Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia - ENAH vs Universidad La Salle - ULSA vs Universidad Anáhuac vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 122 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Unique specializations in social sciences and history
- +Academic excellence and quality professors
- +Career-focused and demanding programs
- +High academic quality and strong professional skills development.
- +Integral and humanistic education fostering values and personal growth.
- +Friendly environment and supportive community contribute to a positive learning experience.
- +Integral formation and practical application of knowledge
- +Focus on developing leaders with values and strategic vision
- +Academic excellence, personal growth, and community engagement
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
Nothing to show
- +Strong academic programs and practical preparation
- +Supportive and effective professors
- +Excellent facilities and extracurricular opportunities
- +High-quality design education and fostering diverse perspectives
- +Active, collaborative student life with community and creative experimentation
- +Commitment to creative, critical, and socially conscious education
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a problem.
- -Outdated facilities and unreliable internet are major issues.
- -Administrative and management issues, including false accusations, are a significant concern.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a recurring problem.
- -Students face difficulties with unresponsive administrative and management issues.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as unengaging or irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause problems.
- -Facilities and resources are inadequate.
- -Course content and teaching methods are outdated.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant environment.
- -Inconsistent and unclear communication from instructors leads to confusion.
This institution garners exceptional praise for its value, receiving a perfect score. Professors and location are also significant strengths, both rated highly at 4.5. Student life and accommodation are well-regarded, achieving a solid 4. Areas for potential improvement include facilities and internationality, which both received a rating of 3.5.
This university garners its highest marks in Location, with a strong showing for Professors and Student Life as well. Areas for potential improvement include Accommodations and Facilities, which received the lowest ratings. The university's Internationality and Value also represent solid mid-range scores.
This university garners strong feedback, particularly excelling in **Accomodation** and **Student Life**, both scoring an impressive 4.67. **Value** and **Internationality** also received high marks. Areas with slightly lower, though still positive, scores include **Professors** at 4.42, which represents the weakest performance among the evaluated aspects. Facilities and location are rated very favorably, around 4.5.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
Nothing to show
This university receives strong marks in several key areas, with Professors earning the highest rating. Student Life and Location are also well-regarded, alongside Value. Facilities and Internationality are rated moderately well. The weakest area of performance is Accomodation, which received the lowest score among the surveyed categories.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in several key areas. Facilities, professors, location, and student life all received perfect scores, indicating a highly positive experience in these aspects. However, accommodation and internationality are notable weaknesses, scoring significantly lower. Value for money is also rated highly.
With an average rating of 4.67/5 from 3 reviews, the university is highly regarded. Positive feedback highlights excellent professors, academic excellence, and unique specializations like Ethnohistory. There is no negative feedback.
With an average rating of 4.17/5, approximately 83% of 18 reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic quality and values. A small amount of negative feedback mentioned outdated facilities.
University students overwhelmingly praise its integral formation, practical study plans, and focus on developing leaders. This ~100% positive feedback highlights strong academic programs, professional readiness, and personal growth opportunities.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
Nothing to show
Nearly all reviews are positive, praising excellent teachers, good facilities, and strong academic programs. A small percentage of negative feedback was noted.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students praise its commitment to creative and socially conscious education, high-quality design programs, and fostering a diverse, collaborative environment. There is no negative feedback.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
EDINBA is undoubtedly distinguished by its commitment to creative, critical, and socially conscious education. As a public institution, it offers access to high-quality design education, fostering diverse perspectives and constant exchange among students. Student life is characterized by an active and collaborative environment, where workshops, exhibitions, and collective projects strengthen a sense of community and encourage creative experimentation. Addressing current challenges in the field of design—such as digitalization, sustainability, and changes in creative processes—the school seeks to prepare its students to respond ethically and innovatively to the demands of the contemporary context.
