Universidade Federal do Amazonas - UFAM vs Polish Japanese Academy of Information Technology - PJATK vs Middlesex University - MDX vs Universidad Fermín Toro - UFT vs Kharkov National Aerospace University - KHAI
Side-by-side comparison from 187 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent, competent, and updated professors and teaching methods
- +Diverse research and extension opportunities
- +Social equity and affordable student services
- +Practical and industry-focused programs
- +Supportive and engaging learning environment
- +Excellent and dedicated faculty
- +Practical, relevant, and industry-standard course content
- +Passionate, supportive, and approachable lecturers
- +Diverse, inclusive, and vibrant campus community
- +Strong academic foundation and professional development
- +Excellent teachers and supportive learning environment
- +Positive social experience and lasting friendships
- +Engaging and unique learning experiences
- +Strong academic programs and specialized fields
- +Convenient location and campus amenities
- +Supportive and welcoming environment
- +Helpful and understanding professors
- +Pleasant campus and classroom experience
- +Supportive instructors and engaging learning environment
- +Diverse and welcoming international student community
- +Valuable programs with practical experiences
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Communication from instructors and the institution is frequently unclear.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are commonly criticized.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often criticized as being ineffective.
- -Outdated facilities and learning materials are a significant drawback.
- -Concerns exist regarding the quality of education provided.
- -Limited resources, such as a small library, are a point of dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
- -Lack of communication and transparency from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unclear course expectations.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Poor communication and lack of support create feelings of neglect.
The university demonstrates considerable strengths in its **Facilities** and **Professors**, both receiving a solid 4 out of 5. **Student Life** also scores well at 4. A notable area for improvement is **Internationality**, which stands at 2.5, indicating this aspect is the weakest among the surveyed categories. **Location**, **Value**, and **Accomodation** fall within a moderate range, suggesting room for enhancement.
This university demonstrates significant strengths in its **Facilities**, which received a perfect score, and its **Location** and **Value**, both rated highly. The university also received a solid 4.33 for its **Professors**. Its **Accommodations** are a weaker area, scoring 3.67, while **Student Life** and **Internationality** received satisfactory marks at 4.
Surveyed metrics indicate a generally positive university experience. Professors and Internationality received the highest marks, both above 4.2. Facilities and Student Life also scored well, exceeding 4.1. Location and Value were rated respectably around 4.0. The weakest area, Accommodation, scored significantly lower at 3.6.
This institution demonstrates varied strengths and weaknesses across surveyed categories. Student life and professor quality stand out as relatively strong points, receiving scores of 2.0 and 2.3 respectively. Conversely, facilities and accommodation received the lowest ratings at 0.2 each, indicating significant areas for improvement. Internationality and value also present moderately positive aspects.
Excelling in its international outlook and offering excellent value, this institution garners perfect scores in these areas. Facilities and professors also receive strong marks, indicating a solid academic and infrastructural foundation. However, the university's weakest aspects lie in its location, student life, and accommodation, all receiving lower ratings.
Overall, the institution demonstrates a robust performance, with several areas receiving strong acclaim. Location and accommodation stand out as particularly well-regarded, both earning 4.5 stars. Facilities, professors, student life, and internationality are all rated a solid 4 stars, indicating a consistently positive experience. Value also achieves a high rating of 4.5 stars.
This institution garners exceptional scores for its **Facilities**, achieving a near-perfect 4.83. **Professors** and **Location** also score highly, both at 4.5, alongside a strong showing in **Student Life** and **Internationality**. **Value** is another significant strength at 4.67. The only area receiving a comparatively lower rating is **Accomodation**, standing at 3.8.
With an average rating of 4.4/5, ~80% of student feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent professors, diverse teaching methods, and research opportunities. Minor concerns about infrastructure were noted, but attributed to external factors.
All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5 stars. Students highlight great teachers, strong industry connections, and a blend of theory and practice, particularly in computer science and multimedia.
With a 4.24 average rating from 161 reviews, ~89% of feedback is positive. Students praise practical course content, passionate lecturers, and a good campus vibe. No negative reviews were recorded.
University feedback is generally positive (~67% 4-5 stars), praising strong education, professional teachers, and personal development. Some suggest improvements in practical classes and equipment. A small portion (~17%) notes poor facilities and outdated materials.
All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5 stars. Students highlight great people and fun science as positive aspects. One review mentions a convenient, large campus with nearby accommodation.
With a 4/5 average rating, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise the supportive environment, dedicated and understanding professors, and vibrant campus life.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 from 6 reviews, approximately 83% are highly positive. Students praise the friendly environment, diverse cultures, valuable programs, and supportive instructors, especially for international students. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
most teachers are very patient when helping and explaining to student with questions, the time table planning is not great, responsible team is only accepting online request which the reply was always unable to make changes(except health related issues )
I had a great time at UFT, met great people and considered most of my teachers to be very professional and well prepared. I learned a lot not only in terms of knowledge relative to my field of studies but tools for life in general. Had great friends and colleagues, and mentors as well. What I always wished for, was more technical/practical classes and that the school got better, more advanced equipment. Also better services for the student life. In any case, I've always been proud of the education I received from this institution, and how it shaped me as a professional.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
