Johan Cruyff Institute vs Maastricht University - UM vs Wittenborg University of Applied Sciences vs Maastricht School of Management vs UMIO Maastricht University
Side-by-side comparison from 83 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Specialized sports management content and expert professors
- +Valuable industry connections and networking opportunities
- +Welcoming atmosphere and excellent staff support
- +Supportive faculty and engaging teaching methods
- +International atmosphere and diverse student body
- +Problem-Based Learning (PBL) and small-group work
- +Practical, industry-focused curriculum with entrepreneurship and FinTech emphasis
- +Supportive, international, and diverse academic environment
- +Engaging and approachable professors and mentors
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Comprehensive education and extensive extracurricular opportunities
- +Strong industry connections and career preparation
- +Supportive learning environment and academic rigor
- +Engaging IB program with global cultural exposure
- +Development of skills and adventurous character
- +Rigorous program as a gateway to top universities
- -Poor quality of instruction and unengaging student discussions.
- -Ineffective project management and lack of professional experience among peers.
- -Problem-based learning is seen as ineffective and overly demanding.
- -Strict academic policies, including high failure rates and BSA, create undue pressure.
- -Program organization and structure are often perceived as poor.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are significant problems.
- -Communication and transparency are frequently lacking.
- -Overpriced tuition and hidden fees are a significant concern.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff and administration are frequently mentioned.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder the learning experience.
Across several key areas, the institution receives commendable ratings. Its strongest performances are noted in Value and Internationality, both achieving near-perfect scores. Professors also garnered exceptionally high marks. The weakest area is Location, which, while still positive, is rated lower than other aspects. Student Life, Accomodation, and Facilities all fall within a strong middle range.
This university garners excellent marks for its internationality, receiving a high rating of 4.54. Professors and value are also strong points, both scoring above 4.2. Student life and facilities are well-regarded, with ratings around 4.0 and 4.2 respectively. The location is rated adequately at 3.9. Notably, accommodation stands out as the weakest area, with a score of 2.9.
A notable strength lies in the university's **Internationality**, achieving a high rating of 4.875. Conversely, **Student Life** received the lowest score at 2.625, suggesting an area for potential improvement. Other areas, including Accommodation, Location, Value, and Professors, fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally well-rounded offering with specific areas of excellence and those needing development.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university garners an excellent overall rating, with particular strengths in its **Location** and **Student Life**, both receiving a perfect score of 5. **Value for money** also stands out at a 5. Areas receiving a solid score of 4 include **Facilities**, **Professors**, **Accommodation**, and **Internationality**. No categories fell below a 4, indicating a consistently strong offering.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for Facilities and Accomodation, alongside a flawless rating for Internationality. Student Life, Professors, and Location are all highly regarded with scores of 4. The sole area receiving a slightly lower, though still positive, rating is Value at 4, indicating a strong overall offering.
University students largely praise the insightful sports management content, quality professors, and valuable networking opportunities, with a ~96% positive sentiment. A small fraction of feedback (~4%) mentions issues with academic support variability or program depth.
Approximately 91.5% of reviews are positive, highlighting a welcoming campus, supportive professors, and a lively student city. Negative feedback, representing ~8.5%, points to high failing rates and concerns about the organization and pressure of Problem-Based Learning.
Most feedback is positive (~74%), highlighting practical learning, entrepreneurship focus, and internationalism. There are no negative reviews in the provided data.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With one review and an average rating of 5/5, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students highlight amazing education and ample support, including prestigious extra-curricular masterclass programs.
This university receives a high average rating of 4/5. The single review highlights enjoyment of the IB program, international connections, skill development, and preparation for top universities. There is no negative feedback.
A perfect synergy between theoretical knowledge, practical application, and high-quality networking. After completing the Master in Sport Management at Johan Cruyff Institute, I took a major step forward in my career in the sports industry. What truly sets this institution apart is the closeness and support of the professors and staff, as well as the enriching experiences shared with fellow students. Without a doubt, it has been one of the most transformative decisions of my life.
One of the most advertised features of the university, it is very pressuring and does not deliver the promised results - everything still has to be learned in the same manner as everywhere else - but here no tutorials are to be missed and PBL is supposed to be a key to successful graduation. Doing twice the work, therefore dividing the attention and time resources, without other options for students struggling with this method - then you are on your own.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
