out as particularly strong areas, both receiving a rating of 4.33. **Professors** and **Student Life** are also rated highly at 4.17. The **Facilities** represent the weakest area, with a rating of 3.5, followed by **Value** at 3.67. **Accomodation** is rated a solid 4.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
An analysis of the university's ratings reveals a strong emphasis on student experience and academic quality. The institution excels in **Location** and **Student Life**, both achieving perfect scores. Professors and overall **Value** also received highly positive feedback, at 4.33. Areas for potential improvement include **Internationality**, rated at 3.33, and **Facilities** and **Accomodation**, which both scored 3.67.
This academic institution receives strong marks in several key areas, with Location standing out as its highest-rated aspect. Professors and Student Life also scored well, indicating positive experiences in these departments. Conversely, Internationality presents as the weakest area, receiving the lowest rating among the surveyed categories. Facilities and Accommodation are rated moderately, with Value falling somewhere in the middle.
Across various aspects, this institution demonstrates a solid performance. Its highest-rated categories include Value (4.29), Internationality (4.24), and Accomodation (4.24), suggesting a positive experience in these areas. Student Life also scores well at 4.12. Conversely, the weakest area identified is Location, receiving a rating of 3.98. Professors are rated highly at 4.34, followed closely by Facilities at 4.10.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting exceptional student life, talented personnel, and opportunities. A small percentage (~3.5%) of reviews mention issues with specific facilities or administrative processes.
Reviews indicate a strong sense of community and helpful staff, with ~74% of feedback being positive. Some suggestions for improvement include better funding for facilities and further development of international programs.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4/5, reviews highlight a positive learning environment, encouragement of self-expression, and valuable life skills. Some students also noted the availability of various courses and professors who foster growth.
~74% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable lecturers, diverse programs, and a vibrant campus atmosphere. A small minority of ~7% expressed challenges with lecturer attitudes and inconsistent rules.
~98% of reviews are positive, praising supportive specialists, interesting programs, and quality teaching. A small minority (~2%) found it difficult to pass and faced language barriers.
Llevo un año en esta Universidad y sin duda no me arrepiento de haberla escogido. Es una universidad pública, que como muchas otras concede becas de acceso. Se ofrece gran variedad de grados tanto de ciencias sociales, biosanitarias, tecnológicas y letras. Además se da la oportunidad de participar en actividades extrauniversitarias como debates, conferencias, cursos, deportes, política universitaria... Es una muy buena opción.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I would recommend it, but sometimes there can be moments, when classes are being cancelled or skiped. The courses are easy to understand, maybe that's subjective, but for me, it is quiet easy Pros: Friendly enviroment Skillfull professors Interesting Cons: A little bit non disciplined There can be times, when classes skips
