UIC Barcelona vs Universidad de Cantabria vs Universidad Internacional Menéndez Pelayo - UIMP vs Centro Universitario CESINE vs Escuela Universitaria de Turismo Altamira - EUTA
Side-by-side comparison from 64 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent academic quality and well-prepared graduates
- +Supportive and international student community
- +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
- +High-quality education and well-equipped facilities
- +Positive student experience and personal growth
Nothing to show
- +Industry-connected faculty and practical learning
- +International and bilingual learning environment
- +Integration of creativity and professional skills
Nothing to show
- +Modern facilities and comfortable location
- +Diverse international community
- +High-quality teaching staff
- +Practical, real-world projects with companies
- +Strong professor and mentor relationships with personalized support
- +International and collaborative community environment
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Unhelpful and indifferent staff.
- -Deceptive financial practices.
- -Limited professor engagement with students.
- -Perceived lack of practical application in coursework.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are consistently problematic.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a recurring complaint.
- -Lack of effective communication and transparency is a significant concern.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources are a constant problem.
- -Poor teaching quality and a disconnect with curriculum expectations are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly structured.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.25, followed closely by **Facilities** at 4.17. **Student Life** is rated a respectable 3.75, while **Internationality** scores 3.83. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating of 3.33, and **Location** at 3.91. The university also scores well in **Value** at 3.92.
This university garners its highest marks for **Location**, achieving a score of 4.82. Professors and Value also received strong scores, both exceeding 4.1. Conversely, **Student Life** presents the weakest area, rated at 3.47. Facilities and Accommodation are rated moderately, around 3.8 and 3.6 respectively. The university also shows good Internationality at 3.8.
Nothing to show
Exceptional marks were awarded across the board, with perfect scores of 5 in all surveyed categories. This indicates a consistently outstanding university experience. Notably, strengths were found equally across facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, suggesting no single area stands out as significantly weaker or stronger than others.
Nothing to show
Exceptional scores define this university's offerings, with perfect marks awarded for its facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. The only area falling slightly below this perfect standard is its location, which still garners a strong rating of 4. This indicates a consistently outstanding experience with particularly notable strengths in academic and campus life quality.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its academic offerings and campus environment. Professors receive an outstanding 4.83 rating, closely followed by location at 4.78 and student life at 4.77. Facilities and value are also highly regarded. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, with a rating of 4.23. Internationality is rated well at 4.52.
With a 4.2/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong academics, supportive classmates, and good job preparation. ~7% of feedback is negative, citing issues with unhelpful administration.
With ~74% positive feedback from 23 reviews and an average rating of 3.65/5, students praise the supportive professors, modern facilities, and high-quality education. Minimal negative feedback (~4%) noted limited professor engagement.
Nothing to show
The single review is positive (100%), awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Themes highlighted include career-shaping experiences, strong industry connections, and an international atmosphere with bilingual classes.
Nothing to show
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, the single review highlights a pleasant atmosphere, excellent facilities, and a strong sense of community. The location and teaching staff were also positively noted.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% giving 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.75/5. Students praise the practical approach, real-world projects with companies, and supportive professors, highlighting personal and professional growth.
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
I really like the organization of this university, you can see they put effort on that. And also the teachers and Doctors that work there. You can see they all have an amazing career and they do care for us.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I enjoyed this programe, academically is it similar to other programs in other cities but it offers so much more. The personal connection with professors, strong guidance for future career and the international network is what separates it from other options!
