UIC Barcelona vs Universitat d'Alacant vs University of Deusto - Deusto Business School vs Universidad Miguel Hernández - UMH vs Escola d'Art i Superior de Disseny d'Alacant - EASDA
Side-by-side comparison from 190 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent academic quality and well-prepared graduates
- +Supportive and international student community
- +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
- +Beautiful, convenient, and well-equipped campus with natural elements.
- +Kind, passionate, and supportive teachers fostering good student relationships.
- +Positive student atmosphere with engaging activities and a welcoming city.
- +strong academic quality and practical focus
- +welcoming and supportive community
- +multicultural and global perspective
- +Strong academic and research support from supervisors and diverse, interdisciplinary programs.
- +Modern facilities, including well-equipped labs and practice areas.
- +Supportive and collaborative student environment.
- +Professional, involved faculty and familiar atmosphere
- +Diverse design program offerings
- +Potential for improvement in facilities and organization
- +International environment and diverse perspectives
- +Practical application of neuroscience to business challenges
- +Engaging and insightful learning with relevant skills
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Unhelpful and indifferent staff.
- -Deceptive financial practices.
- -Inadequate academic training and poor teaching quality.
- -Outdated facilities and administrative issues.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are recurring problems.
- -Administrative and management issues, including a lack of transparency and fair handling of controversies.
- -Outdated or insufficient facilities that detract from the student experience.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities and difficult access.
- -Disappointing academic programs and limited practical application.
- -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a major concern.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
Nothing to show
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.25, followed closely by **Facilities** at 4.17. **Student Life** is rated a respectable 3.75, while **Internationality** scores 3.83. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating of 3.33, and **Location** at 3.91. The university also scores well in **Value** at 3.92.
Student life stands out as the university's strongest attribute, achieving a perfect score. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest rating. Other evaluated aspects, including facilities, professors, location, internationality, and value, all fall within a generally positive range, indicating a well-rounded experience with room for improvement in housing.
An overall assessment reveals a strong showing in several key areas. Location and Professors received particularly high marks, with Facilities and Value also scoring well. Student Life and Internationality demonstrate respectable performance. However, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, indicating a need for improvement.
This institution receives strong marks for its **Facilities**, earning a 4 out of 5. Student Life also scores well at 3.875. The university's **Accommodations** present the most significant area for improvement, rated at 3.125. Other aspects, including Professors, Location, Internationality, and Value, fall within a mid-range of 3.4 to 3.55.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in student life, internationality, and overall value, all receiving perfect scores. Facilities and accommodation are also highly rated, suggesting a comfortable and well-equipped environment. However, the location is a significant weakness, scoring only one out of five, and professor quality, while decent, is the lowest-rated academic aspect.
Overall, the university receives very positive feedback, with exceptional scores in value (5), professors (4.875), and internationality (4.875). Facilities and student life are also highly rated at 4.857. The weakest area identified is accommodation, scoring 4.285, though still a solid rating. Location also scores well at 4.667.
Nothing to show
With a 4.2/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong academics, supportive classmates, and good job preparation. ~7% of feedback is negative, citing issues with unhelpful administration.
With an average rating of 4/5 from 63 reviews, ~86% praise the beautiful, convenient campus and friendly, passionate teachers. A small ~5% of feedback points to concerns about teaching quality and exam structure.
Nearly all 52 reviews are positive, with ~74% praising high academic quality, excellent faculty and facilities, and a welcoming community. The campus environment and practical learning are also frequently highlighted. No negative reviews were submitted.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic support, research opportunities, and interdisciplinary programs. A small percentage (~7%) of feedback mentions concerns with campus facilities and university ethics.
With a 3.25 average rating, most (around 75%) student feedback is positive, highlighting professional teachers and a good learning experience. However, about 25% of reviews mention significant issues with outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
All ten reviews are positive, with students praising the program's international environment and practical application of neuroscience to business. They highlight the valuable knowledge gained, career impact, and engaging classes.
Nothing to show
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
Universitat d'Alacant enhances the energy of its campus community through a diverse selection of extracurricular activities. The university fosters an atmosphere that nurtures creativity and individual development, reflected in its modern facilities and dynamic learning environments. Professors, characterized by their passion and expertise, implement creative teaching approaches.
The DBS MBA is a master's degree for people who really want to learn a lot in a relatively short time, to do so they use a very dynamic and fast-paced work methodology, and in my opinion very useful and effective. In addition, teamwork is encouraged almost at all times, values that are highly valued if you come from more autonomous training such as engineering. The more purely theoretical training is also combined with real cases of entrepreneurship or experiences of successful people with high experience in the business world. Without a doubt, quality-price, I think it is the best master's degree you can opt for. Of course, being part of the Deusto Business School will greatly facilitate your access to the world of work, as well as a great networking network.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The classes are so intresting I love how they they teach you about psychology and business strategy, I really like how the teachers are real professionals in terms of marketing , buisness... overall I really enjoy it.
Nothing to show