Saint Petersburg State University - SPSU vs Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University - SPbPU vs Moscow International Higher Business School - MIRBIS vs Eurasian Management and Administration School vs Center for Creative Leadership
Side-by-side comparison from 96 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical skills and real-world experience
- +Supportive environment and positive social life
- +Quality teaching and engaging subjects
- +Advanced labs and modern equipment
- +Highly qualified and involved teaching staff
- +Diverse academic and extracurricular development opportunities
Nothing to show
- +Practical, results-driven business education
- +Actionable assignments and real-world application
- +Experienced professors and industry insights
- +Student-centered support and inclusivity
- +Welcoming and understanding community
Nothing to show
- +Classic, traditional education
- +Beautiful, large campus
- +Rich student life
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of support and clear communication from staff is prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Ineffective teaching methods and curriculum design are problematic.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or poorly maintained.
- -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major drawbacks.
- -Lack of resources and support hinders academic success.
Examining the university's performance reveals exceptional strengths, particularly in **Student Life** (4.75) and **Internationality** (4.5). Facilities and value also received positive scores. Conversely, **Location** (3.95) and **Accomodation** (3.925) represent areas with room for improvement, though professors garnered a respectable 4.1 rating.
Overall, this university garners strong scores across most categories. Student life stands out as a particular strength, boasting the highest rating. Location also scores very well. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest marks, indicating an area for potential improvement. The university demonstrates a solid reputation for its professors, facilities, internationality, and value.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in **Value** and **Internationality**, both scoring very high. **Professors** also receive a strong rating, indicating high academic quality. **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation** are all rated solidly, suggesting a good overall student experience. The lowest-rated area, though still positive, is **Location**.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores awarded for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Value. These areas represent the university's most outstanding attributes. The accommodation rating of 3 indicates a moderate but not exceptional aspect of the student experience. Internationality also scores well at 4, suggesting a generally welcoming environment for global students.
Nothing to show
This institution garners exceptional ratings in key areas, particularly its **professors (5)**, **location (5)**, and overall **value (4.5)**. Facilities and student life also receive strong scores. Conversely, the university's **internationality (2)** stands out as its weakest point, alongside **accommodation (3)**, which is rated more moderately.
With an average rating of 4.25/5, ~88% of reviews are positive, highlighting theoretical and soft skill development, good faculty, and enjoyable extracurriculars. There are no negative reviews.
~92% of reviews are positive, praising skill development, modern labs, and qualified, involved teaching staff. Students also highlight extracurricular activities and university prestige. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.82/5 from 49 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highly praise the school's practical, results-driven business education and real-world application. Modules and assignments are frequently highlighted for their immediate applicability.
With one review, the university is highly rated at 5/5. This positive feedback highlights excellent student care and a welcoming environment. No negative reviews were received.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 5/5 from two reviews, the university is highly praised. Feedback highlights a classic, traditional education, a beautiful campus, vibrant student life, and brilliant professors. No negative reviews were submitted.
Nothing to show
'-': some equipment and manuals, that we study, are outdated. All buildings, except the main one, need to be repaired. Some teachers are incompetent in their subjects. ' ': Opportunities. A lot of opportunities. Large number of events are held at the university and if you will participate in them, you will develop yourself very much.
Nothing to show
If you’re looking for a practical, results-driven business education that makes a real impact, the Eurasian Management & Administration School (EMAS) is an excellent choice. EMAS stands out as one of the strongest business schools in Central and Eastern Europe, offering MBA, Executive MBA, DBA, and business coaching programs that focus on real-world implementation and strategic thinking. DBA at EMAS transformed my leadership and boosted my Business vision, it’s a Strategic DBA, that gives real business impact. The DBA sharpened my executive edge. In all it’s a Practical DBA, great support, real impact.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
