Université de Bretagne Occidentale - UBO vs IMT Atlantique – Graduate Engineering School vs TELECOM Bretagne vs National Institute of Advanced Technologies of Brittany - ENSTA Bretagne vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris
Side-by-side comparison from 14 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and dedicated staff and teachers
- +High quality faculty and academic level
- +Excellent library resources
- +Strong French language support
- +Rigorous academic programs
Nothing to show
- +High academic level, diverse specializations, and preparation for industry.
- +Opportunities for personal development across multiple fields.
- +Engaging campus life and exciting student activities.
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
- +Excellent study environment and facilities
- +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
- +High-quality business education
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently problematic.
- -Lack of student support and resources is a recurring concern.
- -Administrative and management issues caused frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources were a recurring problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support was a common complaint.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and communication from instructors is a problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are significant concerns.
- -The curriculum and teaching quality often fail to meet student expectations.
Nothing to show
This institution garners impressive scores, particularly excelling in its Professors (5/5). Facilities and Student Life are also highly rated at 4.5. Its Location and Value also receive a strong 4.5. Accommodations stand out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.5, while Internationality scores a solid 4.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, all receiving high ratings. Areas of average performance include **Professors**, **Location**, and **Accommodation**. The university offers a well-rounded experience with particularly positive aspects in its infrastructure, student engagement, global outlook, and cost-effectiveness.
Nothing to show
This institution garners exceptional scores for its **Facilities** and **Value**, both receiving a perfect 5. Conversely, **Location** and **Accommodation** represent the areas with the lowest ratings, scoring a 3. The university also performs well in **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality**, each earning a solid 4.
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
This institution garners strong marks across most aspects. Its accommodation receives top scores, indicating an excellent living experience. Facilities, professors, location, and internationality are all rated highly, suggesting a well-rounded and globally-minded environment. Student life is the sole area receiving a slightly lower rating, though still positive. Overall, it presents a consistently solid offering.
Nothing to show
With a 4.5/5 average rating from 2 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise supportive staff and faculty, with a mention of a good library.
With a 4/5 average rating, student feedback is predominantly positive. One reviewer highlighted a challenging yet rewarding academic experience with French and English program requirements.
Nothing to show
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, the university is highly praised. Students value the high academic level, competent teachers, and diverse course offerings enabling career readiness. Campus life is also described as exciting.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
With one review at 4/5 stars, this university is highly praised for its modern facilities, knowledgeable professors, and excellent study environment. Negative feedback is minimal, representing approximately 0% of reviews.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
IMT Atlantique Brest was an interesting phase in my academic life. Coming from an Anglophone educational system to a Francophone teaching style was quite a challenge at the beginning, but worthwhile in the end. My programme was in both French and English(60/40). Although I spoke a bit of French, it still required more knowledge to sail through the programme. This was made possible through the school's compulsory weekly French classes. The programme was very rigorous as we spent most of our time in class, in lab sessions or doing group projects. The professors are knowledgeable in their field and try to engage the students in each lesson, although some of them aren't good at transferring knowledge appropriately. The career seminars and job dating events were very beneficial in finding an internship and a job in the long run. Lastly, the intercultural environment helped me learn about different cultures, and also prepare me to work in multicultural teams in the real world. Overall, it was a good experience as I learned to study in a new language, make new friends and stand on my own in a new country. I just wish I did more research into the French teaching style before starting the programme.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
